These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38870524)

  • 1. Inpatient Hospital Costs and Route of Hysterectomy for Management of Benign Uterine Disease in the 90-Day Global Billing Period.
    Bauer HH; Sahmoud A; Rhodes SP; Sheyn D
    Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Aug; 144(2):266-274. PubMed ID: 38870524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.
    Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.
    Bretschneider CE; Frazzini Padilla P; Das D; Jelovsek JE; Unger CA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):490.e1-490.e8. PubMed ID: 30222939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost evaluation, quality of life and pelvic organ function of three approaches to hysterectomy for benign uterine conditions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Ekanayake C; Pathmeswaran A; Kularatna S; Herath R; Wijesinghe P
    Trials; 2017 Nov; 18(1):565. PubMed ID: 29178955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laparoscopic and Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy for Uterine Leiomyomas: A Comparison of Complications and Costs.
    Ngan TYT; Zakhari A; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Tulandi T; Abenhaim HA
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2018 Apr; 40(4):432-439. PubMed ID: 29032064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Value-based assessment of hysterectomy approaches.
    Danilyants N; MacKoul P; Baxi R; van der Does LQ; Haworth LR
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Feb; 45(2):389-398. PubMed ID: 30402927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Health resource utilization and costs during the first 90 days following robot-assisted hysterectomy.
    Dandolu V; Pathak P
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Jun; 29(6):865-872. PubMed ID: 28785778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Uterine weight and complications after abdominal, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomy.
    Louie M; Strassle PD; Moulder JK; Dizon AM; Schiff LD; Carey ET
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):480.e1-480.e8. PubMed ID: 29959931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A randomized trial comparing vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy vs robot-assisted hysterectomy.
    Lönnerfors C; Reynisson P; Persson J
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 25045857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Costs and outcomes of abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomies.
    Wright KN; Jonsdottir GM; Jorgensen S; Shah N; Einarsson JI
    JSLS; 2012; 16(4):519-24. PubMed ID: 23484557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patient, surgeon, and hospital disparities associated with benign hysterectomy approach and perioperative complications.
    Mehta A; Xu T; Hutfless S; Makary MA; Sinno AK; Tanner EJ; Stone RL; Wang K; Fader AN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 May; 216(5):497.e1-497.e10. PubMed ID: 28034651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hysterectomy Techniques and Outcomes for Benign Large Uteri: A Systematic Review.
    Mamik MM; Kim-Fine S; Yang L; Sharma V; Gala R; Aschkenazi S; Sheyn D; Howard D; Walter AJ; Kudish B; Balk EM; Antosh DD
    Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Jul; 144(1):40-52. PubMed ID: 38743951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determining Optimal Route of Hysterectomy for Benign Indications: Clinical Decision Tree Algorithm.
    Schmitt JJ; Carranza Leon DA; Occhino JA; Weaver AL; Dowdy SC; Bakkum-Gamez JN; Pasupathy KS; Gebhart JB
    Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 129(1):130-138. PubMed ID: 27926638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Longer Operative Time During Benign Laparoscopic and Robotic Hysterectomy Is Associated With Increased 30-Day Perioperative Complications.
    Catanzarite T; Saha S; Pilecki MA; Kim JY; Milad MP
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(6):1049-58. PubMed ID: 26070725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of Obesity on Peri- and Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Robotic versus Conventional Hysterectomy.
    Brunes M; Johannesson U; Häbel H; Söderberg MW; Ek M
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 28(2):228-236. PubMed ID: 32387567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Association of Robotic-Assisted vs Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy With Perioperative Outcomes and Health Care Costs, 2003 to 2015.
    Jeong IG; Khandwala YS; Kim JH; Han DH; Li S; Wang Y; Chang SL; Chung BI
    JAMA; 2017 Oct; 318(16):1561-1568. PubMed ID: 29067427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vaginal versus Robotic Hysterectomy for Commonly Cited Relative Contraindications to Vaginal Hysterectomy.
    Schmitt JJ; Occhino JA; Weaver AL; McGree ME; Gebhart JB
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(7):1158-1169. PubMed ID: 28689682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-analysis of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer and atypical complex hyperplasia.
    Herling SF; Palle C; Møller AM; Thomsen T; Sørensen J
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2016 Mar; 95(3):299-308. PubMed ID: 26575851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laparoscopic and robot-assisted hysterectomy for uterine cancer: a comparison of costs and complications.
    Zakhari A; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Spence AR; Gotlieb WH; Abenhaim HA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Nov; 213(5):665.e1-7. PubMed ID: 26188114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vesicoureteral Injury during Benign Hysterectomy: Minimally Invasive Laparoscopic Surgery versus Laparotomy.
    Chang EJ; Mandelbaum RS; Nusbaum DJ; Violette CJ; Matsushima K; Klar M; Matsuzaki S; Machida H; Kanao H; Roman LD; Matsuo K
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(6):1354-1362. PubMed ID: 31743796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.