129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38873010)
1. Evaluating Feasibility and Durability of the Aero Prosthetic Liner in Transtibial Prosthetic Users.
Miyata Y; Sasaki K; Guerra G; Dacharux W; Chaiwan P
Can Prosthet Orthot J; 2023; 6(1):41865. PubMed ID: 38873010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sustainable, affordable and functional: reimagining prosthetic liners in resource limited environments.
Miyata Y; Sasaki K; Guerra G; Rattanakoch J
Disabil Rehabil; 2022 Jun; 44(12):2941-2947. PubMed ID: 33167733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of Dermo and Seal-In X5 prosthetic liners on pressure distributions and reported satisfaction during ramp ambulation in persons with transtibial limb loss.
Ali S; Osman NA; Razak A; Hussain S; Wan Abas WA
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2015 Feb; 51(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 24963603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical investigation of the interface pressure in the trans-tibial socket with Dermo and Seal-In X5 liner during walking and their effect on patient satisfaction.
Ali S; Osman NA; Mortaza N; Eshraghi A; Gholizadeh H; Wan Abas WA
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Nov; 27(9):943-8. PubMed ID: 22795863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantification of prosthetic outcomes: elastomeric gel liner with locking pin suspension versus polyethylene foam liner with neoprene sleeve suspension.
Coleman KL; Boone DA; Laing LS; Mathews DE; Smith DG
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2004 Jul; 41(4):591-602. PubMed ID: 15558387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Satisfaction and problems experienced with transfemoral suspension systems: a comparison between common suction socket and seal-in liner.
Gholizadeh H; Abu Osman NA; Eshraghi A; Ali S; Yahyavi ES
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2013 Aug; 94(8):1584-9. PubMed ID: 23262380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A personalised prosthetic liner with embedded sensor technology: a case study.
Paternò L; Dhokia V; Menciassi A; Bilzon J; Seminati E
Biomed Eng Online; 2020 Sep; 19(1):71. PubMed ID: 32928238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transtibial prosthetic socket pistoning: static evaluation of Seal-In(®) X5 and Dermo(®) Liner using motion analysis system.
Gholizadeh H; Osman NA; Kamyab M; Eshraghi A; Abas WA; Azam MN
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Jan; 27(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 21794965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of prosthetic gel liner thickness on gait biomechanics and pressure distribution within the transtibial socket.
Boutwell E; Stine R; Hansen A; Tucker K; Gard S
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2012; 49(2):227-40. PubMed ID: 22773525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Study on friction behavior at the interface between prosthetic socket and liner.
Xie J; Liu X; Tang J; Li XI; Li W
Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2021; 23(1):83-93. PubMed ID: 34846045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Activity, socket fit, comfort and community participation in lower limb prosthesis users: a Cambodian cohort study.
Diment L; Nguon R; Seng S; Sit V; Lors P; Thor P; Srors S; Kheng S; Granat M; Donovan-Hall M; Worsley P; Dickinson A
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2022 May; 19(1):42. PubMed ID: 35501879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Toward improving residual limb climate within prostheses for persons with lower limb loss: a technical note.
Knight AD; Hendershot BD; Sleeman TJ; Dearth CL; Starker F; Schneider U; Koehler-McNicholas SR; Barrons K; Nickel E; Mion S; Ferguson J; Slater BS; Voss GO; Koester K; Hansen AH
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2022 Apr; 46(2):202-205. PubMed ID: 34932513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transtibial prosthetic suspension: less pistoning versus easy donning and doffing.
Gholizadeh H; Abu Osman NA; Eshraghi A; Ali S; Sævarsson SK; Wan Abas WA; Pirouzi GH
J Rehabil Res Dev; 2012; 49(9):1321-30. PubMed ID: 23408214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An adaptive prosthetic socket for people with transtibial amputation.
Sanders JE; Vamos AC; Mertens JC; Allyn KJ; Larsen BG; Ballesteros D; Wang H; DeGrasse NS; Garbini JL; Hafner BJ; Friedly JL
Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):11168. PubMed ID: 38750086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measurements of Best, Worst, and Average Socket Comfort Are More Reliable Than Current Socket Comfort in Established Lower Limb Prosthesis Users.
Morgan SJ; Askew RL; Hafner BJ
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2022 Jun; 103(6):1201-1204. PubMed ID: 34748757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantifying Bone and Skin Movement in the Residual Limb-Socket Interface of Individuals With Transtibial Limb Loss Using Dynamic Stereo X-Ray: Protocol for a Lower Limb Loss Cadaver and Clinical Study.
Maikos JT; Chomack JM; Herlihy DV; Paglia DN; Wetterstrand C; O'Connor JP; Hyre MJ; Loan JP; D'Andrea SE
JMIR Res Protoc; 2024 Apr; 13():e57329. PubMed ID: 38669065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. User experience of transtibial prosthetic liners: A systematic review.
Richardson A; Dillon MP
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Feb; 41(1):6-18. PubMed ID: 26932981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improved Self-Reported Comfort, Stability, and Limb Temperature Regulation with an Immediate Fit, Adjustable Transtibial Prosthesis.
McCloskey C; Kenia J; Shofer F; Marschalek J; Dillingham T
Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl; 2020 Dec; 2(4):. PubMed ID: 33381750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Case study: survey of patient satisfaction with prosthesis quality and design among below-knee prosthetic leg socket users.
Mohd Hawari N; Jawaid M; Md Tahir P; Azmeer RA
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2017 Nov; 12(8):868-874. PubMed ID: 28068847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Prospective Assessment of an Adjustable, Immediate Fit, Subischial Transfemoral Prosthesis.
Dillingham TR; Kenia JL; Shofer FS; Marschalek JS
Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl; 2022 Sep; 4(3):100200. PubMed ID: 36123976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
