These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38877219)

  • 1. Unease as US drug agency weighs its use of independent scientists.
    Kozlov M
    Nature; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38877219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Defending the scientific integrity of conservation-policy processes.
    Carroll C; Hartl B; Goldman GT; Rohlf DJ; Treves A; Kerr JT; Ritchie EG; Kingsford RT; Gibbs KE; Maron M; Watson JEM
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Oct; 31(5):967-975. PubMed ID: 28741747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceived losses of scientific integrity under the Trump administration: A survey of federal scientists.
    Goldman GT; Carter JM; Wang Y; Larson JM
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0231929. PubMed ID: 32324823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Americans' views of scientists' motivations for scientific work.
    Johnson BB; Dieckmann NF
    Public Underst Sci; 2020 Jan; 29(1):2-20. PubMed ID: 31621505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evolving research misconduct policies and their significance for physical scientists.
    Dooley JJ; Kerch HM
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2000 Jan; 6(1):109-21. PubMed ID: 11273428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Scientific authority in policy contexts: Public attitudes about environmental scientists, medical researchers, and economists.
    O'Brien TL
    Public Underst Sci; 2013 Oct; 22(7):799-816. PubMed ID: 24048622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Counted at last: US federal agency to pilot PhD survey with questions on LGBT+ scientists.
    Heidt A
    Nature; 2023 May; ():. PubMed ID: 37173448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Democratizing social scientists' impact on federal policy: Using the evidence act to help government and ourselves.
    Ciocca Eller C
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2024 Mar; 121(13):e2306890121. PubMed ID: 38457516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biden's pick to head US environment agency heartens scientists.
    Tollefson J
    Nature; 2020 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 33340020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Shaping science policy in Europe.
    Celis JE; Gago JM
    Mol Oncol; 2014 May; 8(3):447-57. PubMed ID: 24726457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lay beliefs about scientists' relations with their employers.
    Johnson BB; Dieckmann NF
    Public Underst Sci; 2021 Jan; 30(1):103-114. PubMed ID: 33103590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Food for thought?: the relations between the Royal Society Food Committee and government, 1915-19.
    Hull AJ
    Ann Sci; 2002 Jul; 59(3):263-98. PubMed ID: 12164204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Two scientists will replace disgraced US science adviser Eric Lander.
    Wolf L; Tollefson J; Maxmen A
    Nature; 2022 Mar; 603(7899):21. PubMed ID: 35177847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. US energy agency strengthens protections for scientists.
    Ross E
    Nature; 2017 Jan; 541(7637):272. PubMed ID: 28102277
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does 'existential unease' predict adult multimorbidity? Analytical cohort study on embodiment based on the Norwegian HUNT population.
    Tomasdottir MO; Sigurdsson JA; Petursson H; Kirkengen AL; Ivar Lund Nilsen T; Hetlevik I; Getz L
    BMJ Open; 2016 Nov; 6(11):e012602. PubMed ID: 27852715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On being a whistleblower: the Needleman case.
    Ernhart CB; Scarr S; Geneson DF
    Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(1):73-93. PubMed ID: 11653083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scientists strongly back Joe Biden for US president in Nature poll.
    Viglione G
    Nature; 2020 Oct; 586(7831):654. PubMed ID: 33097849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. When enough data are not enough to enact policy: The failure to ban chlorpyrifos.
    Trasande L
    PLoS Biol; 2017 Dec; 15(12):e2003671. PubMed ID: 29267272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Public perceptions of federal science advisory boards depend on their composition.
    Drummond C; Gray SG; Raimi KT; Wilson R; Árvai J
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Sep; 117(37):22668-22670. PubMed ID: 32868425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Public perceptions of scientific advice: toward a science savvy public culture?
    Schultz É; Ward JK
    Public Health; 2021 May; 194():86-88. PubMed ID: 33866149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.