These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3887150)

  • 21. The ability of plant genotoxicity assays to predict carcinogenicity.
    Ennever FK; Andreano G; Rosenkranz HS
    Mutat Res; 1988; 205(1-4):99-105. PubMed ID: 3285201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Data selection and treatment of chemicals tested for genotoxicity and carcinogenicity.
    Loprieno N; Boncristiani G; Loprieno G; Tesoro M
    Environ Health Perspect; 1991 Dec; 96():121-6. PubMed ID: 1820253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Transformation of BALB/c-3T3 cells: V. Transformation responses of 168 chemicals compared with mutagenicity in Salmonella and carcinogenicity in rodent bioassays.
    Matthews EJ; Spalding JW; Tennant RW
    Environ Health Perspect; 1993 Jul; 101 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):347-482. PubMed ID: 8243403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Computer-aided analysis of mutagenicity and cell transformation data for assessing their relationship with carcinogenicity.
    Taningher M; Malacarne D; Perrotta A; Parodi S
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 1999; 33(3):226-39. PubMed ID: 10334625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Application of a cellular test battery in the decision point approach to carcinogen identification.
    Williams GM; Weisburger JH
    Mutat Res; 1988; 205(1-4):79-90. PubMed ID: 3285200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Artificial intelligence and Bayesian decision theory in the prediction of chemical carcinogens.
    Rosenkranz HS; Mitchell CS; Klopman G
    Mutat Res; 1985; 150(1-2):1-11. PubMed ID: 3889611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Mathematical parameters for quantification of mutational responses in bacteria.
    Roldán-Arjona T; Pueyo C; Haynes RH
    Mutat Res; 1995 Feb; 346(2):77-84. PubMed ID: 7885403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The results of assays in Drosophila as indicators of exposure to carcinogens.
    Vogel EW; Graf U; Frei HJ; Nivard MM
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):427-70. PubMed ID: 10353398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparative evaluation of genetic toxicity patterns of carcinogens and noncarcinogens: strategies for predictive use of short-term assays.
    Tennant RW; Spalding JW; Stasiewicz S; Caspary WD; Mason JM; Resnick MA
    Environ Health Perspect; 1987 Nov; 75():87-95. PubMed ID: 3319571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis assay with mouse multiple organs: results with 30 aromatic amines evaluated by the IARC and U.S. NTP.
    Sasaki YF; Fujikawa K; Ishida K; Kawamura N; Nishikawa Y; Ohta S; Satoh M; Madarame H; Ueno S; Susa N; Matsusaka N; Tsuda S
    Mutat Res; 1999 Mar; 440(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 10095124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Identification of rodent carcinogens and noncarcinogens using genetic toxicity tests: premises, promises, and performance.
    Zeiger E
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1998 Oct; 28(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 9927558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The low pH Syrian hamster embryo (SHE) cell transformation assay: a revitalized role in carcinogen prediction.
    Aardema MJ; Isfort RJ; Thompson ED; LeBoeuf RA
    Mutat Res; 1996 Sep; 356(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 8841473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A paradigm for determining the relevance of short-term assays: application to oxidative mutagenesis.
    Rosenkranz H
    Mutat Res; 2002 Oct; 508(1-2):21-7. PubMed ID: 12379457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Carcinogenicity of mutagens: predictive capability of the Salmonella mutagenesis assay for rodent carcinogenicity.
    Zeiger E
    Cancer Res; 1987 Mar; 47(5):1287-96. PubMed ID: 3815340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. In vitro mammalian cell genotoxicity assays: their use and interpretation.
    McGregor D
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1990; 340B():159-69. PubMed ID: 2203003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Prediction of chemical carcinogenicity in rodents from in vitro genetic toxicity assays.
    Tennant RW; Margolin BH; Shelby MD; Zeiger E; Haseman JK; Spalding J; Caspary W; Resnick M; Stasiewicz S; Anderson B
    Science; 1987 May; 236(4804):933-41. PubMed ID: 3554512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Mutagens that are not carcinogens: faulty theory or faulty tests?
    Zeiger E
    Mutat Res; 2001 May; 492(1-2):29-38. PubMed ID: 11377241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of the Salmonella umu test with 83 NTP chemicals.
    Yasunaga K; Kiyonari A; Oikawa T; Abe N; Yoshikawa K
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2004; 44(4):329-45. PubMed ID: 15476194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. International Commission for Protection against Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens. Prediction of mammalian germ cell mutagenicity by the Salmonella assay.
    Bridges BA
    Mutat Res; 1987 May; 185(3):319. PubMed ID: 3553920
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The genetic toxicology of Gene-Tox non-carcinogens.
    Waters MD; Bergman HB; Nesnow S
    Mutat Res; 1988; 205(1-4):139-82. PubMed ID: 3285185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.