131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38874434)
1. Patient-reported outcomes after minimally invasive sacro-iliac joint surgery: a cohort study based on the Swedish Spine Registry.
Randers EM; Kibsgård TJ; Stuge B; Westberg A; Sigmundsson FG; Joelson A; Gerdhem P
Acta Orthop; 2024 Jun; 95():284-289. PubMed ID: 38874434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 1-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Conservative Management vs. Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment for Sacroiliac Joint Pain.
Dengler JD; Kools D; Pflugmacher R; Gasbarrini A; Prestamburgo D; Gaetani P; van Eeckhoven E; Cher D; Sturesson B
Pain Physician; 2017 Sep; 20(6):537-550. PubMed ID: 28934785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is the Oswestry Disability Index a valid measure of response to sacroiliac joint treatment?
Copay AG; Cher DJ
Qual Life Res; 2016 Feb; 25(2):283-292. PubMed ID: 26245709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Effect of the Severity of Preoperative Back Pain on Patient-Reported Outcomes, Recovery Ratios, and Patient Satisfaction Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MIS-TLIF).
Jacob KC; Patel MR; Parsons AW; Vanjani NN; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Singh K
World Neurosurg; 2021 Dec; 156():e254-e265. PubMed ID: 34583000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Effect of the Severity of Preoperative Disability on Patient-Reported Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction Following Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
Jacob KC; Patel MR; Collins AP; Ribot MA; Pawlowski H; Prabhu MC; Vanjani NN; Singh K
World Neurosurg; 2022 Mar; 159():e334-e346. PubMed ID: 34942388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Utility of minimum clinically important difference in assessing pain, disability, and health state after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
Parker SL; Adogwa O; Paul AR; Anderson WN; Aaronson O; Cheng JS; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 May; 14(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 21332281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Do measures of surgical effectiveness at 1 year after lumbar spine surgery accurately predict 2-year outcomes?
Adogwa O; Elsamadicy AA; Han JL; Cheng J; Karikari I; Bagley CA
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):689-696. PubMed ID: 26722957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. What Preoperative Factors are Associated With Not Achieving a Minimum Clinically Important Difference After THA? Findings from an International Multicenter Study.
Rojanasopondist P; Galea VP; Connelly JW; Matuszak SJ; Rolfson O; Bragdon CR; Malchau H
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Jun; 477(6):1301-1312. PubMed ID: 31136425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimally invasive versus open sacroiliac joint fusion: are they similarly safe and effective?
Ledonio CG; Polly DW; Swiontkowski MF
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Jun; 472(6):1831-8. PubMed ID: 24519569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.
Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Kerezoudis P; Glassman S; Foley K; Slotkin JR; Potts E; Shaffrey M; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly J; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk M; Asher AL; Bydon M
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E11. PubMed ID: 28760035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Six-month outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of minimally invasive SI joint fusion with triangular titanium implants vs conservative management.
Sturesson B; Kools D; Pflugmacher R; Gasbarrini A; Prestamburgo D; Dengler J
Eur Spine J; 2017 Mar; 26(3):708-719. PubMed ID: 27179664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Association Between Patient Reported Outcomes of Spinal Surgery and Societal Costs: A Register Based Study.
Hansson-Hedblom A; Jonsson E; Fritzell P; Hägg O; Borgström F
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Sep; 44(18):1309-1317. PubMed ID: 30985570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Defining the minimum clinically important difference for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: insights from the Quality Outcomes Database.
Asher AL; Kerezoudis P; Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Slotkin JR; Potts EA; Shaffrey ME; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Archer KR; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk MS; Bydon M
Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E2. PubMed ID: 29290132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Follow-up score, change score or percentage change score for determining clinical important outcome following surgery? An observational study from the Norwegian registry for Spine surgery evaluating patient reported outcome measures in lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.
Austevoll IM; Gjestad R; Grotle M; Solberg T; Brox JI; Hermansen E; Rekeland F; Indrekvam K; Storheim K; Hellum C
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Jan; 20(1):31. PubMed ID: 30658613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database, Part 1. Disability, quality of life, and pain outcomes following lumbar spine surgery: predicting likely individual patient outcomes for shared decision-making.
McGirt MJ; Bydon M; Archer KR; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Parker SL; Nian H; Harrell FE; Speroff T; Dittus RS; Philips SE; Shaffrey CI; Foley KT; Asher AL
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):357-369. PubMed ID: 28498074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of BMI on SI joint fusion outcomes: examining the evidence to improve insurance guidelines.
Dat KO; Cher D; Polly DW
Spine J; 2024 May; 24(5):783-790. PubMed ID: 38081463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion for chronic sacroiliac joint pain: a systematic review.
Chang E; Rains C; Ali R; Wines RC; Kahwati LC
Spine J; 2022 Aug; 22(8):1240-1253. PubMed ID: 35017057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis: 5-year follow-up from the prospective multicenter Quality Outcomes Database registry.
Chan AK; Bydon M; Bisson EF; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Shaffrey CI; Potts EA; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Wang MY; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Michalopoulos GD; Guan J; Haid RW; Agarwal N; Park C; Chou D; Mummaneni PV
Neurosurg Focus; 2023 Jan; 54(1):E2. PubMed ID: 36587409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent-segment disease.
Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau D; Adogwa O; Cheng JS; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jan; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 21962034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laminectomy alone versus fusion for grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis in 426 patients from the prospective Quality Outcomes Database.
Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Potts EA; Shaffrey CI; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Wang MY; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Chotai S; DiGiorgio AM; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Nov; 30(2):234-241. PubMed ID: 30544348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
