These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
498 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38875597)
1. Beyond the Hype-The Actual Role and Risks of AI in Today's Medical Practice: Comparative-Approach Study. Hansen S; Brandt CJ; Søndergaard J JMIR AI; 2024 Jan; 3():e49082. PubMed ID: 38875597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Large Language Models in Hematology Case Solving: A Comparative Study of ChatGPT-3.5, Google Bard, and Microsoft Bing. Kumari A; Kumari A; Singh A; Singh SK; Juhi A; Dhanvijay AKD; Pinjar MJ; Mondal H Cureus; 2023 Aug; 15(8):e43861. PubMed ID: 37736448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Use of Generative AI for Scientific Literature Searches for Systematic Reviews: ChatGPT and Microsoft Bing AI Performance Evaluation. Gwon YN; Kim JH; Chung HS; Jung EJ; Chun J; Lee S; Shim SR JMIR Med Inform; 2024 May; 12():e51187. PubMed ID: 38771247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots on Glaucoma Questions Adapted From Patient Brochures. Yalla GR; Hyman N; Hock LE; Zhang Q; Shukla AG; Kolomeyer NN Cureus; 2024 Mar; 16(3):e56766. PubMed ID: 38650824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gemini AI vs. ChatGPT: A comprehensive examination alongside ophthalmology residents in medical knowledge. Bahir D; Zur O; Attal L; Nujeidat Z; Knaanie A; Pikkel J; Mimouni M; Plopsky G Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2024 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 39277830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the Performance of Generative AI Large Language Models ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Microsoft Bing Chat in Supporting Evidence-Based Dentistry: Comparative Mixed Methods Study. Giannakopoulos K; Kavadella A; Aaqel Salim A; Stamatopoulos V; Kaklamanos EG J Med Internet Res; 2023 Dec; 25():e51580. PubMed ID: 38009003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of ChatGPT-4 in Family Medicine Board Examinations Using Advanced AI Learning and Analytical Methods: Observational Study. Goodings AJ; Kajitani S; Chhor A; Albakri A; Pastrak M; Kodancha M; Ives R; Lee YB; Kajitani K JMIR Med Educ; 2024 Oct; 10():e56128. PubMed ID: 39378442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pilot Testing of a Tool to Standardize the Assessment of the Quality of Health Information Generated by Artificial Intelligence-Based Models. Sallam M; Barakat M; Sallam M Cureus; 2023 Nov; 15(11):e49373. PubMed ID: 38024074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating the Sensitivity, Specificity, and Accuracy of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, Bing AI, and Bard Against Conventional Drug-Drug Interactions Clinical Tools. Al-Ashwal FY; Zawiah M; Gharaibeh L; Abu-Farha R; Bitar AN Drug Healthc Patient Saf; 2023; 15():137-147. PubMed ID: 37750052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating Literature Reviews Conducted by Humans Versus ChatGPT: Comparative Study. Mostafapour M; Fortier JH; Pacheco K; Murray H; Garber G JMIR AI; 2024 Aug; 3():e56537. PubMed ID: 39159446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reference Hallucination Score for Medical Artificial Intelligence Chatbots: Development and Usability Study. Aljamaan F; Temsah MH; Altamimi I; Al-Eyadhy A; Jamal A; Alhasan K; Mesallam TA; Farahat M; Malki KH JMIR Med Inform; 2024 Jul; 12():e54345. PubMed ID: 39083799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy and usability of artificial intelligence chatbot generated chemotherapy protocols. Erdat EC; Yalciner M; Urun Y Future Oncol; 2024 Apr; ():1-6. PubMed ID: 38646965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating Microsoft Bing with ChatGPT-4 for the assessment of abdominal computed tomography and magnetic resonance images. Elek A; Ekizalioğlu DD; Güler E Diagn Interv Radiol; 2024 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 39155793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy of AI Chats to Determine an Emergency: A Comparison Between OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Microsoft Bing AI Chat. Zúñiga Salazar G; Zúñiga D; Vindel CL; Yoong AM; Hincapie S; Zúñiga AB; Zúñiga P; Salazar E; Zúñiga B Cureus; 2023 Sep; 15(9):e45473. PubMed ID: 37727841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Comparative Performance of Large Language Models on the Hand Surgery Self-Assessment Examination. Chen CJ; Sobol K; Hickey C; Raphael J Hand (N Y); 2024 Sep; ():15589447241279460. PubMed ID: 39324769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evidence-based potential of generative artificial intelligence large language models in orthodontics: a comparative study of ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Microsoft Bing. Makrygiannakis MA; Giannakopoulos K; Kaklamanos EG Eur J Orthod; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38613510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing the Efficacy of Large Language Models ChatGPT, BARD, and Bing AI in Providing Information on Rhinoplasty: An Observational Study. Seth I; Lim B; Xie Y; Cevik J; Rozen WM; Ross RJ; Lee M Aesthet Surg J Open Forum; 2023; 5():ojad084. PubMed ID: 37795257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Navigating the Landscape of Personalized Medicine: The Relevance of ChatGPT, BingChat, and Bard AI in Nephrology Literature Searches. Aiumtrakul N; Thongprayoon C; Suppadungsuk S; Krisanapan P; Miao J; Qureshi F; Cheungpasitporn W J Pers Med; 2023 Sep; 13(10):. PubMed ID: 37888068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Comparison of ChatGPT 3.5, Microsoft Bing, and Google Gemini for Diagnosing Cases of Neuro-Ophthalmology. Shukla R; Mishra AK; Banerjee N; Verma A Cureus; 2024 Apr; 16(4):e58232. PubMed ID: 38745784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Knowledge, Perceptions and Attitude of Researchers Towards Using ChatGPT in Research. Abdelhafiz AS; Ali A; Maaly AM; Ziady HH; Sultan EA; Mahgoub MA J Med Syst; 2024 Feb; 48(1):26. PubMed ID: 38411833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]