98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3887896)
1. Comparison of sonicated and nonsonicated specimens for the isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis.
Warford AL; Carter TL; Levy RA; Rekrut KA
Am J Clin Pathol; 1985 May; 83(5):625-9. PubMed ID: 3887896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Taking cell cultures to the patient in an attempt to improve chlamydial isolation.
Ngeow YF; Munday PE; Evans RT; Taylor-Robinson D
Br J Vener Dis; 1981 Feb; 57(1):44-6. PubMed ID: 7008897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pooled specimens for Chlamydia trachomatis: new approach to increase yield and cost efficiency.
Manuel AR; Veeravahu M; Matthews RS; Clay JC
Genitourin Med; 1987 Jun; 63(3):172-5. PubMed ID: 3111980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improved method for isolation and growth of Chlamydia trachomatis in McCoy cells treated with cycloheximide using polyethylene glycol.
Mohammed NR; Hillary IB
J Clin Pathol; 1985 Sep; 38(9):1052-4. PubMed ID: 3900144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Chlamydia trachomatis: detection using a direct test and culture in 100 genital specimens].
Dutilh B; Bebear C
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1985; 43(3):275-8. PubMed ID: 3896054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of differences in specimen processing and passage technique on recovery of Chlamydia trachomatis.
Jones RB; Van Der Pol B; Katz BP
J Clin Microbiol; 1989 May; 27(5):894-8. PubMed ID: 2745697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Results of attempted isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis in 2,000 specimens (author's transl)].
Ardoin P; Pradier T; Edlinger E
Sem Hop; 1982 Jun; 58(24):1477-9. PubMed ID: 6287614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis inclusions in Mccoy cell cultures with fluorescein-conjugated monoclonal antibodies.
Stamm WE; Tam M; Koester M; Cles L
J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Apr; 17(4):666-8. PubMed ID: 6189852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis inclusions in McCoy and HeLa-229 cells: an alternative staining technique using toluidine blue.
Mohammed NR; Hillary IB
J Clin Pathol; 1984 Jun; 37(6):682-5. PubMed ID: 6202722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of cervical, urethral, and urine specimens for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in women.
Sellors JW; Mahony JB; Jang D; Pickard L; Goldsmith CH; Gafni A; Chernesky MA
J Infect Dis; 1991 Jul; 164(1):205-8. PubMed ID: 2056207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of direct immunofluorescent staining and an enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay for identifying Chlamydia trachomatis in cervical and urethral specimens.
Wiesmeier E; Bruckner DA; Malotte CK; Downie A
J Reprod Med; 1989 Aug; 34(8):517-9. PubMed ID: 2681749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sensitivity of immunofluorescence with monoclonal antibodies for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis inclusions in cell culture.
Stephens RS; Kuo CC; Tam MR
J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Jul; 16(1):4-7. PubMed ID: 6179965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Chlamydia trachomatis PCR (Cobas Amplicor) in women: endocervical specimen transported in a specimen of urine versus endocervical and urethral specimens in 2-SP medium versus urine specimen only.
Airell A; Ottosson L; Bygdeman SM; Carlberg H; Lidbrink P; Rudén AK; Elfgren K
Int J STD AIDS; 2000 Oct; 11(10):651-8. PubMed ID: 11057936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Microtest procedure for isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis.
Yoder BL; Stamm WE; Koester CM; Alexander ER
J Clin Microbiol; 1981 Jun; 13(6):1036-9. PubMed ID: 7019235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sensitivity of mitomycin-C treated McCoy cells for isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis from genital specimens.
Woodland RM; Kirton RP; Darougar S
Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1987 Dec; 6(6):653-6. PubMed ID: 3126059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multiple site sampling does not increase the sensitivity of Chlamydia trachomatis detection in infertility patients.
Dietrich W; Rath M; Stanek G; Apfalter P; Huber JC; Tempfer C
Fertil Steril; 2010 Jan; 93(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 18990379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Toxic effect of sampling swabs and transportation test tubes on the formation of intracytoplasmic inclusions of Chlamydia trachomatis in McCoy cell cultures.
Mårdh PA; Zeeberg B
Br J Vener Dis; 1981 Aug; 57(4):268-72. PubMed ID: 6268242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Molecular diagnostics. The polymerase chain reaction and its use in the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae.
Uhrin M
Gac Med Mex; 1997; 133 Suppl 1():133-7. PubMed ID: 9504115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women.
Johannisson G; Löwhagen GB; Lycke E
Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Dec; 56(6):671-5. PubMed ID: 6777719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by nucleic acid amplification testing: our evaluation suggests that CDC-recommended approaches for confirmatory testing are ill-advised.
Schachter J; Chow JM; Howard H; Bolan G; Moncada J
J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Jul; 44(7):2512-7. PubMed ID: 16825373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
