These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3887896)

  • 41. [Chlamydia trachomatis in patients with genital contact infections in Austria--studies of 3,367 patients].
    Stary A; Söltz-Szöts J; Stary J; Gross W
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1986 Oct; 98(20):679-83. PubMed ID: 3538672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Clinical and laboratory considerations of culture vs antigen assays for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis from genital specimens.
    Kellogg JA
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1989 May; 113(5):453-60. PubMed ID: 2653270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Improved isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis from a low-prevalence population by using polyethylene glycol.
    Gibson JP; Egerer RM; Wiedbrauk DL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Feb; 31(2):292-5. PubMed ID: 8432814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in the urogenital tract].
    Korb J; Melcrová K; Poddaná B; Kastánková V; Kos M
    Cas Lek Cesk; 1984 Jun; 123(22):674-7. PubMed ID: 6744382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Dual sampling for the detection of female Chlamydia trachomatis infection with a polymerase chain reaction test.
    Watson PG; Wilson BH
    Int J STD AIDS; 2004 Mar; 15(3):189-91. PubMed ID: 15038866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparison of the ligase chain reaction with cell culture for the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women.
    Ridgway GL; Mumtaz G; Robinson AJ; Franchini M; Carder C; Burczak J; Lee H
    J Clin Pathol; 1996 Feb; 49(2):116-9. PubMed ID: 8655675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Enzyme amplified immunoassay: a novel technique applied to direct detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in clinical specimens.
    Pugh SF; Slack RC; Caul EO; Paul ID; Appleton PN; Gatley S
    J Clin Pathol; 1985 Oct; 38(10):1139-41. PubMed ID: 3902899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A comparison of cytobrush and cotton swab sampling for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by cell culture.
    Lees MI; Newnan DM; Plackett M; Traynor PW; Forsyth JR; Garland SM
    Genitourin Med; 1990 Aug; 66(4):267-9. PubMed ID: 2202656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Chlamydia trachomatis in routine cervical smears. A microscopic and ultrastructural analysis.
    Henry MR; de Mesy Jensen KL; Skoglund CD; Armstrong DW
    Acta Cytol; 1993; 37(3):343-52. PubMed ID: 8388608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Evaluation of the Amplicor Chlamydia trachomatis test versus culture in genital samples in various prevalence populations.
    de Barbeyrac B; Pellet I; Dutilh B; Bébéar C; Dumon B; Géniaux M; Bébéar C
    Genitourin Med; 1994 Jun; 70(3):162-6. PubMed ID: 8039778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparison of polymerase chain reaction and culture techniques for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Tabrizi SN; Lees MI; Garland SM
    Mol Cell Probes; 1993 Oct; 7(5):357-60. PubMed ID: 8264669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Cervical, urine and vaginal specimens for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by ligase chain reaction in women: a comparison.
    Hjelm E; Hallén A; Domeika M
    Acta Derm Venereol; 2001; 81(4):285-8. PubMed ID: 11720178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis among conscripts. A comparative study of urine samples and urethral swabs].
    Søgaard P; Møller BR; Thorsen P; Nissen LR; Pedersen S; Kargo JC; Jensen AM
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1996 Feb; 158(6):759-63. PubMed ID: 8638314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis from urethral scrapings of men.
    Sádecký E; Miklásová J; Zambor M; Urvölgyi J; Kovácová E; Brezina R
    Acta Microbiol Hung; 1984; 31(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 6380196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Chlamydia trachomatis among sexually active teenage girls: influence of sampling location and clinical signs on the detection rate.
    Rahm VA; Odlind V; Gnarpe H
    Genitourin Med; 1990 Apr; 66(2):66-9. PubMed ID: 2341144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis: comparison of agar-gel precipitin test and enzyme immunoassay.
    Irokanulo EA; Akueshi CO; Makinde AA
    Med Lab Sci; 1991 Apr; 48(2):118-21. PubMed ID: 1943537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Chlamydia trachomatis--epidemiologic data from the outpatient department of obstetrics/gynecology of the University of Tübingen/Germany].
    Hoyme UB
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1983 Jun; 43(6):363-5. PubMed ID: 6554208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital specimens by the Microtrak direct specimen test.
    Coudron PE; Fedorko DP; Dawson MS; Kaplowitz LG; Brookman RR; Dalton HP; Davis BA
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1986 Jan; 85(1):89-92. PubMed ID: 3510051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Self-collection of specimens for nucleic acid-based diagnosis of pharyngeal, cervicovaginal, urethral, and rectal Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis infections.
    Levy V; Blackmore CS; Klausner JD
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 903():407-18. PubMed ID: 22782835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Detection of C trachomatis in urogenital specimens by polymerase chain reaction.
    Näher H; Drzonek H; Wolf J; von Knebel Doeberitz M; Petzoldt D
    Genitourin Med; 1991 Jun; 67(3):211-4. PubMed ID: 2071122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.