These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38880296)

  • 41. Zebra finches and Dutch adults exhibit the same cue weighting bias in vowel perception.
    Ohms VR; Escudero P; Lammers K; ten Cate C
    Anim Cogn; 2012 Mar; 15(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 21761144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Gender Perception After Raising Vowel Fundamental and Formant Frequencies: Considerations for Oral Resonance Research.
    Gallena SJK; Stickels B; Stickels E
    J Voice; 2018 Sep; 32(5):592-601. PubMed ID: 28844651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Prelingually Deaf Children With Cochlear Implants Show Better Perception of Voice Cues and Speech in Competing Speech Than Postlingually Deaf Adults With Cochlear Implants.
    Nagels L; Gaudrain E; Vickers D; Hendriks P; Başkent D
    Ear Hear; 2024 Jul-Aug 01; 45(4):952-968. PubMed ID: 38616318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Investigating the common set of acoustic parameters in sexual orientation groups: A voice averaging approach.
    Kachel S; Radtke A; Skuk VG; Zäske R; Simpson AP; Steffens MC
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0208686. PubMed ID: 30532156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Noise and tremor in the perception of vocal aging in males.
    Harnsberger JD; Brown WS; Shrivastav R; Rothman H
    J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):523-30. PubMed ID: 19815378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Perception of pitch location within a speaker's range: fundamental frequency, voice quality and speaker sex.
    Bishop J; Keating P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1100-12. PubMed ID: 22894229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effects of speech cues in French-speaking children with dysarthria.
    Levy ES; Moya-Galé G; Chang YM; Campanelli L; MacLeod AAN; Escorial S; Maillart C
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2020 May; 55(3):401-416. PubMed ID: 32077196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. I like my voice better: self-enhancement bias in perceptions of voice attractiveness.
    Hughes SM; Harrison MA
    Perception; 2013; 42(9):941-9. PubMed ID: 24386714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Speaker race identification from acoustic cues in the vocal signal.
    Walton JH; Orlikoff RF
    J Speech Hear Res; 1994 Aug; 37(4):738-45. PubMed ID: 7967558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. On how the brain decodes vocal cues about speaker confidence.
    Jiang X; Pell MD
    Cortex; 2015 May; 66():9-34. PubMed ID: 25796072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Can listeners hear how many singers are singing? The effect of listener's experience, vibrato, onset, and formant frequency on the perception of number of simultaneous singers.
    Erickson ML; Gaskill CS
    J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):817.e1-13. PubMed ID: 22921292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Gender-Affirming Voice Training for Trans Women: Acoustic Outcomes and Their Associations With Listener Perceptions Related to Gender.
    Södersten M; Oates J; Sand A; Granqvist S; Quinn S; Dacakis G; Nygren U
    J Voice; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38503674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Spectral noise levels and roughness severity ratings for vowels produced by male children.
    Arnold KS; Emanuel FW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1979 Sep; 22(3):613-26. PubMed ID: 502518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The discrimination of voice cues in simulations of bimodal electro-acoustic cochlear-implant hearing.
    Başkent D; Luckmann A; Ceha J; Gaudrain E; Tamati TN
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Apr; 143(4):EL292. PubMed ID: 29716273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Content matters: Cyclic effects on women's voices depend on social context.
    Klatt WK; Mayer B; Lobmaier JS
    Horm Behav; 2020 Jun; 122():104762. PubMed ID: 32353446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Parameter-Specific Morphing Reveals Contributions of Timbre and Fundamental Frequency Cues to the Perception of Voice Gender and Age in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Skuk VG; Kirchen L; Oberhoffner T; Guntinas-Lichius O; Dobel C; Schweinberger SR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Sep; 63(9):3155-3175. PubMed ID: 32881631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Perception of threat and intent to harm from vocal and facial cues.
    Tompkinson J; Mileva M; Watt D; Mike Burton A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Feb; 77(2):326-342. PubMed ID: 37020335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Digit ratio (2D:4D) predicts facial, but not voice or body odour, attractiveness in men.
    Ferdenzi C; Lemaître JF; Leongómez JD; Roberts SC
    Proc Biol Sci; 2011 Dec; 278(1724):3551-7. PubMed ID: 21508034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Attractiveness and distinctiveness between speakers' voices in naturalistic speech and their faces are uncorrelated.
    Zäske R; Skuk VG; Schweinberger SR
    R Soc Open Sci; 2020 Dec; 7(12):201244. PubMed ID: 33489273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Speaking rate and fundamental frequency as speech cues to perceived age.
    Harnsberger JD; Shrivastav R; Brown WS; Rothman H; Hollien H
    J Voice; 2008 Jan; 22(1):58-69. PubMed ID: 16968663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.