These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38881640)

  • 21. Effect of different preparation designs of minimally invasive occlusal onlays on the accuracy of different intraoral scanners: An in vitro study.
    Ashraf K; Ebeid K; Salah T
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38053453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of different intraoral scanners and scanbody splinting on accuracy of scanning implant-supported full arch fixed prosthesis.
    Ashraf Y; Abo El Fadl A; Hamdy A; Ebeid K
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2023 Dec; 35(8):1257-1263. PubMed ID: 37310208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of the accuracy of seven intraoral scanners for the full dentate and partially edentulous complete-arch mandibular casts: An
    Wang X; Zhang F; Ma D; Ye X; Zheng X; Ren R; Ren N; Bai S
    Heliyon; 2024 May; 10(10):e31063. PubMed ID: 38803930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Accuracy of Digital Impressions Obtained Using Six Intraoral Scanners in Partially Edentulous Dentitions and the Effect of Scanning Sequence.
    Diker B; Tak Ö
    Int J Prosthodont; 2021; 34(1):101-108. PubMed ID: 33570525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Conventional Versus Digital Complete Arch Implant Impressions.
    Albayrak B; Sukotjo C; Wee AG; Korkmaz İH; Bayındır F
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Feb; 30(2):163-170. PubMed ID: 32935894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accuracy and precision of 3 intraoral scanners and accuracy of conventional impressions: A novel in vivo analysis method.
    Nedelcu R; Olsson P; Nyström I; Rydén J; Thor A
    J Dent; 2018 Feb; 69():110-118. PubMed ID: 29246490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. In vitro evaluation of the accuracy and precision of intraoral and extraoral complete-arch scans.
    Baghani MT; Shayegh SS; Johnston WM; Shidfar S; Hakimaneh SMR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Nov; 126(5):665-670. PubMed ID: 33070974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Accuracy of Complete-Arch Scans Obtained by Intraoral Scanner and Smartphone Three-Dimensional Scanning Applications With Different Smartphone Position Setups: An In Vitro Study.
    Jiang Y; Long H; Soo SY; Mavani H; Tew IM
    Cureus; 2024 Jun; 16(6):e63471. PubMed ID: 39077296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Accuracy of Conventional and Digital Impressions for Full-Arch Implant-Supported Prostheses: An In Vitro Study.
    Drancourt N; Auduc C; Mouget A; Mouminoux J; Auroy P; Veyrune JL; El Osta N; Nicolas E
    J Pers Med; 2023 May; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 37241002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Accuracy of six intraoral scanners for scanning complete-arch and 4-unit fixed partial dentures: An in vitro study.
    Diker B; Tak Ö
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Aug; 128(2):187-194. PubMed ID: 33558056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of Accuracy Between a Conventional and Two Digital Intraoral Impression Techniques.
    Malik J; Rodriguez J; Weisbloom M; Petridis H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2018; 31(2):107-113. PubMed ID: 29518805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Local accuracy of actual intraoral scanning systems for single-tooth preparations in vitro.
    Zimmermann M; Ender A; Mehl A
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2020 Feb; 151(2):127-135. PubMed ID: 31883705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Accuracy of complete-arch model using an intraoral video scanner: An in vitro study.
    Jeong ID; Lee JJ; Jeon JH; Kim JH; Kim HY; Kim WC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Jun; 115(6):755-9. PubMed ID: 26794703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accuracy of 3D Printed and Digital Casts Produced from Intraoral and Extraoral Scanners with Different Scanning Technologies: In Vitro Study.
    Ellakany P; Aly NM; Al-Harbi F
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Jul; 31(6):521-528. PubMed ID: 34661950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of the effect of different core substrates on the accuracy of intraoral scanners.
    Khoshkhahesh M; Enteghad S; Aghasadeghi K; Farzin M; Taghva M; Mosadad SA
    Clin Exp Dent Res; 2024 Jun; 10(3):e899. PubMed ID: 38752461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accuracy of impression-making methods in edentulous arches: An in vitro study encompassing conventional and digital methods.
    Li J; Moon HS; Kim JH; Yoon HI; Oh KC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):479-486. PubMed ID: 33583617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Accuracy of complete-arch intraoral scans based on confocal microscopy versus optical triangulation: A comparative in vitro study.
    Waldecker M; Rues S; Rammelsberg P; Bömicke W
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Sep; 126(3):414-420. PubMed ID: 32950254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of trueness and precision of two intraoral scanners and a conventional impression: an in vivo clinical study.
    Jorquera GJ; Sampaio CS; Bozzalla A; Hirata R; Sánchez JP
    Quintessence Int; 2021 Oct; 52(10):904-910. PubMed ID: 34410071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Computerized Casts for Orthodontic Purpose Using Powder-Free Intraoral Scanners: Accuracy, Execution Time, and Patient Feedback.
    Sfondrini MF; Gandini P; Malfatto M; Di Corato F; Trovati F; Scribante A
    Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():4103232. PubMed ID: 29850512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of digital intraoral scanners and alginate impressions: Time and patient satisfaction.
    Burzynski JA; Firestone AR; Beck FM; Fields HW; Deguchi T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr; 153(4):534-541. PubMed ID: 29602345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.