114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38869698)
1. Using Alternative Definitions of Controls to Increase Statistical Power in GWAS.
Benstock SE; Weaver K; Hettema JM; Verhulst B
Behav Genet; 2024 Jul; 54(4):353-366. PubMed ID: 38869698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using Alternative Definitions of Controls to Increase Statistical Power in GWAS.
Benstock SE; Weaver K; Hettema J; Verhulst B
Res Sq; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38352402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of case/control ratio and sample size on genome-wide association studies: A simulation study.
Turgut AO; Koca D
Vet Med Sci; 2024 May; 10(3):e1444. PubMed ID: 38581306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A simulation study investigating power estimates in phenome-wide association studies.
Verma A; Bradford Y; Dudek S; Lucas AM; Verma SS; Pendergrass SA; Ritchie MD
BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Apr; 19(1):120. PubMed ID: 29618318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How powerful are summary-based methods for identifying expression-trait associations under different genetic architectures?
Veturi Y; Ritchie MD
Pac Symp Biocomput; 2018; 23():228-239. PubMed ID: 29218884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Genome-wide association analysis for multiple continuous secondary phenotypes.
Schifano ED; Li L; Christiani DC; Lin X
Am J Hum Genet; 2013 May; 92(5):744-59. PubMed ID: 23643383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Semiparametric Allelic Tests for Mapping Multiple Phenotypes: Binomial Regression and Mahalanobis Distance.
Majumdar A; Witte JS; Ghosh S
Genet Epidemiol; 2015 Dec; 39(8):635-50. PubMed ID: 26493781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ordered multinomial regression for genetic association analysis of ordinal phenotypes at Biobank scale.
German CA; Sinsheimer JS; Klimentidis YC; Zhou H; Zhou JJ
Genet Epidemiol; 2020 Apr; 44(3):248-260. PubMed ID: 31879980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A benchmark study on current GWAS models in admixed populations.
Yang Z; Cieza B; Reyes-Dumeyer D; Montesinos R; Soto-Añari M; Custodio N; Tosto G
Brief Bioinform; 2023 Nov; 25(1):. PubMed ID: 38037235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimating the effective sample size in association studies of quantitative traits.
Ziyatdinov A; Kim J; Prokopenko D; Privé F; Laporte F; Loh PR; Kraft P; Aschard H
G3 (Bethesda); 2021 Jun; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 33734375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A novel association test for multiple secondary phenotypes from a case-control GWAS.
Ray D; Basu S
Genet Epidemiol; 2017 Jul; 41(5):413-426. PubMed ID: 28393390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Real world scenarios in rare variant association analysis: the impact of imbalance and sample size on the power in silico.
Zhang X; Basile AO; Pendergrass SA; Ritchie MD
BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Jan; 20(1):46. PubMed ID: 30669967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Design considerations for genetic linkage and association studies.
Nsengimana J; Bishop DT
Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 850():237-62. PubMed ID: 22307702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of improved microarray coverage and larger sample sizes on future genome-wide association studies.
Lindquist KJ; Jorgenson E; Hoffmann TJ; Witte JS
Genet Epidemiol; 2013 May; 37(4):383-92. PubMed ID: 23529720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A powerful statistical framework for generalization testing in GWAS, with application to the HCHS/SOL.
Sofer T; Heller R; Bogomolov M; Avery CL; Graff M; North KE; Reiner AP; Thornton TA; Rice K; Benjamini Y; Laurie CC; Kerr KF
Genet Epidemiol; 2017 Apr; 41(3):251-258. PubMed ID: 28090672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Bayesian Approach to the Overlap Analysis of Epidemiologically Linked Traits.
Asimit JL; Panoutsopoulou K; Wheeler E; Berndt SI; ; Cordell HJ; Morris AP; Zeggini E; Barroso I
Genet Epidemiol; 2015 Dec; 39(8):624-34. PubMed ID: 26411566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of measurement error on testing genetic association with quantitative traits.
Liao J; Li X; Wong TY; Wang JJ; Khor CC; Tai ES; Aung T; Teo YY; Cheng CY
PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e87044. PubMed ID: 24475218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multi-locus test conditional on confirmed effects leads to increased power in genome-wide association studies.
Ma L; Han S; Yang J; Da Y
PLoS One; 2010 Nov; 5(11):e15006. PubMed ID: 21103364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Binomial Mixture Model Based Association Testing to Account for Genetic Heterogeneity for GWAS.
Xu Z; Pan W
Genet Epidemiol; 2016 Apr; 40(3):202-9. PubMed ID: 26916514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bias-reduced estimators and confidence intervals for odds ratios in genome-wide association studies.
Zhong H; Prentice RL
Biostatistics; 2008 Oct; 9(4):621-34. PubMed ID: 18310059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
