These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38879079)

  • 1. Deep Learning for Grading Endometrial Cancer.
    Goyal M; Tafe LJ; Feng JX; Muller KE; Hondelink L; Bentz JL; Hassanpour S
    Am J Pathol; 2024 Sep; 194(9):1701-1711. PubMed ID: 38879079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Endometrial Carcinoma Diagnosis: Use of FIGO Grading and Genomic Subcategories in Clinical Practice: Recommendations of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.
    Soslow RA; Tornos C; Park KJ; Malpica A; Matias-Guiu X; Oliva E; Parkash V; Carlson J; McCluggage WG; Gilks CB
    Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2019 Jan; 38 Suppl 1(Iss 1 Suppl 1):S64-S74. PubMed ID: 30550484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interpretable deep learning model to predict the molecular classification of endometrial cancer from haematoxylin and eosin-stained whole-slide images: a combined analysis of the PORTEC randomised trials and clinical cohorts.
    Fremond S; Andani S; Barkey Wolf J; Dijkstra J; Melsbach S; Jobsen JJ; Brinkhuis M; Roothaan S; Jurgenliemk-Schulz I; Lutgens LCHW; Nout RA; van der Steen-Banasik EM; de Boer SM; Powell ME; Singh N; Mileshkin LR; Mackay HJ; Leary A; Nijman HW; Smit VTHBM; Creutzberg CL; Horeweg N; Koelzer VH; Bosse T
    Lancet Digit Health; 2023 Feb; 5(2):e71-e82. PubMed ID: 36496303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Genomic Heterogeneity of FIGO Grade 3 Endometrioid Carcinoma Impacts Diagnostic Accuracy and Reproducibility.
    Hussein YR; Broaddus R; Weigelt B; Levine DA; Soslow RA
    Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2016 Jan; 35(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 26166718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A binary architectural grading system for uterine endometrial endometrioid carcinoma has superior reproducibility compared with FIGO grading and identifies subsets of advance-stage tumors with favorable and unfavorable prognosis.
    Lax SF; Kurman RJ; Pizer ES; Wu L; Ronnett BM
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2000 Sep; 24(9):1201-8. PubMed ID: 10976693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Issues in the Differential Diagnosis of Uterine Low-grade Endometrioid Carcinoma, Including Mixed Endometrial Carcinomas: Recommendations from the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.
    Rabban JT; Gilks CB; Malpica A; Matias-Guiu X; Mittal K; Mutter GL; Oliva E; Parkash V; Ronnett BM; Staats P; Stewart CJR; McCluggage WG
    Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2019 Jan; 38 Suppl 1(Iss 1 Suppl 1):S25-S39. PubMed ID: 30550482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Etiologic heterogeneity in endometrial cancer: evidence from a Gynecologic Oncology Group trial.
    Brinton LA; Felix AS; McMeekin DS; Creasman WT; Sherman ME; Mutch D; Cohn DE; Walker JL; Moore RG; Downs LS; Soslow RA; Zaino R
    Gynecol Oncol; 2013 May; 129(2):277-84. PubMed ID: 23485770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Deep Learning Models Differentiate Tumor Grades from H&E Stained Histology Sections.
    Khoshdeli M; Borowsky A; Parvin B
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():620-623. PubMed ID: 30440473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development and Validation of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Platform for Prostate Cancer Grading and Quantification.
    Huang W; Randhawa R; Jain P; Iczkowski KA; Hu R; Hubbard S; Eickhoff J; Basu H; Roy R
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Nov; 4(11):e2132554. PubMed ID: 34730818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Incidence and effects on mortality of venous thromboembolism in elderly women with endometrial cancer.
    Rauh-Hain JA; Hariton E; Clemmer J; Clark RM; Hall T; Boruta DM; Schorge JO; Del Carmen MG
    Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jun; 125(6):1362-1370. PubMed ID: 26000507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Redefining stage I endometrial cancer: incorporating histology, a binary grading system, myometrial invasion, and lymph node assessment.
    Barlin JN; Soslow RA; Lutz M; Zhou QC; St Clair CM; Leitao MM; Iasonos A; Hensley ML; Barakat RR; Matias-Guiu X; Abu-Rustum NR
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Nov; 23(9):1620-8. PubMed ID: 24126219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detection of Colorectal Adenocarcinoma and Grading Dysplasia on Histopathologic Slides Using Deep Learning.
    Kim J; Tomita N; Suriawinata AA; Hassanpour S
    Am J Pathol; 2023 Mar; 193(3):332-340. PubMed ID: 36563748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predicting endometrial cancer subtypes and molecular features from histopathology images using multi-resolution deep learning models.
    Hong R; Liu W; DeLair D; Razavian N; Fenyö D
    Cell Rep Med; 2021 Sep; 2(9):100400. PubMed ID: 34622237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinicopathological characteristics, treatment and outcomes in uterine carcinosarcoma and grade 3 endometrial cancer patients: a comparative study.
    Zhu J; Wen H; Bi R; Wu X
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2016 Mar; 27(2):e18. PubMed ID: 26463439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Are the uterine serous carcinomas underdiagnosed? Histomorphologic and immunohistochemical correlates and clinical follow up in high-grade endometrial carcinomas initially diagnosed as high-grade endometrioid carcinoma.
    Hu S; Hinson JL; Matnani R; Cibull ML; Karabakhtsian RG
    Mod Pathol; 2018 Feb; 31(2):358-364. PubMed ID: 28984301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ultrastaging of Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Endometrial Carcinoma According to Use of 2 Different Methods.
    Euscher E; Sui D; Soliman P; Westin S; Ramalingam P; Bassett R; Malpica A
    Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2018 May; 37(3):242-251. PubMed ID: 28700425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of ultrasound strategies to assess tumor extension and to predict high-risk endometrial cancer in women from the prospective IETA (International Endometrial Tumor Analysis)-4 cohort.
    Verbakel JY; Mascilini F; Wynants L; Fischerova D; Testa AC; Franchi D; Frühauf F; Cibula D; Lindqvist PG; Fruscio R; Haak LA; Opolskiene G; Alcazar JL; Mais V; Carlson JW; Sladkevicius P; Timmerman D; Valentin L; Bosch TVD; Epstein E
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 55(1):115-124. PubMed ID: 31225683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Description of a novel system for grading of endometrial carcinoma and comparison with existing grading systems.
    Alkushi A; Abdul-Rahman ZH; Lim P; Schulzer M; Coldman A; Kalloger SE; Miller D; Gilks CB
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2005 Mar; 29(3):295-304. PubMed ID: 15725797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Deep learning-based methods for classification of microsatellite instability in endometrial cancer from HE-stained pathological images.
    Zhang Y; Chen S; Wang Y; Li J; Xu K; Chen J; Zhao J
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2023 Sep; 149(11):8877-8888. PubMed ID: 37150803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Significant variation in the assessment of cervical involvement in endometrial carcinoma: an interobserver variation study.
    McCluggage WG; Hirschowitz L; Wilson GE; Oliva E; Soslow RA; Zaino RJ
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Feb; 35(2):289-94. PubMed ID: 21263250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.