These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

401 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38877432)

  • 1. YouTube/ Bilibili/ TikTok videos as sources of medical information on laryngeal carcinoma: cross-sectional content analysis study.
    Liu Z; Chen Y; Lin Y; Ai M; Lian D; Zhang Y; Shen Y; Yu F
    BMC Public Health; 2024 Jun; 24(1):1594. PubMed ID: 38877432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality and Reliability of Liver Cancer-Related Short Chinese Videos on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Content Analysis Study.
    Zheng S; Tong X; Wan D; Hu C; Hu Q; Ke Q
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Jul; 25():e47210. PubMed ID: 37405825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bilibili, TikTok, and YouTube as sources of information on gastric cancer: assessment and analysis of the content and quality.
    Wang M; Yao N; Wang J; Chen W; Ouyang Y; Xie C
    BMC Public Health; 2024 Jan; 24(1):57. PubMed ID: 38166928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. TikTok and Bilibili as sources of information on Helicobacter pylori in China: A content and quality analysis.
    Du RC; Zhang Y; Wang MH; Lu NH; Hu Y
    Helicobacter; 2023 Oct; 28(5):e13007. PubMed ID: 37452727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of the reliability and quality of breast cancer related videos on TikTok and Bilibili: cross-sectional study in China.
    Liu H; Peng J; Li L; Deng A; Huang X; Yin G; Ming J; Luo H; Liang Y
    Front Public Health; 2023; 11():1296386. PubMed ID: 38317686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. TikTok and YouTube as sources of information on anal fissure: A comparative analysis.
    Chen Z; Pan S; Zuo S
    Front Public Health; 2022; 10():1000338. PubMed ID: 36407987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is the information about orthodontics on Youtube and TikTok reliable for the oral health of the public? A cross sectional comparative study.
    Kılınç DD
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Oct; 123(5):e349-e354. PubMed ID: 35470122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Quality of Short Videos as a Source of Coronary Heart Disease Information on TikTok: Cross-Sectional Study.
    Gong X; Chen M; Ning L; Zeng L; Dong B
    JMIR Form Res; 2024 Sep; 8():e51513. PubMed ID: 39226540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality Assessment of TikTok as a Source of Information About Mitral Valve Regurgitation in China: Cross-Sectional Study.
    Cui N; Lu Y; Cao Y; Chen X; Fu S; Su Q
    J Med Internet Res; 2024 Aug; 26():e55403. PubMed ID: 39163110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The quality and reliability of short videos about thyroid nodules on BiliBili and TikTok: Cross-sectional study.
    Chen Y; Wang Q; Huang X; Zhang Y; Li Y; Ni T; Pan G; Luo D; Ni Y
    Digit Health; 2024; 10():20552076241288831. PubMed ID: 39381823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is TikTok a high-quality source of information on thyroid cancer?
    Yang S; Zhan J; Xu X
    Endocrine; 2023 Aug; 81(2):270-276. PubMed ID: 36840912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How much information regarding gingival enlargement can we get from TikTok and YouTube?
    Bengi VU; Saraç Atagün Ö; Ceylan Şen S; Özcan E; Paksoy T; Güler ÖŞ
    Spec Care Dentist; 2024; 44(4):1115-1125. PubMed ID: 38177079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality of Information in Gallstone Disease Videos on TikTok: Cross-sectional Study.
    Sun F; Zheng S; Wu J
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Feb; 25():e39162. PubMed ID: 36753307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Reliability and Quality of YouTube Videos as a Source of Public Health Information Regarding COVID-19 Vaccination: Cross-sectional Study.
    Chan C; Sounderajah V; Daniels E; Acharya A; Clarke J; Yalamanchili S; Normahani P; Markar S; Ashrafian H; Darzi A
    JMIR Public Health Surveill; 2021 Jul; 7(7):e29942. PubMed ID: 34081599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Video quality of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease on TikTok: A cross-sectional study.
    Cheng D; Ren K; Gao X; Li K; Wu P; Yang R; Cui T; Song K; Yu J
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2024 Aug; 103(34):e39330. PubMed ID: 39183399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing quality and reliability of online videos on tachycardia: a YouTube video-based study.
    Li Z; Yan C; Lyu X; Li F; Zeng R
    BMC Public Health; 2024 Sep; 24(1):2620. PubMed ID: 39334090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cross-sectional and comparative analysis of videos on erectile dysfunction treatment on YouTube and TikTok.
    Babar M; Loloi J; Patel RD; Singh S; Azhar U; Maria P; Small A; Watts K
    Andrologia; 2022 Jun; 54(5):e14392. PubMed ID: 35122283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Douyin and Bilibili as sources of information on lung cancer in China through assessment and analysis of the content and quality.
    Zeng F; Zhang W; Wang M; Zhang H; Zhu X; Hu H
    Sci Rep; 2024 Sep; 14(1):20604. PubMed ID: 39232044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the quality of breast cancer-related videos on TikTok: A cross-sectional study.
    Qu Y; Lian J; Pan B; Zhang J; Zhou Y
    Digit Health; 2024; 10():20552076241277688. PubMed ID: 39224798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The status quo of short video as sources of health information on gastroesophageal reflux disease in China: a cross-sectional study.
    Cai Y; Zeng H; Yang P; Xu X; Lai Y; Zhou Y
    Front Public Health; 2024; 12():1400749. PubMed ID: 38864023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.