BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38870532)

  • 1. Supervised learning of enhancer-promoter specificity based on genome-wide perturbation studies highlights areas for improvement in learning.
    Barth D; Van R; Cardwell J; Han MV
    Bioinformatics; 2024 Jun; 40(6):. PubMed ID: 38870532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Enhancer prediction in the human genome by probabilistic modelling of the chromatin feature patterns.
    Osmala M; Lähdesmäki H
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Jul; 21(1):317. PubMed ID: 32689977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enhancer identification in mouse embryonic stem cells using integrative modeling of chromatin and genomic features.
    Chen CY; Morris Q; Mitchell JA
    BMC Genomics; 2012 Apr; 13():152. PubMed ID: 22537144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predicting enhancers in mammalian genomes using supervised hidden Markov models.
    Zehnder T; Benner P; Vingron M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Mar; 20(1):157. PubMed ID: 30917778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Integration of 198 ChIP-seq datasets reveals human cis-regulatory regions.
    Bolouri H; Ruzzo WL
    J Comput Biol; 2012 Sep; 19(9):989-97. PubMed ID: 22897152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Opening up the blackbox: an interpretable deep neural network-based classifier for cell-type specific enhancer predictions.
    Kim SG; Theera-Ampornpunt N; Fang CH; Harwani M; Grama A; Chaterji S
    BMC Syst Biol; 2016 Aug; 10 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):54. PubMed ID: 27490187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. spatzie: an R package for identifying significant transcription factor motif co-enrichment from enhancer-promoter interactions.
    Hammelman J; Krismer K; Gifford DK
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2022 May; 50(9):e52. PubMed ID: 35100401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enhancer-MDLF: a novel deep learning framework for identifying cell-specific enhancers.
    Zhang Y; Zhang P; Wu H
    Brief Bioinform; 2024 Jan; 25(2):. PubMed ID: 38485768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. ChIP-GSM: Inferring active transcription factor modules to predict functional regulatory elements.
    Chen X; Neuwald AF; Hilakivi-Clarke L; Clarke R; Xuan J
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 Jul; 17(7):e1009203. PubMed ID: 34292930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exploiting sequence-based features for predicting enhancer-promoter interactions.
    Yang Y; Zhang R; Singh S; Ma J
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Jul; 33(14):i252-i260. PubMed ID: 28881991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cross-species enhancer prediction using machine learning.
    MacPhillamy C; Alinejad-Rokny H; Pitchford WS; Low WY
    Genomics; 2022 Sep; 114(5):110454. PubMed ID: 36030022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Enhancer occlusion transcripts regulate the activity of human enhancer domains via transcriptional interference: a computational perspective.
    Pande A; Makalowski W; Brosius J; Raabe CA
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2020 Apr; 48(7):3435-3454. PubMed ID: 32133533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predicting functional variants in enhancer and promoter elements using RegulomeDB.
    Dong S; Boyle AP
    Hum Mutat; 2019 Sep; 40(9):1292-1298. PubMed ID: 31228310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enhancer target prediction: state-of-the-art approaches and future prospects.
    Umarov R; Hon CC
    Biochem Soc Trans; 2023 Oct; 51(5):1975-1988. PubMed ID: 37830459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Integrating distal and proximal information to predict gene expression via a densely connected convolutional neural network.
    Zeng W; Wang Y; Jiang R
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Jan; 36(2):496-503. PubMed ID: 31318408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Probing transcription factor combinatorics in different promoter classes and in enhancers.
    Vandel J; Cassan O; Lèbre S; Lecellier CH; Bréhélin L
    BMC Genomics; 2019 Feb; 20(1):103. PubMed ID: 30709337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inferring time series chromatin states for promoter-enhancer pairs based on Hi-C data.
    Miko H; Qiu Y; Gaertner B; Sander M; Ohler U
    BMC Genomics; 2021 Jan; 22(1):84. PubMed ID: 33509077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Integrative epigenomic and high-throughput functional enhancer profiling reveals determinants of enhancer heterogeneity in gastric cancer.
    Sheng T; Ho SWT; Ooi WF; Xu C; Xing M; Padmanabhan N; Huang KK; Ma L; Ray M; Guo YA; Sim NL; Anene-Nzelu CG; Chang MM; Razavi-Mohseni M; Beer MA; Foo RSY; Sundar R; Chan YH; Tan ALK; Ong X; Skanderup AJ; White KP; Jha S; Tan P
    Genome Med; 2021 Oct; 13(1):158. PubMed ID: 34635154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sequence Characteristics Distinguish Transcribed Enhancers from Promoters and Predict Their Breadth of Activity.
    Colbran LL; Chen L; Capra JA
    Genetics; 2019 Apr; 211(4):1205-1217. PubMed ID: 30696717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Esearch3D: propagating gene expression in chromatin networks to illuminate active enhancers.
    Heer M; Giudice L; Mengoni C; Giugno R; Rico D
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2023 Jun; 51(10):e55. PubMed ID: 37021559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.