These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38872321)

  • 1. Effect of different instrumental techniques and clinical experience on shade matching.
    Saygılı S; Albayrak B; Sülün T
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38872321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison between visual, intraoral scanner, and spectrophotometer shade matching: A clinical study.
    Liberato WF; Barreto IC; Costa PP; de Almeida CC; Pimentel W; Tiossi R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Feb; 121(2):271-275. PubMed ID: 30722987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of visual shade matching and photographic shade analysis.
    Rondón LF; Ramírez R; Pecho OE
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Mar; 34(2):374-382. PubMed ID: 35128799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Shade matching assisted by digital photography and computer software.
    Schropp L
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Apr; 18(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 19141046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Color reproduction trueness of 3D-printed full-color dental casts with scans derived from an intraoral scanner.
    Alfaraj A; Lin WS
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38112239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of Shade Matching in Natural Dentitions Using Intraoral Digital Spectrophotometer in LED and Filtered LED Light Sources.
    Chitrarsu VK; Chidambaranathan AS; Balasubramaniam M
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e68-e73. PubMed ID: 29086458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of cross-polarization filters on the trueness of colors obtained with a single-lens reflex camera, macro lens, and a ring flash.
    Yilmaz B; Dede DÖ; Diker E; Fonseca M; Johnston WM; Küçükekenci AS
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2023 Sep; 35(6):878-885. PubMed ID: 37073977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual and instrumental shade matching using CIELAB and CIEDE2000 color difference formulas.
    Pecho OE; Ghinea R; Alessandretti R; Pérez MM; Della Bona A
    Dent Mater; 2016 Jan; 32(1):82-92. PubMed ID: 26631341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing the effectiveness of shade measurement by intraoral scanner, digital spectrophotometer, and visual shade assessment.
    Czigola A; Róth I; Vitai V; Fehér D; Hermann P; Borbély J
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2021 Dec; 33(8):1166-1174. PubMed ID: 34397163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Comparative Study of Shade-Matching Reproducibility Using an Intraoral Scanner and a Spectrophotometer.
    Floriani F; Jurado CA; Abuhammoud S; Vargas M; Fischer NG; Rojas-Rueda S; Lopes GC
    Dent J (Basel); 2024 Mar; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 38534286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparative in vivo study of new shade matching procedures.
    Hampé-Kautz V; Salehi A; Senger B; Etienne O
    Int J Comput Dent; 2020; 23(4):317-323. PubMed ID: 33491927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Repeatability of the human eye compared to an intraoral scanner in dental shade matching.
    Reyes J; Acosta P; Ventura D
    Heliyon; 2019 Jul; 5(7):e02100. PubMed ID: 31372552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison between direct and indirect "digital image" dental visual shade matching considering the effect of clinical experience and gender.
    Makhloota M; Köroğlu A; Turhan Bal B; Velioğlu N
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 Jun; 36(6):827-837. PubMed ID: 38197140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability of visual and instrumental color matching.
    Igiel C; Lehmann KM; Ghinea R; Weyhrauch M; Hangx Y; Scheller H; Paravina RD
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2017 Sep; 29(5):303-308. PubMed ID: 28742283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Comparison of the color difference between teeth underwent cold light whitening and two kinds of shade guides].
    Xu YX
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Jun; 50(3):543-546. PubMed ID: 29930427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical Performance of Newly Developed Android Mobile Digital Application on Tooth Shade Reproduction: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
    Chaware SH; Borse SV; Kakatkar V; Darekar A
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2023; 14(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 37250002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Influence of Dental Shade Guides and Experience on the Accuracy of Shade Matching.
    Nakhaei M; Ghanbarzadeh J; Amirinejad S; Alavi S; Rajatihaghi H
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jan; 17(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 27084858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of digital imaging for colour matching and communication in restorative dentistry.
    Jarad FD; Russell MD; Moss BW
    Br Dent J; 2005 Jul; 199(1):43-9; discussion 33. PubMed ID: 16003426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of individual education and training on quality of color matching in dentistry.
    Ristic IS; Boskovic M; Gonzalez MD; Paravina RD
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 Jan; 36(1):116-123. PubMed ID: 37086204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of Gender on Visual Shade Matching in Dentistry.
    Pecho OE; Ghinea R; Perez MM; Della Bona A
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2017 Apr; 29(2):E15-E23. PubMed ID: 28185440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.