These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38865461)

  • 1. Ambivalent attitudes promote support for extreme political actions.
    Siev JJ; Petty RE
    Sci Adv; 2024 Jun; 10(24):eadn2965. PubMed ID: 38865461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Political extremism is supported by an illusion of understanding.
    Fernbach PM; Rogers T; Fox CR; Sloman SA
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Jun; 24(6):939-46. PubMed ID: 23620547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Feeling superior is a bipartisan issue: extremity (not direction) of political views predicts perceived belief superiority.
    Toner K; Leary MR; Asher MW; Jongman-Sereno KP
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Dec; 24(12):2454-62. PubMed ID: 24096379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Political polarization projection: social projection of partisan attitude extremity and attitudinal processes.
    Van Boven L; Judd CM; Sherman DK
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 Jul; 103(1):84-100. PubMed ID: 22545744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceiving political polarization in the United States: party identity strength and attitude extremity exacerbate the perceived partisan divide.
    Westfall J; Van Boven L; Chambers JR; Judd CM
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2015 Mar; 10(2):145-58. PubMed ID: 25910386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When Objective Ambivalence Predicts Subjective Ambivalence: An Affect-Cognition Matching Perspective.
    Ng WJR; See YHM; Wallace LE
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2023 Oct; 49(10):1495-1510. PubMed ID: 35819181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Feeling conflicted and seeking information: when ambivalence enhances and diminishes selective exposure to attitude-consistent information.
    Sawicki V; Wegener DT; Clark JK; Fabrigar LR; Smith SM; Durso GR
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2013 Jun; 39(6):735-47. PubMed ID: 23482502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Structuralistic and meta-psychological approaches to ambivalence in schizophrenia].
    Sumida K; Tsuda H
    Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2003; 105(8):1037-44. PubMed ID: 14577287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shifting liberal and conservative attitudes using moral foundations theory.
    Day MV; Fiske ST; Downing EL; Trail TE
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2014 Dec; 40(12):1559-73. PubMed ID: 25286912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The agony of ambivalence and ways to resolve it: introducing the MAID model.
    van Harreveld F; van der Pligt J; de Liver YN
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2009 Feb; 13(1):45-61. PubMed ID: 19144904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is political extremism supported by an illusion of understanding?
    Sloman SA; Vives ML
    Cognition; 2022 Aug; 225():105146. PubMed ID: 35533417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.
    Patterson MM; Bigler RS; Pahlke E; Brown CS; Hayes AR; Ramirez MC; Nelson A
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2019 Sep; 84(3):7-185. PubMed ID: 31503346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Let's not be indifferent about robots: Neutral ratings on bipolar measures mask ambivalence in attitudes towards robots.
    Stapels JG; Eyssel F
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0244697. PubMed ID: 33439891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ambivalence, prejudice and negative behavioural tendencies towards out-groups: The moderating role of attitude basis.
    Costarelli S; Gerłowska J
    Cogn Emot; 2015; 29(5):852-66. PubMed ID: 25147964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The political system through a partisan lens: Within-person changes in support for political parties precede political system attitudes.
    Satherley N; Osborne D; Sibley CG
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2023 Jan; 62(1):72-83. PubMed ID: 36251586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Purity, politics, and polarization: Political ideology moderates threat-induced shifts in moral purity beliefs.
    Leota J; Simpson D; Mazidi D; Nash K
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2023 Apr; 62(2):806-824. PubMed ID: 36344880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A moral house divided: How idealized family models impact political cognition.
    Feinberg M; Wehling E
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0193347. PubMed ID: 29641618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ambivalence and Interpersonal Liking: The Expression of Ambivalence as Social Validation of Attitudinal Conflict.
    Toribio-Flórez D; van Harreveld F; Schneider IK
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():525301. PubMed ID: 33132947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The social value of being ambivalent: self-presentational concerns in the expression of attitudinal ambivalence.
    Pillaud V; Cavazza N; Butera F
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2013 Sep; 39(9):1139-51. PubMed ID: 23761925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The conflicted individual: personality-based and domain-specific antecedents of ambivalent social attitudes.
    Thompson MM; Zanna MP
    J Pers; 1995 Jun; 63(2):259-88. PubMed ID: 7782994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.