These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38866579)

  • 21. Minimally invasive surgery in cervical cancer.
    Bogani G; DI Donato V; Chiappa V; Lopez S; Monti M; Muzii L; Benedetti Panici P; Ditto A; Raspagliesi F
    Minerva Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 73(2):145-148. PubMed ID: 33306287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Radical Hysterectomy: Efficacy and Safety in the Dawn of Minimally Invasive Techniques.
    Gil-Moreno A; Carbonell-Socias M; Salicrú S; Centeno-Mediavilla C; Franco-Camps S; Colas E; Oaknin A; Pérez-Benavente A; Díaz-Feijoo B
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):492-500. PubMed ID: 29908339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Nerve-Sparing Approach Improves Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Bogani G; Rossetti DO; Ditto A; Signorelli M; Martinelli F; Mosca L; Scaffa C; Leone Roberti Maggiore U; Chiappa V; Sabatucci I; Lorusso D; Raspagliesi F
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(3):402-410. PubMed ID: 29191471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Minimally invasive surgery for cervical cancer: consequences for treatment after LACC Study.
    Kimmig R; Ind T
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Jul; 29(4):e75. PubMed ID: 29770634
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Same-Day Discharge in Minimally Invasive Surgery Performed by Gynecologic Oncologists: A Review of Patient Selection.
    Sanabria D; Rodriguez J; Pecci P; Ardila E; Pareja R
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(4):816-825. PubMed ID: 31715304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Incidence of adverse events in minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial.
    Obermair A; Asher R; Pareja R; Frumovitz M; Lopez A; Moretti-Marques R; Rendon G; Ribeiro R; Tsunoda A; Behan V; Buda A; Bernadini MQ; Zhao H; Vieira M; Walker J; Spirtos NM; Yao S; Chetty N; Zhu T; Isla D; Tamura M; Nicklin J; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Coleman RL; Salvo G; Ramirez PT
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Mar; 222(3):249.e1-249.e10. PubMed ID: 31586602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Changing treatment landscape for early cervical cancer: outcomes reported with minimally invasive surgery compared with an open approach.
    Melamed A; Ramirez PT
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 32(1):22-27. PubMed ID: 31815768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Feasibility and outcome of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with no-look no-touch technique for FIGO IB1 cervical cancer.
    Kanao H; Matsuo K; Aoki Y; Tanigawa T; Nomura H; Okamoto S; Takeshima N
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 30(3):e71. PubMed ID: 30887768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Survival after a nationwide adoption of robotic minimally invasive surgery for early-stage cervical cancer - A population-based study.
    Jensen PT; Schnack TH; Frøding LP; Bjørn SF; Lajer H; Markauskas A; Jochumsen KM; Fuglsang K; Dinesen J; Søgaard CH; Søgaard-Andersen E; Jensen MM; Knudsen A; Øster LH; Høgdall C
    Eur J Cancer; 2020 Mar; 128():47-56. PubMed ID: 32109850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy and the importance of avoiding cancer cell spillage for early-stage cervical cancer: a narrative review.
    Fusegi A; Kanao H; Tsumura S; Murakami A; Abe A; Aoki Y; Nomura H
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Jan; 34(1):e5. PubMed ID: 36424702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy without using uterine manipulator for early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Li RZ; Sun LF; Li R; Wang HJ
    BJOG; 2023 Jan; 130(2):176-183. PubMed ID: 36331008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive versus open radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical carcinoma and tumor size
    Nasioudis D; Albright BB; Ko EM; Haggerty AF; Giuntoli Ii RL; Kim SH; Morgan MA; Latif NA
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2021 Jul; 31(7):983-990. PubMed ID: 34016701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Decreasing utilization of minimally invasive hysterectomy for cervical cancer in the United States.
    Matsuo K; Mandelbaum RS; Klar M; Ciesielski KM; Matsushima K; Matsuzaki S; Roman LD; Wright JD
    Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Jul; 162(1):43-49. PubMed ID: 33992450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: When Adoption of a Novel Treatment Precedes Prospective, Randomized Evidence.
    Melamed A; Rauh-Hain JA; Ramirez PT
    J Clin Oncol; 2019 Nov; 37(33):3069-3074. PubMed ID: 31560581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Solution to prevent tumor spillage in minimally invasive radical hysterectomy using the endoscopic stapler for treating early-stage cervical cancer: Surgical technique with video.
    Mun J; Park SJ; Yim GW; Chang SJ; Kim H;
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2021 Dec; 50(10):102211. PubMed ID: 34481135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Adjuvant hysterectomy following primary chemoradiation for stage IB2 and IIA2 cervical cancer: a retrospective comparison of complications for open versus minimally invasive surgery.
    Miller H; Matsuo K; Roman LD; Yessaian AA; Pham HQ; Hom M; Castaneda A; Pham A; Ragab O; Muderspach L; Ciccone M; Brunette LL
    Radiat Oncol; 2021 Jun; 16(1):123. PubMed ID: 34187504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Long-term oncological outcomes of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A retrospective, single-institutional study in the wake of the LACC trial.
    Kanno K; Andou M; Yanai S; Toeda M; Nimura R; Ichikawa F; Teishikata Y; Shirane T; Sakate S; Kihira T; Hamasaki Y; Sawada M; Shirane A; Ota Y
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Dec; 45(12):2425-2434. PubMed ID: 31502349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for radical hysterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
    Brandt B; Sioulas V; Basaran D; Kuhn T; LaVigne K; Gardner GJ; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Long Roche KC; Mueller JJ; Jewell EL; Broach VA; Zivanovic O; Abu-Rustum NR; Leitao MM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Mar; 156(3):591-597. PubMed ID: 31918996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Survival After Minimally Invasive vs Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Nitecki R; Ramirez PT; Frumovitz M; Krause KJ; Tergas AI; Wright JD; Rauh-Hain JA; Melamed A
    JAMA Oncol; 2020 Jul; 6(7):1019-1027. PubMed ID: 32525511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Recurrence Rates in Patients With Cervical Cancer Treated With Abdominal Versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Review Study.
    Uppal S; Gehrig PA; Peng K; Bixel KL; Matsuo K; Vetter MH; Davidson BA; Cisa MP; Lees BF; Brunette LL; Tucker K; Stuart Staley A; Gotlieb WH; Holloway RW; Essel KG; Holman LL; Goldfeld E; Olawaiye A; Rose SL
    J Clin Oncol; 2020 Apr; 38(10):1030-1040. PubMed ID: 32031867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.