BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38880296)

  • 21. Attractiveness and distinctiveness between speakers' voices in naturalistic speech and their faces are uncorrelated.
    Zäske R; Skuk VG; Schweinberger SR
    R Soc Open Sci; 2020 Dec; 7(12):201244. PubMed ID: 33489273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Can intrinsic vowel Fo be explained by source/tract coupling?
    Ewan WG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1979 Aug; 66(2):358-62. PubMed ID: 512198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Formant movement and formant number alteration with rising FO in real vocalizations of the German vowels [u:], [o:] and [a:].
    Maurer D; Landis T; D'Heureuse C
    Int J Neurosci; 1991 Mar; 57(1-2):25-38. PubMed ID: 1938154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Resynthesis of Transmasculine Voices to Assess Gender Perception as a Function of Testosterone Therapy.
    Groll MD; Dahl KL; Cádiz MD; Welch B; Tracy LF; Stepp CE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Jul; 65(7):2474-2489. PubMed ID: 35749662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Testosterone therapy masculinizes speech and gender presentation in transgender men.
    Hodges-Simeon CR; Grail GPO; Albert G; Groll MD; Stepp CE; Carré JM; Arnocky SA
    Sci Rep; 2021 Feb; 11(1):3494. PubMed ID: 33568701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Role of Word Content, Sentence Information, and Vocoding for Voice Cue Perception.
    Koelewijn T; Gaudrain E; Shehab T; Treczoks T; Başkent D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 Sep; 66(9):3665-3676. PubMed ID: 37556819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Perceptions of human attractiveness comprising face and voice cues.
    Wells T; Baguley T; Sergeant M; Dunn A
    Arch Sex Behav; 2013 Jul; 42(5):805-11. PubMed ID: 23358855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Vocal fundamental and formant frequencies affect perceptions of speaker cooperativeness.
    Knowles KK; Little AC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(9):1657-75. PubMed ID: 26360784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Perceptual scaling of voice identity: common dimensions for different vowels and speakers.
    Baumann O; Belin P
    Psychol Res; 2010 Jan; 74(1):110-20. PubMed ID: 19034504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Vocal Age Disguise: The Role of Fundamental Frequency and Speech Rate and Its Perceived Effects.
    Skoog Waller S; Eriksson M
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1814. PubMed ID: 27917144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Beauty and Attractiveness in the Human Voice.
    Petty BE; Gillespie AI; Shelly S; Klein AM
    J Voice; 2022 Jul; 36(4):507-514. PubMed ID: 32854999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Short Implicit Voice Training Affects Listening Effort During a Voice Cue Sensitivity Task With Vocoder-Degraded Speech.
    Biçer A; Koelewijn T; Başkent D
    Ear Hear; 2023 Jul-Aug 01; 44(4):900-916. PubMed ID: 36695603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
    Van Zyl M; Hanekom JJ
    J Commun Disord; 2013; 46(5-6):449-64. PubMed ID: 24157128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Do women's voices provide cues of the likelihood of ovulation? The importance of sampling regime.
    Fischer J; Semple S; Fickenscher G; Jürgens R; Kruse E; Heistermann M; Amir O
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(9):e24490. PubMed ID: 21957453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Human voice pitch measures are robust across a variety of speech recordings: methodological and theoretical implications.
    Pisanski K; Groyecka-Bernard A; Sorokowski P
    Biol Lett; 2021 Sep; 17(9):20210356. PubMed ID: 34582736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Gender-Affirming Voice Training for Trans Women: Acoustic Outcomes and Their Associations With Listener Perceptions Related to Gender.
    Södersten M; Oates J; Sand A; Granqvist S; Quinn S; Dacakis G; Nygren U
    J Voice; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38503674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Audio-vocal responses of vocal fundamental frequency and formant during sustained vowel vocalizations in different noises.
    Lee SH; Hsiao TY; Lee GS
    Hear Res; 2015 Jun; 324():1-6. PubMed ID: 25749240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. EGG open quotient in aging voices--changes with increasing chronological age and its perception.
    Winkler R; Sendlmeier W
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2006; 31(2):51-6. PubMed ID: 16754276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Spectral noise levels and roughness severity ratings for vowels produced by male children.
    Arnold KS; Emanuel FW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1979 Sep; 22(3):613-26. PubMed ID: 502518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Gender Perception After Raising Vowel Fundamental and Formant Frequencies: Considerations for Oral Resonance Research.
    Gallena SJK; Stickels B; Stickels E
    J Voice; 2018 Sep; 32(5):592-601. PubMed ID: 28844651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.