These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38866548)

  • 41. Saccharomyces cerevisiae: gene annotation and genome variability, state of the art through comparative genomics.
    Louis E
    Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 759():31-40. PubMed ID: 21863479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Gene prediction in novel fungal genomes using an ab initio algorithm with unsupervised training.
    Ter-Hovhannisyan V; Lomsadze A; Chernoff YO; Borodovsky M
    Genome Res; 2008 Dec; 18(12):1979-90. PubMed ID: 18757608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. MicroScope: an integrated platform for the annotation and exploration of microbial gene functions through genomic, pangenomic and metabolic comparative analysis.
    Vallenet D; Calteau A; Dubois M; Amours P; Bazin A; Beuvin M; Burlot L; Bussell X; Fouteau S; Gautreau G; Lajus A; Langlois J; Planel R; Roche D; Rollin J; Rouy Z; Sabatet V; Médigue C
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2020 Jan; 48(D1):D579-D589. PubMed ID: 31647104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. TSSFinder-fast and accurate ab initio prediction of the core promoter in eukaryotic genomes.
    de Medeiros Oliveira M; Bonadio I; Lie de Melo A; Mendes Souza G; Durham AM
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 Nov; 22(6):. PubMed ID: 34050351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. EuGene: An Automated Integrative Gene Finder for Eukaryotes and Prokaryotes.
    Sallet E; Gouzy J; Schiex T
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1962():97-120. PubMed ID: 31020556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A De-Novo Genome Analysis Pipeline (DeNoGAP) for large-scale comparative prokaryotic genomics studies.
    Thakur S; Guttman DS
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Jun; 17(1):260. PubMed ID: 27363390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Welcome to the big leaves: Best practices for improving genome annotation in non-model plant genomes.
    Vuruputoor VS; Monyak D; Fetter KC; Webster C; Bhattarai A; Shrestha B; Zaman S; Bennett J; McEvoy SL; Caballero M; Wegrzyn JL
    Appl Plant Sci; 2023; 11(4):e11533. PubMed ID: 37601314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Balrog: A universal protein model for prokaryotic gene prediction.
    Sommer MJ; Salzberg SL
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 Feb; 17(2):e1008727. PubMed ID: 33635857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Long-Read Annotation: Automated Eukaryotic Genome Annotation Based on Long-Read cDNA Sequencing.
    Cook DE; Valle-Inclan JE; Pajoro A; Rovenich H; Thomma BPHJ; Faino L
    Plant Physiol; 2019 Jan; 179(1):38-54. PubMed ID: 30401722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. COGNATE: Comparative Gene Annotation Characterizer.
    Wilbrandt J
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1962():269-281. PubMed ID: 31020567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Intrinsic and extrinsic approaches for detecting genes in a bacterial genome.
    Borodovsky M; Rudd KE; Koonin EV
    Nucleic Acids Res; 1994 Nov; 22(22):4756-67. PubMed ID: 7984428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. GeneMark-HM: improving gene prediction in DNA sequences of human microbiome.
    Lomsadze A; Bonny C; Strozzi F; Borodovsky M
    NAR Genom Bioinform; 2021 Jun; 3(2):lqab047. PubMed ID: 34056597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Integrating alternative splicing detection into gene prediction.
    Foissac S; Schiex T
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():25. PubMed ID: 15705189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. nGASP--the nematode genome annotation assessment project.
    Coghlan A; Fiedler TJ; McKay SJ; Flicek P; Harris TW; Blasiar D; ; Stein LD
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Dec; 9():549. PubMed ID: 19099578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. ParsEval: parallel comparison and analysis of gene structure annotations.
    Standage DS; Brendel VP
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Aug; 13():187. PubMed ID: 22852583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. MicroScope-an integrated resource for community expertise of gene functions and comparative analysis of microbial genomic and metabolic data.
    Médigue C; Calteau A; Cruveiller S; Gachet M; Gautreau G; Josso A; Lajus A; Langlois J; Pereira H; Planel R; Roche D; Rollin J; Rouy Z; Vallenet D
    Brief Bioinform; 2019 Jul; 20(4):1071-1084. PubMed ID: 28968784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Combining gene prediction methods to improve metagenomic gene annotation.
    Yok NG; Rosen GL
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Jan; 12():20. PubMed ID: 21232129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. OGS2: genome re-annotation of the jewel wasp Nasonia vitripennis.
    Rago A; Gilbert DG; Choi JH; Sackton TB; Wang X; Kelkar YD; Werren JH; Colbourne JK
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Aug; 17(1):678. PubMed ID: 27561358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. EAnnot: a genome annotation tool using experimental evidence.
    Ding L; Sabo A; Berkowicz N; Meyer RR; Shotland Y; Johnson MR; Pepin KH; Wilson RK; Spieth J
    Genome Res; 2004 Dec; 14(12):2503-9. PubMed ID: 15574829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Gene identification in prokaryotic genomes, phages, metagenomes, and EST sequences with GeneMarkS suite.
    Borodovsky M; Lomsadze A
    Curr Protoc Bioinformatics; 2011 Sep; Chapter 4():4.5.1-4.5.17. PubMed ID: 21901741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.