144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38875127)
41. Endometrial HLA-F expression is influenced by genotypes and correlates differently with immune cell infiltration in IVF and recurrent implantation failure patients.
Papúchová H; Saxtorph MH; Hallager T; Jepsen IE; Eriksen JO; Persson G; Funck T; Weisdorf I; Macklon NS; Larsen LG; Hviid TVF
Hum Reprod; 2022 Jul; 37(8):1816-1834. PubMed ID: 35689445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Evidence that the endometrial microbiota has an effect on implantation success or failure.
Moreno I; Codoñer FM; Vilella F; Valbuena D; Martinez-Blanch JF; Jimenez-Almazán J; Alonso R; Alamá P; Remohí J; Pellicer A; Ramon D; Simon C
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 215(6):684-703. PubMed ID: 27717732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The proliferative phase endometrium in IVF/ICSI: an in-cycle molecular analysis predictive of the outcome following fresh embryo transfer.
Mackens S; Santos-Ribeiro S; Racca A; Daneels D; Koch A; Essahib W; Verpoest W; Bourgain C; Van Riet I; Tournaye H; Brosens JJ; Lee YH; Blockeel C; Van de Velde H
Hum Reprod; 2020 Jan; 35(1):130-144. PubMed ID: 31916571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Assessing the endometrium: An update on current and potential novel biomarkers of receptivity.
Garratt J; Rahmati M
J Reprod Immunol; 2023 Dec; 160():104162. PubMed ID: 37871552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. One center experience with a personalized frozen-thawed embryo transfer in patients with recurrent implantation failure.
Edimiris P; Doehmen C; Baston-Buest DM; Kruessel JS; Bielfeld AP
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2023 Jul; 40(7):1639-1647. PubMed ID: 37261585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Regulation of endometrial receptivity by the highly expressed HOXA9, HOXA11 and HOXD10 HOX-class homeobox genes.
Xu B; Geerts D; Bu Z; Ai J; Jin L; Li Y; Zhang H; Zhu G
Hum Reprod; 2014 Apr; 29(4):781-90. PubMed ID: 24549215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. What is the contribution of embryo-endometrial asynchrony to implantation failure?
Teh WT; McBain J; Rogers P
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2016 Nov; 33(11):1419-1430. PubMed ID: 27480540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Increased AIF-1-mediated TNF-α expression during implantation phase in IVF cycles with GnRH antagonist protocol.
Xu B; Zhou M; Wang J; Zhang D; Guo F; Si C; Leung PCK; Zhang A
Hum Reprod; 2018 Jul; 33(7):1270-1280. PubMed ID: 29897458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Recent advances in understanding endometrial receptivity: molecular basis and clinical applications.
von Grothusen C; Lalitkumar S; Boggavarapu NR; Gemzell-Danielsson K; Lalitkumar PG
Am J Reprod Immunol; 2014 Aug; 72(2):148-57. PubMed ID: 24635108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Endometrial receptivity and pregnancy outcome.
Neykova K; Tosto V; Giardina I; Tsibizova V; Vakrilov G
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Jul; 35(13):2591-2605. PubMed ID: 32744104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Analysis of serum and endometrial progesterone in determining endometrial receptivity.
Labarta E; Sebastian-Leon P; Devesa-Peiro A; Celada P; Vidal C; Giles J; Rodriguez-Varela C; Bosch E; Diaz-Gimeno P
Hum Reprod; 2021 Oct; 36(11):2861-2870. PubMed ID: 34382075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. iTRAQ-based Proteomic Analysis Unveils ACSL4 as a Novel Potential Regulator of Human Endometrial Receptivity.
Hu S; Sun Z; Li B; Zhao H; Wang Y; Yao G; Li X; Bian X; Li TC; Vankelecom H; Sun Y
Endocrinology; 2023 Jan; 164(3):. PubMed ID: 36652382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. N-glycosylation of uterine endometrium determines its receptivity.
Yu M; Qin H; Wang H; Liu J; Liu S; Yan Q
J Cell Physiol; 2020 Feb; 235(2):1076-1089. PubMed ID: 31276203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Human S100A10 plays a crucial role in the acquisition of the endometrial receptivity phenotype.
Bissonnette L; Drissennek L; Antoine Y; Tiers L; Hirtz C; Lehmann S; Perrochia H; Bissonnette F; Kadoch IJ; Haouzi D; Hamamah S
Cell Adh Migr; 2016 May; 10(3):282-98. PubMed ID: 26760977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Transcriptome sequencing of endometrium revealed alterations in mRNAs and lncRNAs after ovarian stimulation.
Li L; Wang P; Liu S; Bai X; Zou B; Li Y
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2020 Jan; 37(1):21-32. PubMed ID: 31745762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Identifying biomarkers for predicting successful embryo implantation: applying single to multi-OMICs to improve reproductive outcomes.
Hernández-Vargas P; Muñoz M; Domínguez F
Hum Reprod Update; 2020 Feb; 26(2):264-301. PubMed ID: 32096829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Transcriptomic analysis and competing endogenous RNA network in the human endometrium between proliferative and mid-secretory phases.
Yu SL; Kim TH; Han YH; Kang Y; Jeong DU; Lee DC; Kang J; Park SR
Exp Ther Med; 2021 Jun; 21(6):660. PubMed ID: 33968190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Deciphering the proteomic signature of human endometrial receptivity.
Garrido-Gómez T; Quiñonero A; Antúnez O; Díaz-Gimeno P; Bellver J; Simón C; Domínguez F
Hum Reprod; 2014 Sep; 29(9):1957-67. PubMed ID: 25106620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Nomogram incorporating ultrasonic markers of endometrial receptivity to determine the embryo-endometrial synchrony after
He Q; Zhou Y; Zhou W; Mao C; Kang Q; Pan Y; Wang N; Zhong Y; Pan Z
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2022; 13():973306. PubMed ID: 36589827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
