These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Soft Tissue Response and Determination of Underlying Risk Drivers for Recession and Mucositis after AMSJI Implantation in the Maxilla. Van den Borre C; De Neef B; Loomans NAJ; Rinaldi M; Nout E; Bouvry P; Naert I; Van Stralen KJ; Mommaerts MY Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2024 Apr; 39(2):302-309. PubMed ID: 37910836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A new approach to rehabilitate the severely atrophic maxilla using extramaxillary anchored implants in immediate function: a pilot study. Maló P; Nobre Mde A; Lopes I J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Nov; 100(5):354-66. PubMed ID: 18992569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Immediate full-arch rehabilitation of the severely atrophic maxilla supported by zygomatic implants: a prospective clinical study with minimum follow-up of 6 years. Agliardi EL; Romeo D; Panigatti S; de Araújo Nobre M; Maló P Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Dec; 46(12):1592-1599. PubMed ID: 28655434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Rehabilitation of the Atrophic Posterior Maxilla Using Splinted Short Implants or Sinus Augmentation with Standard-Length Implants: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Pieri F; Caselli E; Forlivesi C; Corinaldesi G Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):1179-88. PubMed ID: 27632276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A prospective clinical study on titanium implants in the zygomatic arch for prosthetic rehabilitation of the atrophic edentulous maxilla with a follow-up of 6 months to 5 years. Aparicio C; Ouazzani W; Garcia R; Arevalo X; Muela R; Fortes V Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(3):114-22. PubMed ID: 16919019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 5 × 5 mm implants with a nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surface or by longer implants in augmented bone. 3-year results from a randomised controlled trial. Gastaldi G; Felice P; Pistilli V; Barausse C; Ippolito DR; Esposito M Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 29557400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6 mm-long, 4 mm-wide implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. Preliminary results from a pilot randomised controlled trial. Esposito M; Cannizzaro G; Soardi E; Pistilli R; Piattelli M; Corvino V; Felice P Eur J Oral Implantol; 2012; 5(1):19-33. PubMed ID: 22518377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. 4 mm long vs longer implants in augmented bone in posterior atrophic jaws: 1-year post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Bolle C; Felice P; Barausse C; Pistilli V; Trullenque-Eriksson A; Esposito M Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11(1):31-47. PubMed ID: 29557399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Implants placed in the nasopalatine canal to rehabilitate severely atrophic maxillae: a retrospective study with long follow-up. Peñarrocha D; Candel E; Guirado JL; Canullo L; Peñarrocha M J Oral Implantol; 2014 Dec; 40(6):699-706. PubMed ID: 23397941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Retrospective study of pterygoid implants in the atrophic posterior maxilla: implant and prosthesis survival rates up to 3 years. Curi MM; Cardoso CL; Ribeiro Kde C Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(2):378-83. PubMed ID: 25830398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Immediate rehabilitation of the completely edentulous jaw with fixed prostheses supported by either upright or tilted implants: a multicenter clinical study. Capelli M; Zuffetti F; Del Fabbro M; Testori T Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):639-44. PubMed ID: 17929526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Immediately loaded zygomatic implants vs conventional dental implants in augmented atrophic maxillae: 4 months post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Esposito M; Davó R; Marti-Pages C; Ferrer-Fuertes A; Barausse C; Pistilli R; Ippolito DR; Felice P Eur J Oral Implantol; 2018; 11(1):11-28. PubMed ID: 29557398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Titanium and polyether ether ketone (PEEK) patient-specific sub-periosteal implants: two novel approaches for rehabilitation of the severely atrophic anterior maxillary ridge. Mounir M; Atef M; Abou-Elfetouh A; Hakam MM Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 May; 47(5):658-664. PubMed ID: 29183698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. "All-on-four" concept and immediate loading for simultaneous rehabilitation of the atrophic maxilla and mandible with conventional and zygomatic implants. Ferreira EJ; Kuabara MR; Gulinelli JL Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Apr; 48(3):218-20. PubMed ID: 19767132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Short (5 and 7 mm long) porous implants in the posterior atrophic maxilla: a 5-year report of a prospective single-cohort study. Perelli M; Abundo R; Corrente G; Saccone C Eur J Oral Implantol; 2012; 5(3):265-72. PubMed ID: 23000710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Tilted implants as an alternative to maxillary sinus grafting: a clinical, radiologic, and periotest study. Aparicio C; Perales P; Rangert B Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2001; 3(1):39-49. PubMed ID: 11441542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of 31 zygomatic implants and 74 regular dental implants used in 16 patients for prosthetic reconstruction of the atrophic maxilla with cross-arch fixed bridges. Becktor JP; Isaksson S; Abrahamsson P; Sennerby L Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2005; 7(3):159-65. PubMed ID: 16219246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]