These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38866024)

  • 21. Wing kinematics measurement and aerodynamics of a dragonfly in turning flight.
    Li C; Dong H
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2017 Feb; 12(2):026001. PubMed ID: 28059781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Wing coupling mechanism in the butterfly Pieris rapae (Lepidoptera, Pieridae) and its role in taking off.
    Ma Y; Zhao H; Ma T; Ning J; Gorb S
    J Insect Physiol; 2021; 131():104212. PubMed ID: 33662377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Aerodynamic performance of a hovering hawkmoth with flexible wings: a computational approach.
    Nakata T; Liu H
    Proc Biol Sci; 2012 Feb; 279(1729):722-31. PubMed ID: 21831896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Divergence of climbing escape flight performance in Morpho butterflies living in different microhabitats.
    Le Roy C; Silva N; Godoy-Diana R; Debat V; Llaurens V; Muijres FT
    J Exp Biol; 2022 Aug; 225(15):. PubMed ID: 35851402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Improvement of the aerodynamic performance by wing flexibility and elytra--hind wing interaction of a beetle during forward flight.
    Le TQ; Truong TV; Park SH; Quang Truong T; Ko JH; Park HC; Byun D
    J R Soc Interface; 2013 Aug; 10(85):20130312. PubMed ID: 23740486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Clap and fling mechanism with interacting porous wings in tiny insect flight.
    Santhanakrishnan A; Robinson AK; Jones S; Low AA; Gadi S; Hedrick TL; Miller LA
    J Exp Biol; 2014 Nov; 217(Pt 21):3898-909. PubMed ID: 25189374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Aerodynamic force generation and power requirements in forward flight in a fruit fly with modeled wing motion.
    Sun M; Wu JH
    J Exp Biol; 2003 Sep; 206(Pt 17):3065-83. PubMed ID: 12878674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Force balance in the take-off of a pierid butterfly: relative importance and timing of leg impulsion and aerodynamic forces.
    Bimbard G; Kolomenskiy D; Bouteleux O; Casas J; Godoy-Diana R
    J Exp Biol; 2013 Sep; 216(Pt 18):3551-63. PubMed ID: 23788714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Adaptive evolution of butterfly wing shape: from morphology to behaviour.
    Le Roy C; Debat V; Llaurens V
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2019 Aug; 94(4):1261-1281. PubMed ID: 30793489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Pigeons produce aerodynamic torques through changes in wing trajectory during low speed aerial turns.
    Ros IG; Badger MA; Pierson AN; Bassman LC; Biewener AA
    J Exp Biol; 2015 Feb; 218(Pt 3):480-90. PubMed ID: 25452503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Wing inertia as a cause of aerodynamically uneconomical flight with high angles of attack in hovering insects.
    Phan HV; Park HC
    J Exp Biol; 2018 Oct; 221(Pt 19):. PubMed ID: 30111558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Bristles reduce the force required to 'fling' wings apart in the smallest insects.
    Jones SK; Yun YJ; Hedrick TL; Griffith BE; Miller LA
    J Exp Biol; 2016 Dec; 219(Pt 23):3759-3772. PubMed ID: 27903629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Wing and body kinematics of forward flight in drone-flies.
    Meng XG; Sun M
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2016 Aug; 11(5):056002. PubMed ID: 27526336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Analytical model for instantaneous lift and shape deformation of an insect-scale flapping wing in hover.
    Kang CK; Shyy W
    J R Soc Interface; 2014 Dec; 11(101):20140933. PubMed ID: 25297319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An experimental comparative study of the efficiency of twisted and flat flapping wings during hovering flight.
    Phan HV; Truong QT; Park HC
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2017 Apr; 12(3):036009. PubMed ID: 28281465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Three-dimensional flow and lift characteristics of a hovering ruby-throated hummingbird.
    Song J; Luo H; Hedrick TL
    J R Soc Interface; 2014 Sep; 11(98):20140541. PubMed ID: 25008082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Aerodynamic effects of flexibility in flapping wings.
    Zhao L; Huang Q; Deng X; Sane SP
    J R Soc Interface; 2010 Mar; 7(44):485-97. PubMed ID: 19692394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Optimal flapping wing for maximum vertical aerodynamic force in hover: twisted or flat?
    Phan HV; Truong QT; Au TK; Park HC
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2016 Jul; 11(4):046007. PubMed ID: 27387833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Deformable model of a butterfly in motion on the example of Attacus atlas.
    Kunicka-Kowalska Z; Landowski M; Sibilski K
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Sep; 133():105351. PubMed ID: 35839632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of natural wing damage on flight performance in
    Le Roy C; Cornette R; Llaurens V; Debat V
    J Exp Biol; 2019 Aug; 222(Pt 16):. PubMed ID: 31371404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.