These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3887896)

  • 1. Comparison of sonicated and nonsonicated specimens for the isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Warford AL; Carter TL; Levy RA; Rekrut KA
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1985 May; 83(5):625-9. PubMed ID: 3887896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Taking cell cultures to the patient in an attempt to improve chlamydial isolation.
    Ngeow YF; Munday PE; Evans RT; Taylor-Robinson D
    Br J Vener Dis; 1981 Feb; 57(1):44-6. PubMed ID: 7008897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pooled specimens for Chlamydia trachomatis: new approach to increase yield and cost efficiency.
    Manuel AR; Veeravahu M; Matthews RS; Clay JC
    Genitourin Med; 1987 Jun; 63(3):172-5. PubMed ID: 3111980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improved method for isolation and growth of Chlamydia trachomatis in McCoy cells treated with cycloheximide using polyethylene glycol.
    Mohammed NR; Hillary IB
    J Clin Pathol; 1985 Sep; 38(9):1052-4. PubMed ID: 3900144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Chlamydia trachomatis: detection using a direct test and culture in 100 genital specimens].
    Dutilh B; Bebear C
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1985; 43(3):275-8. PubMed ID: 3896054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of differences in specimen processing and passage technique on recovery of Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Jones RB; Van Der Pol B; Katz BP
    J Clin Microbiol; 1989 May; 27(5):894-8. PubMed ID: 2745697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Results of attempted isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis in 2,000 specimens (author's transl)].
    Ardoin P; Pradier T; Edlinger E
    Sem Hop; 1982 Jun; 58(24):1477-9. PubMed ID: 6287614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis inclusions in Mccoy cell cultures with fluorescein-conjugated monoclonal antibodies.
    Stamm WE; Tam M; Koester M; Cles L
    J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Apr; 17(4):666-8. PubMed ID: 6189852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis inclusions in McCoy and HeLa-229 cells: an alternative staining technique using toluidine blue.
    Mohammed NR; Hillary IB
    J Clin Pathol; 1984 Jun; 37(6):682-5. PubMed ID: 6202722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of cervical, urethral, and urine specimens for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in women.
    Sellors JW; Mahony JB; Jang D; Pickard L; Goldsmith CH; Gafni A; Chernesky MA
    J Infect Dis; 1991 Jul; 164(1):205-8. PubMed ID: 2056207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of direct immunofluorescent staining and an enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay for identifying Chlamydia trachomatis in cervical and urethral specimens.
    Wiesmeier E; Bruckner DA; Malotte CK; Downie A
    J Reprod Med; 1989 Aug; 34(8):517-9. PubMed ID: 2681749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sensitivity of immunofluorescence with monoclonal antibodies for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis inclusions in cell culture.
    Stephens RS; Kuo CC; Tam MR
    J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Jul; 16(1):4-7. PubMed ID: 6179965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chlamydia trachomatis PCR (Cobas Amplicor) in women: endocervical specimen transported in a specimen of urine versus endocervical and urethral specimens in 2-SP medium versus urine specimen only.
    Airell A; Ottosson L; Bygdeman SM; Carlberg H; Lidbrink P; Rudén AK; Elfgren K
    Int J STD AIDS; 2000 Oct; 11(10):651-8. PubMed ID: 11057936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microtest procedure for isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Yoder BL; Stamm WE; Koester CM; Alexander ER
    J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Jun; 13(6):1036-9. PubMed ID: 7019235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sensitivity of mitomycin-C treated McCoy cells for isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis from genital specimens.
    Woodland RM; Kirton RP; Darougar S
    Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1987 Dec; 6(6):653-6. PubMed ID: 3126059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multiple site sampling does not increase the sensitivity of Chlamydia trachomatis detection in infertility patients.
    Dietrich W; Rath M; Stanek G; Apfalter P; Huber JC; Tempfer C
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Jan; 93(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 18990379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Toxic effect of sampling swabs and transportation test tubes on the formation of intracytoplasmic inclusions of Chlamydia trachomatis in McCoy cell cultures.
    Mårdh PA; Zeeberg B
    Br J Vener Dis; 1981 Aug; 57(4):268-72. PubMed ID: 6268242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Molecular diagnostics. The polymerase chain reaction and its use in the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae.
    Uhrin M
    Gac Med Mex; 1997; 133 Suppl 1():133-7. PubMed ID: 9504115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women.
    Johannisson G; Löwhagen GB; Lycke E
    Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Dec; 56(6):671-5. PubMed ID: 6777719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by nucleic acid amplification testing: our evaluation suggests that CDC-recommended approaches for confirmatory testing are ill-advised.
    Schachter J; Chow JM; Howard H; Bolan G; Moncada J
    J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Jul; 44(7):2512-7. PubMed ID: 16825373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.