These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38881640)

  • 41. [Scan time and accuracy of full-arch scans with intraoral scanners: a comparative study on conditions of the intraoral head-simulator and the hand-held model].
    Wu MT; Tang SX; Peng LY; Han YT; Su YC; Wang X
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Jun; 56(6):570-575. PubMed ID: 34098673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. In vitro comparison of five desktop scanners and an industrial scanner in the evaluation of an intraoral scanner accuracy.
    Borbola D; Berkei G; Simon B; Romanszky L; Sersli G; DeFee M; Renne W; Mangano F; Vag J
    J Dent; 2023 Feb; 129():104391. PubMed ID: 36549570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Influence of Scanning-Aid Materials on the Accuracy and Time Efficiency of Intraoral Scanners for Full-Arch Digital Scanning: An In Vitro Study.
    Oh HS; Lim YJ; Kim B; Kim MJ; Kwon HB; Baek YW
    Materials (Basel); 2021 Apr; 14(9):. PubMed ID: 33946471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Effect of different span lengths with different total occlusal convergences on the accuracy of intraoral scanners.
    Yehia A; Abo El Fadl A; El Sergany O; Ebeid K
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Mar; 33(3):252-258. PubMed ID: 36988154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A new method for assessing the accuracy of full arch impressions in patients.
    Kuhr F; Schmidt A; Rehmann P; Wöstmann B
    J Dent; 2016 Dec; 55():68-74. PubMed ID: 27717754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The transfer accuracy of digital and conventional full-arch impressions influenced by fixed orthodontic appliances: a reference aid-based in vitro study.
    Schlenz MA; Klaus K; Schmidt A; Wöstmann B; Mersmann M; Ruf S; Bock NC
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jan; 27(1):273-283. PubMed ID: 36109373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Accuracy of full-arch digital impressions: an in vitro and in vivo comparison.
    Keul C; Güth JF
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Feb; 24(2):735-745. PubMed ID: 31134345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Accuracy of digital impressions of multiple dental implants: an in vitro study.
    Vandeweghe S; Vervack V; Dierens M; De Bruyn H
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Jun; 28(6):648-653. PubMed ID: 27150731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Influence of different material substrates on the accuracy of 3 intraoral scanners: A single-blinded in vitro study.
    Michelinakis G; Apostolakis D; Tsagarakis A; Lampropoulos P
    Int J Prosthodont; 2022; 35(1):82–93. PubMed ID: 33751003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effect of different intraoral scanners and post-space depths on the trueness of digital impressions.
    Emam M; Ghanem L; Abdel Sadek HM
    Dent Med Probl; 2024; 61(4):577-584. PubMed ID: 37070711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The impact of mandibular partial edentulous distal extension on virtual occlusal record accuracy when using two different intraoral scanners: An in vitro analysis.
    Tian J; Jung RE; Han Y; Mei Y; Di P
    J Dent; 2024 Nov; 150():105303. PubMed ID: 39134116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Trueness of full-arch dental models obtained by digital and conventional impression techniques: an in vivo study.
    Onbasi Y; Abu-Hossin S; Paulig M; Berger L; Wichmann M; Matta RE
    Sci Rep; 2022 Dec; 12(1):22509. PubMed ID: 36581668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Effect of Scan Pattern on the Accuracy of Complete-Arch Digital Implant Impressions with Two Intraoral Scanners.
    Li Z; Huang R; Wu X; Chen Z; Huang B; Chen Z
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(4):731-739. PubMed ID: 35904829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Evaluation of the accuracy of digital and 3D-printed casts compared with conventional stone casts.
    Ellakany P; Al-Harbi F; El Tantawi M; Mohsen C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Mar; 127(3):438-444. PubMed ID: 33308856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Error propagation from intraoral scanning to additive manufacturing of complete-arch dentate models: An in vitro study.
    Auškalnis L; Akulauskas M; Jegelevičius D; Simonaitis T; Rutkūnas V
    J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104136. PubMed ID: 35460866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparison of Accuracy of Current Ten Intraoral Scanners.
    Amornvit P; Rokaya D; Sanohkan S
    Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():2673040. PubMed ID: 34552983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Complete-arch accuracy of intraoral scanners.
    Treesh JC; Liacouras PC; Taft RM; Brooks DI; Raiciulescu S; Ellert DO; Grant GT; Ye L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):382-388. PubMed ID: 29724554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A novel in vivo method to evaluate trueness of digital impressions.
    Albdour EA; Shaheen E; Vranckx M; Mangano FG; Politis C; Jacobs R
    BMC Oral Health; 2018 Jul; 18(1):117. PubMed ID: 29970056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Influence of repeated cut-off and rescanning on the trueness of the intraoral digital scans.
    Guo J; Lu Y; Li R; Zhou K; Ge R; Zhao D; Xia S; Wang Y
    J Dent; 2024 Nov; 150():105153. PubMed ID: 38914183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Accuracy of a chairside intraoral scanner compared with a laboratory scanner for the completely edentulous maxilla: An in vitro 3-dimensional comparative analysis.
    Zarone F; Ruggiero G; Ferrari M; Mangano F; Joda T; Sorrentino R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):761.e1-761.e7. PubMed ID: 33289647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.