These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38880958)

  • 21. Real-Time Intracochlear Electrocochleography Obtained Directly Through a Cochlear Implant.
    Harris MS; Riggs WJ; Koka K; Litvak LM; Malhotra P; Moberly AC; O'Connell BP; Holder J; Di Lella FA; Boccio CM; Wanna GB; Labadie RF; Adunka OF
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Jul; 38(6):e107-e113. PubMed ID: 28498269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Feasibility of real-time selection of frequency tables in an acoustic simulation of a cochlear implant.
    Fitzgerald MB; Sagi E; Morbiwala TA; Tan CT; Svirsky MA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):763-72. PubMed ID: 23807089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Identifying Slim Modiolar Electrode Tip Fold-Over With Intracochlear Electrocochleography.
    Varghese JJ; Walia A; Lefler SM; Ortmann AJ; Shew MA; Durakovic N; Wick CC; Herzog JA; Buchman CA
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2024 Apr; 170(4):1124-1132. PubMed ID: 38018567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Intracochlear Electrocochleography: Response Patterns During Cochlear Implantation and Hearing Preservation.
    Giardina CK; Brown KD; Adunka OF; Buchman CA; Hutson KA; Pillsbury HC; Fitzpatrick DC
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):833-848. PubMed ID: 30335669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Electro-acoustic pitch matching experiments in patients with single-sided deafness and a cochlear implant: Is there a need for adjustment of the default frequency allocation tables?
    Peters JPM; Bennink E; Grolman W; van Zanten GA
    Hear Res; 2016 Dec; 342():124-133. PubMed ID: 27789255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Intracochlear Recordings of Acoustically and Electrically Evoked Potentials in Nucleus Hybrid L24 Cochlear Implant Users and Their Relationship to Speech Perception.
    Kim JR; Tejani VD; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
    Front Neurosci; 2017; 11():216. PubMed ID: 28469553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Relationship Between Insertion Angles, Default Frequency Allocations, and Spiral Ganglion Place Pitch in Cochlear Implants.
    Landsberger DM; Svrakic M; Roland JT; Svirsky M
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):e207-13. PubMed ID: 25860624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Intracochlear Electrocochleography: Influence of Scalar Position of the Cochlear Implant Electrode on Postinsertion Results.
    Riggs WJ; Dwyer RT; Holder JT; Mattingly JK; Ortmann A; Noble JH; Dawant BM; Valenzuela CV; O'Connell BP; Harris MS; Litvak LM; Koka K; Buchman CA; Labadie RF; Adunka OF
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Jun; 40(5):e503-e510. PubMed ID: 31083085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Early Hearing Preservation Outcomes Following Cochlear Implantation With New Slim Lateral Wall Electrode Using Electrocochleography.
    Walia A; Shew MA; Ettyreddy A; Lefler SM; Jiramongkolchai P; Wick CC; Durakovic N; Buchman CA; Herzog JA
    Otol Neurotol; 2022 Apr; 43(4):443-451. PubMed ID: 35170555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Interaural Place-of-Stimulation Mismatch Estimates Using CT Scans and Binaural Perception, But Not Pitch, Are Consistent in Cochlear-Implant Users.
    Bernstein JGW; Jensen KK; Stakhovskaya OA; Noble JH; Hoa M; Kim HJ; Shih R; Kolberg E; Cleary M; Goupell MJ
    J Neurosci; 2021 Dec; 41(49):10161-10178. PubMed ID: 34725189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Simultaneous Intra- and Extracochlear Electrocochleography During Electrode Insertion.
    Dalbert A; Sijgers L; Grosse J; Veraguth D; Roosli C; Huber A; Pfiffner F
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(2):414-424. PubMed ID: 32826509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Postoperative Electrocochleography from Hybrid Cochlear Implant users: An Alternative Analysis Procedure.
    Kim JS; Tejani VD; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
    Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 370():304-315. PubMed ID: 30393003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Frequency-to-Place Mismatch Impacts Cochlear Implant Quality of Life, But Not Speech Recognition.
    Sturm JJ; Ma C; McRackan TR; Schvartz-Leyzac KC
    Laryngoscope; 2024 Jun; 134(6):2898-2905. PubMed ID: 38214299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cochlear Implant: Analysis of the Frequency-to-Place Mismatch with the Table-Based Software OTOPLAN® and Its Influence on Hearing Performance.
    Dessard L; Gersdorff G; Ivanovik N; Zoca-Assadi M; Nopp P; Camby S; Lefebvre PP
    Audiol Neurootol; 2024; 29(3):239-245. PubMed ID: 38190811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Acoustic component programming in children with cochlear implants using electrocochleography.
    Agrawal S; Coulthurst S; Nachman A; Koka K; Murray M
    Int J Audiol; 2022 Sep; 61(9):736-743. PubMed ID: 34355617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Immediate and 1-Year Outcomes with a Slim Modiolar Cochlear Implant Electrode Array.
    Durakovic N; Kallogjeri D; Wick CC; McJunkin JL; Buchman CA; Herzog J
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2020 May; 162(5):731-736. PubMed ID: 32180504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of electrode array length on frequency-place mismatch and speech perception with cochlear implants.
    Venail F; Mathiolon C; Menjot de Champfleur S; Piron JP; Sicard M; Villemus F; Vessigaud MA; Sterkers-Artieres F; Mondain M; Uziel A
    Audiol Neurootol; 2015; 20(2):102-11. PubMed ID: 25678235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Frequency-to-electrode allocation and speech perception with cochlear implants.
    McKay CM; Henshall KR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Feb; 111(2):1036-44. PubMed ID: 11863160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Round window electrocochleography and speech perception outcomes in adult cochlear implant subjects: comparison with audiometric and biographical information.
    McClellan JH; Formeister EJ; Merwin WH; Dillon MT; Calloway N; Iseli C; Buchman CA; Fitzpatrick DC; Adunka OF
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Oct; 35(9):e245-52. PubMed ID: 25118584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of Tonotopic and Default Frequency Fitting for Speech Understanding in Noise in New Cochlear Implantees: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Cross-Over Study.
    Creff G; Lambert C; Coudert P; Pean V; Laurent S; Godey B
    Ear Hear; 2024 Jan-Feb 01; 45(1):35-52. PubMed ID: 37823850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.