These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38877524)

  • 1. Comparative analysis of two methods in circumcision: a new disposable device versus classic sleeve technique.
    Kılıç S
    BMC Urol; 2024 Jun; 24(1):126. PubMed ID: 38877524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of NeoAlis™ disposable circumcision device and sleeve technique in circumcision: Results from a referral health-care center in Turkey.
    Micoogullari U; Yildirim M; Gol IH; Cakici OU
    J Pediatr Urol; 2021 Dec; 17(6):856.e1-856.e10. PubMed ID: 34696964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Application of a novel disposable suture device in circumcision: a prospective non-randomized controlled study.
    Zhang Z; Yang B; Yu W; Han Y; Xu Z; Chen H; Chen Y; Dai Y
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2016 Apr; 48(4):465-73. PubMed ID: 26797875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [A novel disposable ring versus the suture device in circumcision].
    Zhao YJ; Zhan PC; Chen Q; Cheng W; Ye FZ; Wang YS; Wang JJ; Tang ZM
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2017 Dec; 23(12):1093-1098. PubMed ID: 29738180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Circumcision devices versus standard surgical techniques in adolescent and adult male circumcisions.
    Hohlfeld A; Ebrahim S; Shaik MZ; Kredo T
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 Mar; 3(3):CD012250. PubMed ID: 33786810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Comparative Study on the Clinical Efficacy of Two Different Disposable Circumcision Suture Devices in Adult Males.
    Shen J; Shi J; Gao J; Wang N; Tang J; Yu B; Wang W; Wang R
    Urol J; 2017 Aug; 14(5):5013-5017. PubMed ID: 28853107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [A novel disposable circumcision device versus conventional surgery in the treatment of redundant prepuce and phimosis].
    Zhao YJ; Zhan PC; Chen Q; Cheng W; Ye FZ; Wang YS; Wang JJ; Li JH; Tang ZM
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2017 Nov; 23(11):1007-1013. PubMed ID: 29738167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Surgical plane positioning with a disposable circumcision suture device for the treatment of phimosis and redundant prepuce].
    Han YF; Jiang HS; Wang JL; Chong W; Chen H; Xu ZP; Chen Y
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2018 May; 24(5):404-408. PubMed ID: 30171754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Modified circumcision with a disposable suture device].
    Ren Y; Yan JJ
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2015 Jun; 21(6):541-4. PubMed ID: 26242046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Introducing the Quill™ device for modified sleeve circumcision with subcutaneous suture: a retrospective study of 70 cases.
    Gu C; Tian F; Jia Z; Li G; Meng Z; Xing W; Ding Y; Jin Z; Kan Q; Yang J
    Urol Int; 2015; 94(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 25677813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modified Circumcision Using the Disposable Circumcision Suture Device in Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Rao JM; Huang H; Chen T; Yang CG; Pan CZ; Deng GC; Shen LJ; Qian XH; Peng MK; Zhou HD; Peng HL
    Urology; 2020 Sep; 143():206-211. PubMed ID: 32593627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Circumcision with a novel disposable device in Chinese children: a randomized controlled trial.
    Pan F; Pan L; Zhang A; Liu Y; Zhang F; Dai Y
    Int J Urol; 2013 Feb; 20(2):220-6. PubMed ID: 22974480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Frenulum identification positioning with a disposable suture device in circumcision to prevent postoperative penile frenulum malposition].
    Huang YQ; Zheng J; Zhou XX; Yao ZM; Zhang T; Shao QF; Wu ZG
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2017 May; 23(5):422-426. PubMed ID: 29717832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pediatric sutureless circumcision: an effective and cost efficient alternative.
    Voznesensky M; Mutter C; Hayn M; Kinkead T; Jumper B
    Can J Urol; 2015 Oct; 22(5):7995-9. PubMed ID: 26432971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Shang Ring versus disposable circumcision suture device in the treatment of phimosis or redundant prepuce].
    Wang SX; Zhang ZB; Yang SF; Yang EM; Pan DS; Xie XQ; Lin XH; Yang MY
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2016 Jun; 22(6):534-537. PubMed ID: 28963844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Disposable circumcision suture device: clinical effect and patient satisfaction.
    Lv BD; Zhang SG; Zhu XW; Zhang J; Chen G; Chen MF; Shen HL; Pei ZJ; Chen ZD
    Asian J Androl; 2014; 16(3):453-6. PubMed ID: 24759586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of two surgical circumcision procedures on postoperative pain: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study.
    Karakoyunlu N; Polat R; Aydin GB; Ergil J; Akkaya T; Ersoy H
    J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Jun; 11(3):124.e1-5. PubMed ID: 25842991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Shang Ring, sleeve and conventional circumcisions for redundant prepuce and phimosis: A comparative study of 918 cases].
    Wang R; Chen WJ; Shi WH; Xue YF
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2013 Apr; 19(4):332-6. PubMed ID: 23678713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimally invasive circumcision with a novel plastic clamp technique: a review of 7,500 cases.
    Senel FM; Demirelli M; Oztek S
    Pediatr Surg Int; 2010 Jul; 26(7):739-45. PubMed ID: 20532526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [A comparative study of three different circumcision devices for redundant prepuce and phimosis].
    Zhang M; Wei LJ
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2021 Aug; 27(8):729-732. PubMed ID: 34914246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.