126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38870437)
1. Multinational, Multicenter Evaluation of Prostate Cancer Tissue in Sub-Saharan Africa: Challenges and Opportunities.
van Wyk AC; Lal P; Ogunbiyi JO; Kyokunda L; Hobenu F; Dial C; Jalloh M; Gyasi R; Oluwole OP; Abrahams AD; Botha AR; Mtshali NZ; Andrews C; Mante S; Adusei B; Gueye SM; Mensah JE; Adjei AA; Tettey Y; Adebiyi A; Aisuodionoe-Shadrach O; Eniola SB; Serna A; Yamoah K; Chen WC; Fernandez P; Robinson BD; Mosquera JM; Hsing AW; Agalliu I; Rebbeck TR
JCO Glob Oncol; 2024 Jun; 10():e2300403. PubMed ID: 38870437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development and Validation of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Platform for Prostate Cancer Grading and Quantification.
Huang W; Randhawa R; Jain P; Iczkowski KA; Hu R; Hubbard S; Eickhoff J; Basu H; Roy R
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Nov; 4(11):e2132554. PubMed ID: 34730818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automated deep-learning system for Gleason grading of prostate cancer using biopsies: a diagnostic study.
Bulten W; Pinckaers H; van Boven H; Vink R; de Bel T; van Ginneken B; van der Laak J; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Litjens G
Lancet Oncol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):233-241. PubMed ID: 31926805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer in biopsies: a population-based, diagnostic study.
Ström P; Kartasalo K; Olsson H; Solorzano L; Delahunt B; Berney DM; Bostwick DG; Evans AJ; Grignon DJ; Humphrey PA; Iczkowski KA; Kench JG; Kristiansen G; van der Kwast TH; Leite KRM; McKenney JK; Oxley J; Pan CC; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR; Takahashi H; Tsuzuki T; Varma M; Zhou M; Lindberg J; Lindskog C; Ruusuvuori P; Wählby C; Grönberg H; Rantalainen M; Egevad L; Eklund M
Lancet Oncol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):222-232. PubMed ID: 31926806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of the ISUP e-learning module improves interrater reliability in prostate cancer grading.
Flach RN; Egevad L; Eklund M; van der Kwast TH; Delahunt B; Samaratunga H; Suelmann BBM; Willemse PM; Meijer RP; van Diest PJ
J Clin Pathol; 2023 Dec; 77(1):22-26. PubMed ID: 36328436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interobserver variability in Gleason histological grading of prostate cancer.
Ozkan TA; Eruyar AT; Cebeci OO; Memik O; Ozcan L; Kuskonmaz I
Scand J Urol; 2016 Dec; 50(6):420-424. PubMed ID: 27416104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Expected impact of MRI-targeted biopsy interreader variability among uropathologists on ProScreen prostate cancer screening trial: a pre-trial validation study.
Hietikko R; Mirtti T; Kilpeläinen TP; Tolonen T; Räisänen-Sokolowski A; Nordling S; Hannus J; Laurila M; Taari K; Tammela TLJ; Autio R; Natunen K; Auvinen A; Rannikko A
World J Urol; 2024 Apr; 42(1):217. PubMed ID: 38581590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of prostate biopsy secondary pathology review on radiotherapy management.
Siedow M; Eisner M; Yaney A; Washington I; Zynger D; Martin D; Mo X; Diconstanzo D; Diaz DA
Prostate; 2022 Feb; 82(2):210-215. PubMed ID: 34698410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in Japan and the United States.
Oyama T; Allsbrook WC; Kurokawa K; Matsuda H; Segawa A; Sano T; Suzuki K; Epstein JI
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2005 Aug; 129(8):1004-10. PubMed ID: 16048389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital Biopsy with Fluorescence Confocal Microscope for Effective Real-time Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Prospective, Comparative Study.
Rocco B; Sighinolfi MC; Sandri M; Spandri V; Cimadamore A; Volavsek M; Mazzucchelli R; Lopez-Beltran A; Eissa A; Bertoni L; Azzoni P; Reggiani Bonetti L; Maiorana A; Puliatti S; Micali S; Paterlini M; Iseppi A; Rocco F; Pellacani G; Chester J; Bianchi G; Montironi R
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Oct; 4(5):784-791. PubMed ID: 32952095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Histologic grading of breast carcinoma: a multi-institution study of interobserver variation using virtual microscopy.
Ginter PS; Idress R; D'Alfonso TM; Fineberg S; Jaffer S; Sattar AK; Chagpar A; Wilson P; Harigopal M
Mod Pathol; 2021 Apr; 34(4):701-709. PubMed ID: 33077923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Going deeper through the Gleason scoring scale: An automatic end-to-end system for histology prostate grading and cribriform pattern detection.
Silva-Rodríguez J; Colomer A; Sales MA; Molina R; Naranjo V
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Oct; 195():105637. PubMed ID: 32653747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Utility of Pathology Imagebase for standardisation of prostate cancer grading.
Egevad L; Delahunt B; Berney DM; Bostwick DG; Cheville J; Comperat E; Evans AJ; Fine SW; Grignon DJ; Humphrey PA; Hörnblad J; Iczkowski KA; Kench JG; Kristiansen G; Leite KRM; Magi-Galluzzi C; McKenney JK; Oxley J; Pan CC; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR; Takahashi H; True LD; Tsuzuki T; van der Kwast T; Varma M; Zhou M; Clements M
Histopathology; 2018 Jul; 73(1):8-18. PubMed ID: 29359484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer From Biopsy Specimens.
Nagpal K; Foote D; Tan F; Liu Y; Chen PC; Steiner DF; Manoj N; Olson N; Smith JL; Mohtashamian A; Peterson B; Amin MB; Evans AJ; Sweet JW; Cheung C; van der Kwast T; Sangoi AR; Zhou M; Allan R; Humphrey PA; Hipp JD; Gadepalli K; Corrado GS; Peng LH; Stumpe MC; Mermel CH
JAMA Oncol; 2020 Sep; 6(9):1372-1380. PubMed ID: 32701148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability of whole mount radical prostatectomy histopathology as the ground truth for artificial intelligence assisted prostate imaging.
Jager A; Postema AW; van der Linden H; Nooijen PTGA; Bekers E; Kweldam CF; Daures G; Zwart W; Mischi M; Beerlage HP; Oddens JR
Virchows Arch; 2023 Aug; 483(2):197-206. PubMed ID: 37407736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: urologic pathologists.
Allsbrook WC; Mangold KA; Johnson MH; Lane RB; Lane CG; Amin MB; Bostwick DG; Humphrey PA; Jones EC; Reuter VE; Sakr W; Sesterhenn IA; Troncoso P; Wheeler TM; Epstein JI
Hum Pathol; 2001 Jan; 32(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 11172298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stimulated Raman histology, a novel method to allow for rapid pathologic examination of unprocessed, fresh prostate biopsies.
Mannas MP; Jones D; Deng FM; Hoskoppal D; Melamed J; Orringer DA; Taneja SS
Prostate; 2023 Aug; 83(11):1060-1067. PubMed ID: 37154588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Artificial intelligence system shows performance at the level of uropathologists for the detection and grading of prostate cancer in core needle biopsy: an independent external validation study.
Jung M; Jin MS; Kim C; Lee C; Nikas IP; Park JH; Ryu HS
Mod Pathol; 2022 Oct; 35(10):1449-1457. PubMed ID: 35487950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Artificial intelligence assistance significantly improves Gleason grading of prostate biopsies by pathologists.
Bulten W; Balkenhol M; Belinga JA; Brilhante A; Çakır A; Egevad L; Eklund M; Farré X; Geronatsiou K; Molinié V; Pereira G; Roy P; Saile G; Salles P; Schaafsma E; Tschui J; Vos AM; ; van Boven H; Vink R; van der Laak J; Hulsbergen-van der Kaa C; Litjens G
Mod Pathol; 2021 Mar; 34(3):660-671. PubMed ID: 32759979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: general pathologist.
Allsbrook WC; Mangold KA; Johnson MH; Lane RB; Lane CG; Epstein JI
Hum Pathol; 2001 Jan; 32(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 11172299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
