These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38874237)

  • 1. Evaluating the Readability, Quality, and Reliability of Online Patient Education Materials on Spinal Cord Stimulation.
    Gunduz ME; Matis GK; Ozduran E; Hanci V
    Turk Neurosurg; 2024; 34(4):588-599. PubMed ID: 38874237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing parental comprehension of online resources on childhood pain.
    Ocmen E; Erdemir I; Aksu Erdost H; Hanci V
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2024 Jun; 103(25):e38569. PubMed ID: 38905405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online patient education materials on post-covid pain.
    Ozduran E; Büyükçoban S
    PeerJ; 2022; 10():e13686. PubMed ID: 35880220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online patient education materials on transcutaneuous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS).
    Erkin Y; Hanci V; Ozduran E
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Apr; 102(16):e33529. PubMed ID: 37083809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating the readability, quality and reliability of online information on Behçet's disease.
    Özduran E; Hanci V
    Reumatismo; 2022 Sep; 74(2):. PubMed ID: 36101989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How readable and quality are online patient education materials about Helicobacter pylori?: Assessment of the readability, quality and reliability.
    Yilmaz Hanci S
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Oct; 102(43):e35543. PubMed ID: 37904459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.
    Huang G; Fang CH; Agarwal N; Bhagat N; Eloy JA; Langer PD
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 133(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 25654639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Readability assessment of online tracheostomy care resources.
    Kong KA; Hu A
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Feb; 152(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 25450410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating the reliability and readability of online information on osteoporosis.
    Yurdakul OV; Kilicoglu MS; Bagcier F
    Arch Endocrinol Metab; 2021 Nov; 65(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 33166440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The quality, understandability, readability, and popularity of online educational materials for heart murmur.
    Arslan D; Sami Tutar M; Kozanhan B; Bagci Z
    Cardiol Young; 2020 Mar; 30(3):328-336. PubMed ID: 31875800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Readability assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to mammography for breast cancer screening.
    AlKhalili R; Shukla PA; Patel RH; Sanghvi S; Hubbi B
    Acad Radiol; 2015 Mar; 22(3):290-5. PubMed ID: 25488695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Readability assessment of Internet-based patient education materials related to endoscopic sinus surgery.
    Cherla DV; Sanghvi S; Choudhry OJ; Liu JK; Eloy JA
    Laryngoscope; 2012 Aug; 122(8):1649-54. PubMed ID: 22685030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of the Readability of the Online Patient Education Materials of Intensive and Critical Care Societies.
    Hanci V; Otlu B; Biyikoğlu AS
    Crit Care Med; 2024 Feb; 52(2):e47-e57. PubMed ID: 37962133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Health Literacy in Clubfoot: A Quantitative Assessment of the Readability, Understandability and Actionability of Online Patient Education Material.
    Skalitzky MK; Gulbrandsen TR; Lorentzen W; Gao B; Shamrock AG; Weinstein SL; Morcuende JA
    Iowa Orthop J; 2021; 41(1):61-67. PubMed ID: 34552405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. IVC filter - assessing the readability and quality of patient information on the Internet.
    Ko TK; Yun Tan DJ; Hadeed S
    J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2024 Mar; 12(2):101695. PubMed ID: 37898304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Readability assessment of online ophthalmic patient information.
    Edmunds MR; Barry RJ; Denniston AK
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2013 Dec; 131(12):1610-6. PubMed ID: 24178035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Online Patient Information for Hysterectomies: A Systematic Environmental Scan of Quality and Readability.
    Jain M; Chkipov P; Stacey D; Posner G; Bacal V; Chen I
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2022 Aug; 44(8):870-876. PubMed ID: 35487458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing the readability and quality of online information on benign paroxysmal positional vertigo.
    Raja H; Almansoor ZR
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2024 Jan; 106(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 36748797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.
    Guo WJ; Wang WK; Xu D; Qiao Z; Shi YL; Luo P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Apr; 44(7):494-502. PubMed ID: 30234809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating the quality and readability of Internet information sources regarding the treatment of swallowing disorders.
    O'Connell Ferster AP; Hu A
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2017 Mar; 96(3):128-138. PubMed ID: 28346643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.