116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38885280)
1. Mendelian segregation and high recombination rates facilitate genetic analyses in Cryptosporidium parvum.
Kimball A; Funkhouser-Jones L; Huang W; Xu R; Witola WH; Sibley LD
PLoS Genet; 2024 Jun; 20(6):e1011162. PubMed ID: 38885280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mendelian segregation and high recombination rates facilitate genetic analyses in
Kimball A; Funkhouser-Jones L; Huang W; Xu R; Witola WH; Sibley LD
bioRxiv; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38352509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genetic crosses in the apicomplexan parasite Cryptosporidium parvum define recombination parameters.
Tanriverdi S; Blain JC; Deng B; Ferdig MT; Widmer G
Mol Microbiol; 2007 Mar; 63(5):1432-9. PubMed ID: 17302818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Genetic Ablation of a Female-Specific Apetala 2 Transcription Factor Blocks Oocyst Shedding in Cryptosporidium parvum.
Tandel J; Walzer KA; Byerly JH; Pinkston B; Beiting DP; Striepen B
mBio; 2023 Apr; 14(2):e0326122. PubMed ID: 36786597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Life cycle progression and sexual development of the apicomplexan parasite Cryptosporidium parvum.
Tandel J; English ED; Sateriale A; Gullicksrud JA; Beiting DP; Sullivan MC; Pinkston B; Striepen B
Nat Microbiol; 2019 Dec; 4(12):2226-2236. PubMed ID: 31477896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Experimental evidence for genetic recombination in the opportunistic pathogen Cryptosporidium parvum.
Feng X; Rich SM; Tzipori S; Widmer G
Mol Biochem Parasitol; 2002 Jan; 119(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 11755186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transcriptome analysis of pig intestinal cell monolayers infected with Cryptosporidium parvum asexual stages.
Mirhashemi ME; Noubary F; Chapman-Bonofiglio S; Tzipori S; Huggins GS; Widmer G
Parasit Vectors; 2018 Mar; 11(1):176. PubMed ID: 29530089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Characterization of CpCaM, a protein potentially involved in the growth of Cryptosporidium parvum.
Lai P; Yang X; Li YH; Yin YL; Yao Q; Huang S; Fan YY; Song JK; Zhao GH
Parasitol Res; 2023 Apr; 122(4):989-996. PubMed ID: 36879147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Stem-Cell-Derived Platform Enables Complete Cryptosporidium Development In Vitro and Genetic Tractability.
Wilke G; Funkhouser-Jones LJ; Wang Y; Ravindran S; Wang Q; Beatty WL; Baldridge MT; VanDussen KL; Shen B; Kuhlenschmidt MS; Kuhlenschmidt TB; Witola WH; Stappenbeck TS; Sibley LD
Cell Host Microbe; 2019 Jul; 26(1):123-134.e8. PubMed ID: 31231046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Insulinase-like Protease 1 Contributes to Macrogamont Formation in Cryptosporidium parvum.
Xu R; Feng Y; Xiao L; Sibley LD
mBio; 2021 Mar; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 33688009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Characterisation of a Cryptosporidium parvum-specific cDNA clone and detection of parasite DNA in mucosal scrapings of infected mice.
Petry F; Shirley MW; Miles MA; McDonald V
Mol Biochem Parasitol; 1998 Sep; 95(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 9763286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Highly Active AntiRetroviral Therapy and cryptosporidiosis].
Morales Gomez MA
Parassitologia; 2004 Jun; 46(1-2):95-9. PubMed ID: 15305695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ultrastructural changes in Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts by gamma irradiation.
Joung M; Yun S; Joung M; Park WY; Yu JR
Korean J Parasitol; 2011 Mar; 49(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 21461265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mouse Models for Use in Cryptosporidium Infection Studies and Quantification of Parasite Burden Using Flow Cytometry, qPCR, and Histopathology.
Sonzogni-Desautels K; Mead JR; Ndao M
Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2052():229-251. PubMed ID: 31452166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Identification of host protein ENO1 (alpha-enolase) interacting with Cryptosporidium parvum sporozoite surface protein, Cpgp40.
Wang Y; Li N; Liang G; Wang L; Zhang X; Cui Z; Li X; Zhang S; Zhang L
Parasit Vectors; 2024 Mar; 17(1):146. PubMed ID: 38504274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of differences between DNA content of cell-cultured and freely suspended oocysts of Cryptosporidium parvum and their suitability as DNA standards in qPCR.
Woolsey ID; Blomstrand B; Øines Ø; Enemark HL
Parasit Vectors; 2019 Dec; 12(1):596. PubMed ID: 31856894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Protective efficacy of recombinant Cryptosporidium parvum CpPRP1 sushi domain against C. tyzzeri infection in mice.
Huang Y; Cao W; Shi K; Mi R; Lu K; Han X; Chen Z
Parasite Immunol; 2017 Sep; 39(9):. PubMed ID: 28599077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative genomic analysis reveals occurrence of genetic recombination in virulent Cryptosporidium hominis subtypes and telomeric gene duplications in Cryptosporidium parvum.
Guo Y; Tang K; Rowe LA; Li N; Roellig DM; Knipe K; Frace M; Yang C; Feng Y; Xiao L
BMC Genomics; 2015 Apr; 16(1):320. PubMed ID: 25903370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The transcriptome of Cryptosporidium oocysts and intracellular stages.
Matos LVS; McEvoy J; Tzipori S; Bresciani KDS; Widmer G
Sci Rep; 2019 May; 9(1):7856. PubMed ID: 31133645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. First Report of Cryptosporidium molnari-Like Genotype and Cryptosporidium parvum Zoonotic Subtypes (IIaA15G2R1 and IIaA18G3R1) in Brown Trout ( Salmo trutta).
Couso-Pérez S; Ares-Mazás E; Gómez-Couso H
J Parasitol; 2019 Feb; 105(1):170-179. PubMed ID: 30807710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
