These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38875934)

  • 1. A syntactic evidence network model for fact verification.
    Chen Z; Hui SC; Zhuang F; Liao L; Jia M; Li J; Huang H
    Neural Netw; 2024 Jun; 178():106424. PubMed ID: 38875934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relation Extraction in Biomedical Texts Based on Multi-Head Attention Model With Syntactic Dependency Feature: Modeling Study.
    Li Y; Hui L; Zou L; Li H; Xu L; Wang X; Chua S
    JMIR Med Inform; 2022 Oct; 10(10):e41136. PubMed ID: 36264604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. BioByGANS: biomedical named entity recognition by fusing contextual and syntactic features through graph attention network in node classification framework.
    Zheng X; Du H; Luo X; Tong F; Song W; Zhao D
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Nov; 23(1):501. PubMed ID: 36418937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Extracting biomedical relation from cross-sentence text using syntactic dependency graph attention network.
    Zhou X; Fu Q; Chen J; Liu L; Wang Y; Lu Y; Wu H
    J Biomed Inform; 2023 Aug; 144():104445. PubMed ID: 37467835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Semantic Role Labeling of Clinical Text: Comparing Syntactic Parsers and Features.
    Zhang Y; Jiang M; Wang J; Xu H
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2016; 2016():1283-1292. PubMed ID: 28269926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading.
    Hoeks JC; Stowe LA; Doedens G
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Mar; 19(1):59-73. PubMed ID: 14972359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Integrating shortest dependency path and sentence sequence into a deep learning framework for relation extraction in clinical text.
    Li Z; Yang Z; Shen C; Xu J; Zhang Y; Xu H
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2019 Jan; 19(Suppl 1):22. PubMed ID: 30700301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Graph Convolutional Network-Based Method for Chemical-Protein Interaction Extraction: Algorithm Development.
    Wang E; Wang F; Yang Z; Wang L; Zhang Y; Lin H; Wang J
    JMIR Med Inform; 2020 May; 8(5):e17643. PubMed ID: 32348257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. CosG: A Graph-Based Contrastive Learning Method for Fact Verification.
    Chen C; Zheng J; Chen H
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 May; 21(10):. PubMed ID: 34065740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Document-Level Biomedical Relation Extraction Using Graph Convolutional Network and Multihead Attention: Algorithm Development and Validation.
    Wang J; Chen X; Zhang Y; Zhang Y; Wen J; Lin H; Yang Z; Wang X
    JMIR Med Inform; 2020 Jul; 8(7):e17638. PubMed ID: 32459636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Retrieval augmented scientific claim verification.
    Liu H; Soroush A; Nestor JG; Park E; Idnay B; Fang Y; Pan J; Liao S; Bernard M; Peng Y; Weng C
    JAMIA Open; 2024 Apr; 7(1):ooae021. PubMed ID: 38455840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Kcr-FLAT: A Chinese-Named Entity Recognition Model with Enhanced Semantic Information.
    Deng Z; Tao Y; Lan R; Yang R; Wang X
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Feb; 23(4):. PubMed ID: 36850367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of left temporo-parietal and inferior frontal cortex in comprehending syntactically complex sentences: A brain stimulation study.
    Krause CD; Fengler A; Pino D; Sehm B; Friederici AD; Obrig H
    Neuropsychologia; 2023 Feb; 180():108465. PubMed ID: 36586718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Syntactic and semantic contributions to sentence comprehension in agrammatism.
    Sherman JC; Schweickert J
    Brain Lang; 1989 Oct; 37(3):419-39. PubMed ID: 2478253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neural correlates of semantic-driven syntactic parsing in sentence comprehension.
    Zhang Y; Taft M; Tang J; Li L
    Neuroimage; 2024 Apr; 289():120543. PubMed ID: 38369168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Memory encoding of syntactic information involves domain-general attentional resources: Evidence from dual-task studies.
    Heyselaar E; Segaert K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jun; 72(6):1285-1296. PubMed ID: 30185125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A role for left inferior frontal and posterior superior temporal cortex in extracting a syntactic tree from a sentence.
    Pattamadilok C; Dehaene S; Pallier C
    Cortex; 2016 Feb; 75():44-55. PubMed ID: 26709465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What's left if the Jabberwock gets the semantics? An ERP investigation into semantic and syntactic processes during auditory sentence comprehension.
    Hahne A; Jescheniak JD
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2001 Apr; 11(2):199-212. PubMed ID: 11275482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mandarin Chinese L1 and L2 complex sentence reading reveals a consistent electrophysiological pattern of highly interactive syntactic and semantic processing: An ERP study.
    Chen L; Yang M; Gao F; Fang Z; Wang P; Feng L
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1143062. PubMed ID: 37151349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of syntactic and semantic argument structure on sentence repetition in agrammatism: Things we can learn from particles and prepositions.
    Kohen F; Milsark G; Martin N
    Aphasiology; 2011; 25(6-7):736-747. PubMed ID: 28133406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.