116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38883194)
1. Cost-effectiveness analysis of bevacizumab combined with lomustine in the treatment of progressive glioblastoma using a Markov model simulation analysis.
Chen Z; Tian F; Zhang Y
Front Public Health; 2024; 12():1410355. PubMed ID: 38883194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Treatment options for progression or recurrence of glioblastoma: a network meta-analysis.
McBain C; Lawrie TA; Rogozińska E; Kernohan A; Robinson T; Jefferies S
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 May; 5(1):CD013579. PubMed ID: 34559423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Toxicity and efficacy of lomustine and bevacizumab in recurrent glioblastoma patients.
Jakobsen JN; Urup T; Grunnet K; Toft A; Johansen MD; Poulsen SH; Christensen IJ; Muhic A; Poulsen HS
J Neurooncol; 2018 Apr; 137(2):439-446. PubMed ID: 29330749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness analysis of additional bevacizumab to pemetrexed plus cisplatin for malignant pleural mesothelioma based on the MAPS trial.
Zhan M; Zheng H; Xu T; Yang Y; Li Q
Lung Cancer; 2017 Aug; 110():1-6. PubMed ID: 28676211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effectiveness of Maintenance Capecitabine and Bevacizumab for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Sherman SK; Lange JJ; Dahdaleh FS; Rajeev R; Gamblin TC; Polite BN; Turaga KK
JAMA Oncol; 2019 Feb; 5(2):236-242. PubMed ID: 30489611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Economic Evaluation of Bevacizumab for the First-Line Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Multiforme.
Kovic B; Xie F
J Clin Oncol; 2015 Jul; 33(20):2296-302. PubMed ID: 26014296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Progression-free and overall survival in patients with recurrent Glioblastoma multiforme treated with last-line bevacizumab versus bevacizumab/lomustine.
Heiland DH; Masalha W; Franco P; Machein MR; Weyerbrock A
J Neurooncol; 2016 Feb; 126(3):567-75. PubMed ID: 26614518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness analysis of the addition of bevacizumab to temozolomide therapy for the treatment of unresected glioblastoma.
Chen Z; Zhan M; Tian F; Xu T
Oncol Lett; 2020 Jan; 19(1):424-430. PubMed ID: 31897155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness analysis of capecitabine plus bevacizumab versus capecitabine alone in elderly patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer from Chinese societal perspective.
Zhang PF; Wen F; Zhou J; Huang JX; Zhou KX; Wu QJ; Wang XY; Zhang MX; Liao WT; Li Q
Clin Transl Oncol; 2020 Jan; 22(1):103-110. PubMed ID: 31062173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Three-Drug Regimen Containing Bevacizumab for the Treatment of Recurrent Pediatric
Chen Z; Tian F; Chen X
Front Public Health; 2022; 10():914536. PubMed ID: 35719637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Atezolizumab and bevacizumab combination compared with sorafenib as the first-line systemic treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A cost-effectiveness analysis in China and the United states.
Wen F; Zheng H; Zhang P; Liao W; Zhou K; Li Q
Liver Int; 2021 May; 41(5):1097-1104. PubMed ID: 33556230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab vs Sorafenib for Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Zhang X; Wang J; Shi J; Jia X; Dang S; Wang W
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Apr; 4(4):e214846. PubMed ID: 33825837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Everolimus plus exemestane versus bevacizumab-based chemotherapy for second-line treatment of hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer in Greece: An economic evaluation study.
Kourlaba G; Rapti V; Alexopoulos A; Relakis J; Koumakis G; Chatzikou M; Maniadakis N; Georgoulias V
BMC Health Serv Res; 2015 Aug; 15():307. PubMed ID: 26239115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bevacizumab Continuation Versus Treatment Holidays After First-Line Chemotherapy With Bevacizumab in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Health Economic Analysis of a Randomized Phase 3 Trial (SAKK 41/06).
Matter-Walstra K; Schwenkglenks M; Betticher D; von Moos R; Dietrich D; Baertschi D; Koeberle D
Clin Colorectal Cancer; 2016 Dec; 15(4):314-320.e2. PubMed ID: 27117056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lomustine and Bevacizumab in Progressive Glioblastoma.
Wick W; Gorlia T; Bendszus M; Taphoorn M; Sahm F; Harting I; Brandes AA; Taal W; Domont J; Idbaih A; Campone M; Clement PM; Stupp R; Fabbro M; Le Rhun E; Dubois F; Weller M; von Deimling A; Golfinopoulos V; Bromberg JC; Platten M; Klein M; van den Bent MJ
N Engl J Med; 2017 Nov; 377(20):1954-1963. PubMed ID: 29141164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. First-line atezolizumab in addition to bevacizumab plus chemotherapy for metastatic, nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer: A United States-based cost-effectiveness analysis.
Wan X; Luo X; Tan C; Zeng X; Zhang Y; Peng L
Cancer; 2019 Oct; 125(20):3526-3534. PubMed ID: 31287562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Garside R; Pitt M; Anderson R; Rogers G; Dyer M; Mealing S; Somerville M; Price A; Stein K
Health Technol Assess; 2007 Nov; 11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. PubMed ID: 17999840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab vs Sorafenib as First-Line Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Su D; Wu B; Shi L
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Feb; 4(2):e210037. PubMed ID: 33625508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line treatments for advanced epidermal growth factor receptor-mutant non-small cell lung cancer patients.
Li WQ; Li LY; Chai J; Cui JW
Cancer Med; 2021 Mar; 10(6):1964-1974. PubMed ID: 33626238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Noninvasive Characterization of Tumor Angiogenesis and Oxygenation in Bevacizumab-treated Recurrent Glioblastoma by Using Dynamic Susceptibility MRI: Secondary Analysis of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 26101 Trial.
Kickingereder P; Brugnara G; Hansen MB; Nowosielski M; Pflüger I; Schell M; Isensee F; Foltyn M; Neuberger U; Kessler T; Sahm F; Wick A; Heiland S; Weller M; Platten M; von Deimling A; Maier-Hein KH; Østergaard L; van den Bent MJ; Gorlia T; Wick W; Bendszus M
Radiology; 2020 Oct; 297(1):164-175. PubMed ID: 32720870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
