These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38871076)

  • 1. Considerations in Complex Survey Data Sampling, Weighting, and Analysis for Pediatric Research.
    Chen S; Anderson MP
    J Pediatr; 2024 Jun; 273():114142. PubMed ID: 38871076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nonlinear probability weighting can reflect attentional biases in sequential sampling.
    Zilker V; Pachur T
    Psychol Rev; 2022 Oct; 129(5):949-975. PubMed ID: 34370495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of sampling weights for survey data analysis.
    Pfeffermann D
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1996 Sep; 5(3):239-61. PubMed ID: 8931195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dopaminergic Drug Effects on Probability Weighting during Risky Decision Making.
    Ojala KE; Janssen LK; Hashemi MM; Timmer MHM; Geurts DEM; Ter Huurne NP; Cools R; Sescousse G
    eNeuro; 2018; 5(2):. PubMed ID: 29632870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Incorporating the sampling design in weighting adjustments for panel attrition.
    Chen Q; Gelman A; Tracy M; Norris FH; Galea S
    Stat Med; 2015 Dec; 34(28):3637-47. PubMed ID: 26239405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving the Efficiency of Inferences From Hybrid Samples for Effective Health Surveillance Surveys: Comprehensive Review of Quantitative Methods.
    Fahimi M; Hair EC; Do EK; Kreslake JM; Yan X; Chan E; Barlas FM; Giles A; Osborn L
    JMIR Public Health Surveill; 2024 Mar; 10():e48186. PubMed ID: 38451620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Occupancy modeling species-environment relationships with non-ignorable survey designs.
    Irvine KM; Rodhouse TJ; Wright WJ; Olsen AR
    Ecol Appl; 2018 Sep; 28(6):1616-1625. PubMed ID: 29802750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intuitive symbolic magnitude judgments and decision making under risk in adults.
    Patalano AL; Zax A; Williams K; Mathias L; Cordes S; Barth H
    Cogn Psychol; 2020 May; 118():101273. PubMed ID: 32028073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attribute attention and option attention in risky choice.
    Zilker V; Pachur T
    Cognition; 2023 Jul; 236():105441. PubMed ID: 37058827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Probability Weighting Functions Derived from Hyperbolic Time Discounting: Psychophysical Models and Their Individual Level Testing.
    Takemura K; Murakami H
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():778. PubMed ID: 27303338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Risk Preferences, Probability Weighting, and Strategy Tradeoffs in Wildfire Management.
    Hand MS; Wibbenmeyer MJ; Calkin DE; Thompson MP
    Risk Anal; 2015 Oct; 35(10):1876-91. PubMed ID: 26269258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Navigating complex sample analysis using national survey data.
    Saylor J; Friedmann E; Lee HJ
    Nurs Res; 2012; 61(3):231-7. PubMed ID: 22551998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Weighting Nonprobability and Probability Sample Surveys in Describing Cancer Catchment Areas.
    Iachan R; Berman L; Kyle TM; Martin KJ; Deng Y; Moyse DN; Middleton D; Atienza AA
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2019 Mar; 28(3):471-477. PubMed ID: 30642842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Design and Weighting Methods for a Nationally Representative Sample of HIV-infected Adults Receiving Medical Care in the United States-Medical Monitoring Project.
    Iachan R; Johnson CH; Harding RL; Kyle T; Saavedra P; Frazier EL; Beer L; Mattson CL; Skarbinski J
    Open AIDS J; 2016; 10():164-81. PubMed ID: 27651851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving External Validity of Epidemiologic Cohort Analyses: A Kernel Weighting Approach.
    Wang L; Graubard BI; Katki HA; Li Y
    J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc; 2020 Jun; 183(3):1293-1311. PubMed ID: 33071484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Health estimate differences between six independent web surveys: different web surveys, different results?
    Schnell R; Klingwort J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Jan; 24(1):24. PubMed ID: 38281040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Shared Decision-Making in the Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis: Results of a Cross-Sectional, Real-World Survey in Europe and the United States.
    Keenan A; Le HH; Gandhi K; Adedokun L; Jones E; Unsworth M; Pike J; Trenholm E
    Patient Prefer Adherence; 2024; 18():137-149. PubMed ID: 38249686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Responsive Design, Weighting, andVariance Estimation in the 2006-2010 National Survey of Family Growth.
    Lepkowski JM; Mosher WD; Groves RM; West BT; Wagner J; Gu H
    Vital Health Stat 2; 2013 Jun; (158):1-52. PubMed ID: 25093250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perspectives of Pediatric Rheumatologists on Initiating and Tapering Biologics in Patients with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Formative Qualitative Study.
    Currie GR; Pham T; Twilt M; IJzerman MJ; Hull PM; Kip MMA; Benseler SM; Hazlewood GS; Yeung RSM; Wulffraat NM; Swart JF; Vastert SJ; Marshall DA
    Patient; 2022 Sep; 15(5):599-609. PubMed ID: 35322390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the shape of the probability weighting function.
    Gonzalez R; Wu G
    Cogn Psychol; 1999 Feb; 38(1):129-66. PubMed ID: 10090801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.