103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38876911)
1. Differentiating Benign From Malignant Ovarian Masses With Solid Components: Diagnostic Performance of CEUS Combined With IOTA Simple Rules and O-RADS.
Lu B; He W; Liu C; Wang P; Yang P; Zhao Z; Qi J; Huang B
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38876911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of IOTA Simple Rules, Simple Rules risk assessment, ADNEX model and O-RADS in differentiating between benign and malignant adnexal lesions in North American women.
Hiett AK; Sonek JD; Guy M; Reid TJ
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2022 May; 59(5):668-676. PubMed ID: 34533862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, IOTA simple rules and O-RADS for assessing the malignant risk of sonographically appearing solid ovarian masses.
Lu B; Liu C; Qi J; He W; Shi T; Zhu Y; Huang B
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2023 Apr; 52(4):102564. PubMed ID: 36868504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy of IOTA simple rules, O-RADS, and CA125 to distinguish benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Xie WT; Wang YQ; Xiang ZS; Du ZS; Huang SX; Chen YJ; Tang LN
J Ovarian Res; 2022 Jan; 15(1):15. PubMed ID: 35067220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasonography-Based Risk Models in Differentiating Between Benign and Malignant Ovarian Tumors in a US Cohort.
Yoeli-Bik R; Longman RE; Wroblewski K; Weigert M; Abramowicz JS; Lengyel E
JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Jul; 6(7):e2323289. PubMed ID: 37440228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic performance of IOTA SR and O-RADS combined with CA125, HE4, and risk of malignancy algorithm to distinguish benign and malignant adnexal masses.
Yang Y; Ju H; Huang Y
Eur J Radiol; 2023 Aug; 165():110926. PubMed ID: 37418798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A modified CEUS risk stratification model for adnexal masses with solid components: prospective multicenter study and risk adjustment.
Wu M; Zhang M; Qu E; Sun X; Zhang R; Mu L; Xiao L; Wen H; Wang R; Liu T; Meng X; Wu S; Chen Y; Su M; Wang Y; Gu J; Zhang X
Eur Radiol; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38374482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of the diagnostic performance of the O-RADS, RMI4, IOTA LR2, and IOTA SR systems by senior and junior doctors.
Guo Y; Zhao B; Zhou S; Wen L; Liu J; Fu Y; Xu F; Liu M
Ultrasonography; 2022 Jul; 41(3):511-518. PubMed ID: 35196832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. O-RADS combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound in risk stratification of adnexal masses.
Shi Y; Li H; Wu X; Li X; Yang M
J Ovarian Res; 2023 Aug; 16(1):153. PubMed ID: 37537697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Ultrasound Scores in Differentiating between Benign and Malignant Adnexal Masses.
Pelayo M; Pelayo-Delgado I; Sancho-Sauco J; Sanchez-Zurdo J; Abarca-Martinez L; Corraliza-Galán V; Martin-Gromaz C; Pablos-Antona MJ; Zurita-Calvo J; Alcázar JL
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Mar; 13(7):. PubMed ID: 37046525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Value of IOTA Simple Rules Combined With CEUS Scoring System in the Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Ovarian Masses and Its Correlation With MVD and VEGF: A Preliminary Study.
Liu C; Li Y; Zhu Y; Lu M
J Ultrasound Med; 2022 Dec; 41(12):2983-2992. PubMed ID: 35481545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of O-RADS, GI-RADS, and IOTA simple rules regarding malignancy rate, validity, and reliability for diagnosis of adnexal masses.
Basha MAA; Metwally MI; Gamil SA; Khater HM; Aly SA; El Sammak AA; Zaitoun MMA; Khattab EM; Azmy TM; Alayouty NA; Mohey N; Almassry HN; Yousef HY; Ibrahim SA; Mohamed EA; Mohamed AEM; Afifi AHM; Harb OA; Algazzar HY
Eur Radiol; 2021 Feb; 31(2):674-684. PubMed ID: 32809166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective external validation of IOTA three-step strategy for characterizing and classifying adnexal masses and retrospective assessment of alternative two-step strategy using simple-rules risk.
Hidalgo JJ; Ros F; Aubá M; Errasti T; Olartecoechea B; Ruiz-Zambrana Á; Alcázar JL
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 53(5):693-700. PubMed ID: 30353585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adnexal masses: Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound using the simple rules from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis group.
Xu A; Nie F; Liu T; Dong T; Bu L; Yang D
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2022 Jun; 157(3):568-573. PubMed ID: 34510439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The use of sonographic subjective tumor assessment, IOTA logistic regression model 1, IOTA Simple Rules and GI-RADS system in the preoperative prediction of malignancy in women with adnexal masses.
Koneczny J; Czekierdowski A; Florczak M; Poziemski P; Stachowicz N; Borowski D
Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(12):647-653. PubMed ID: 29303221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective comparative trial comparing O-RADS, IOTA ADNEX model, and RMI score for preoperative evaluation of adnexal masses for prediction of ovarian cancer.
Poonyakanok V; Tanmahasamut P; Jaishuen A
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2023 May; 49(5):1412-1417. PubMed ID: 36895122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. External Validation of the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) Lexicon and the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis 2-Step Strategy to Stratify Ovarian Tumors Into O-RADS Risk Groups.
Timmerman S; Valentin L; Ceusters J; Testa AC; Landolfo C; Sladkevicius P; Van Holsbeke C; Domali E; Fruscio R; Epstein E; Franchi D; Kudla MJ; Chiappa V; Alcazar JL; Leone FPG; Buonomo F; Coccia ME; Guerriero S; Deo N; Jokubkiene L; Kaijser J; Scambia G; Andreotti R; Timmerman D; Bourne T; Van Calster B; Froyman W
JAMA Oncol; 2023 Feb; 9(2):225-233. PubMed ID: 36520422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective external validation of IOTA methods for classifying adnexal masses and retrospective assessment of two-step strategy using benign descriptors and ADNEX: a Portuguese multicenter study.
Borges AL; Brito M; Ambrósio P; Condeço R; Pinto P; Ambrósio B; Mahomed F; Gama JMR; Bernardo MJ; Gouveia AI; Djokovic D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38477149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Characterization of adnexal lesions using photoacoustic imaging to improve sonographic O-RADS risk assessment.
Zhu Q; Luo H; Middleton WD; Itani M; Hagemann IS; Hagemann AR; Hoegger MJ; Thaker PH; Kuroki LM; MCourt CK; Mutch DG; Powell MA; Siegel CL
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Dec; 62(6):891-903. PubMed ID: 37606287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of International Ovarian Tumor Analysis ADNEX model and Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System with final histological diagnosis in adnexal masses: a retrospective study.
Filiz AA; Kahyaoglu S; Atalay CR
Obstet Gynecol Sci; 2024 Jan; 67(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 37822234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
