These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38863985)

  • 41. Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment.
    Philips Z; Ginnelly L; Sculpher M; Claxton K; Golder S; Riemsma R; Woolacoot N; Glanville J
    Health Technol Assess; 2004 Sep; 8(36):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. PubMed ID: 15361314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. General concepts in biostatistics and clinical epidemiology: observational studies with case-control design.
    Martínez D; Papuzinski C; Stojanova J; Arancibia M
    Medwave; 2019 Nov; 19(10):e7716. PubMed ID: 31821315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Meta-analysis: Problems with Russian Publications.
    Verbitskaya EV
    Int J Risk Saf Med; 2015; 27 Suppl 1():S89-90. PubMed ID: 26639728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Statistical fundamentals on cancer research for clinicians: Working with your statisticians.
    Xu W; Huang SH; Su J; Gudi S; O'Sullivan B
    Clin Transl Radiat Oncol; 2021 Mar; 27():75-84. PubMed ID: 33532634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Methodological evaluation of bias in observational coronavirus disease 2019 studies on drug effectiveness.
    Martinuka O; von Cube M; Wolkewitz M
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2021 Jul; 27(7):949-957. PubMed ID: 33813117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Public sector reforms and their impact on the level of corruption: A systematic review.
    Mugellini G; Della Bella S; Colagrossi M; Isenring GL; Killias M
    Campbell Syst Rev; 2021 Jun; 17(2):e1173. PubMed ID: 37131927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The 5Ts: Preliminary Development of a Framework to Support Inclusion of Older Adults in Research.
    Bowling CB; Whitson HE; Johnson TM
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2019 Feb; 67(2):342-346. PubMed ID: 30693952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Avoiding bias in observational studies: part 8 in a series of articles on evaluation of scientific publications.
    Hammer GP; du Prel JB; Blettner M
    Dtsch Arztebl Int; 2009 Oct; 106(41):664-8. PubMed ID: 19946431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Radiomic Analysis: Study Design, Statistical Analysis, and Other Bias Mitigation Strategies.
    Moskowitz CS; Welch ML; Jacobs MA; Kurland BF; Simpson AL
    Radiology; 2022 Aug; 304(2):265-273. PubMed ID: 35579522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The GRACE Checklist: A Validated Assessment Tool for High Quality Observational Studies of Comparative Effectiveness.
    Dreyer NA; Bryant A; Velentgas P
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2016 Oct; 22(10):1107-13. PubMed ID: 27668559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Prevalence of Avoidable and Bias-Inflicting Methodological Pitfalls in Real-World Studies of Medication Safety and Effectiveness.
    Bykov K; Patorno E; D'Andrea E; He M; Lee H; Graff JS; Franklin JM
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2022 Jan; 111(1):209-217. PubMed ID: 34260087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Addressing Common Misuses and Pitfalls of P values in Biomedical Research.
    Wang M; Long Q
    Cancer Res; 2022 Aug; 82(15):2674-2677. PubMed ID: 35919988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Methodological biases in observational hospital studies of COVID-19 treatment effectiveness: pitfalls and potential.
    Martinuka O; Hazard D; Marateb HR; Mansourian M; Mañanas MÁ; Romero S; Rubio-Rivas M; Wolkewitz M
    Front Med (Lausanne); 2024; 11():1362192. PubMed ID: 38576716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Avoiding negative reviewer comments: common statistical errors in anesthesia journals.
    Lee S
    Korean J Anesthesiol; 2016 Jun; 69(3):219-26. PubMed ID: 27274365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Avoiding common pitfalls in qualitative data collection and transcription.
    Easton KL; McComish JF; Greenberg R
    Qual Health Res; 2000 Sep; 10(5):703-7. PubMed ID: 11066874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Application of statistics on chronic-diseases-relating observational research papers].
    Hong ZH; Wang P; Cao WH
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Sep; 33(9):964-8. PubMed ID: 23290813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Glucose-lowering medications and the risk of cancer: A methodological review of studies based on real-world data.
    Bykov K; He M; Franklin JM; Garry EM; Seeger JD; Patorno E
    Diabetes Obes Metab; 2019 Sep; 21(9):2029-2038. PubMed ID: 31062453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Potential pitfalls in the design and reporting of clinical trials.
    Sydes MR; Langley RE
    Lancet Oncol; 2010 Jul; 11(7):694-700. PubMed ID: 20537947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. High prevalence does not necessarily equal maintenance species: Avoiding biased claims of disease reservoirs when using surveillance data.
    Wilber MQ; DeMarchi J; Fefferman NH; Silk MJ
    J Anim Ecol; 2022 Sep; 91(9):1740-1754. PubMed ID: 35838341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.