These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38886013)

  • 21. Single-Level Anterolateral and Posterior Interbody Fusion Techniques are Associated with Equivalent Long-Term Lumbar Reoperations.
    Narendran N; Nilssen PK; Skaggs DL; Kim SD; Perry TG; Mikhail CM; Tuchman A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38093607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Indirect Decompression Using Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Restenosis after an Initial Decompression Surgery.
    Nakashima H; Kanemura T; Satake K; Ito K; Ishikawa Y; Ouchida J; Segi N; Yamaguchi H; Imagama S
    Asian Spine J; 2020 Jun; 14(3):305-311. PubMed ID: 31906613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Biomechanical evaluation of interbody fixation with secondary augmentation: lateral lumbar interbody fusion versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Godzik J; Kalb S; Reis MT; Reyes PM; Singh V; Newcomb AGUS; Chang SW; Kelly BP; Crawford NR
    J Spine Surg; 2018 Jun; 4(2):180-186. PubMed ID: 30069505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A meta-analysis comparing ALIF, PLIF, TLIF and LLIF.
    Teng I; Han J; Phan K; Mobbs R
    J Clin Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 44():11-17. PubMed ID: 28676316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Expandable Technology Improves Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Disc Disease.
    Li YM; Huang Z; Towner J; Li YI; Riggleman JR; Ledonio C
    Int J Spine Surg; 2021 Feb; 15(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 33900961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Does approach matter? A comparative radiographic analysis of spinopelvic parameters in single-level lumbar fusion.
    Ahlquist S; Park HY; Gatto J; Shamie AN; Park DY
    Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):1999-2008. PubMed ID: 29631061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparing stand-alone oblique lumbar interbody fusion with posterior lumbar interbody fusion for revision of rostral adjacent segment disease: A STROBE-compliant study.
    Zhu G; Hao Y; Yu L; Cai Y; Yang X
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Oct; 97(40):e12680. PubMed ID: 30290656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Longitudinal Trends of Patient Demographics and Morbidity of Different Approaches in Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Analysis Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
    Oezel L; Okano I; Hughes AP; Sarin M; Shue J; Sama AA; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Soffin EM
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Aug; 164():e183-e193. PubMed ID: 35472646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Time Course Observation of Outcomes between Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Lin GX; Park CK; Hur JW; Kim JS
    Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo); 2019 Jun; 59(6):222-230. PubMed ID: 31068542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A Comparison of Hidden Blood Loss Between Multilevel Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients.
    Kinoshita H; Abe E; Kobayashi T; Hongo M; Kasukawa Y; Kikuchi K; Kudo D; Kimura R; Miyakoshi N
    Global Spine J; 2023 Dec; ():21925682231224389. PubMed ID: 38129119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A Cost-Effectiveness Comparison Between Open Transforaminal and Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusions Using the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio at 2-Year Follow-up.
    Gandhoke GS; Shin HM; Chang YF; Tempel Z; Gerszten PC; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS
    Neurosurgery; 2016 Apr; 78(4):585-95. PubMed ID: 26726969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI-TLIF): A Video Technique Guide.
    Saela S; Pompliano M; Varghese J; Sinha K; Faloon M; Emami A
    JBJS Essent Surg Tech; 2023; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 38380431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of Stand-alone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Open Laminectomy and Posterolateral Instrumented Fusion in the Treatment of Adjacent Segment Disease Following Previous Lumbar Fusion Surgery.
    Louie PK; Haws BE; Khan JM; Markowitz J; Movassaghi K; Ferguson J; Lopez GD; An HS; Phillips FM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Dec; 44(24):E1461-E1469. PubMed ID: 31415471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of Prone Transpsoas and Standard Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disease: A Retrospective Radiographic Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
    Soliman MAR; Khan A; Pollina J
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Jan; 157():e11-e21. PubMed ID: 34464774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Indirect decompression via oblique lateral interbody fusion for severe degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a comparative study with direct decompression transforaminal/posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Shimizu T; Fujibayashi S; Otsuki B; Murata K; Matsuda S
    Spine J; 2021 Jun; 21(6):963-971. PubMed ID: 33540124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Graft subsidence as a predictor of revision surgery following stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion.
    Tempel ZJ; McDowell MM; Panczykowski DM; Gandhoke GS; Hamilton DK; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Jan; 28(1):50-56. PubMed ID: 29125429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Impact of Surgical Approach on Sagittal Plane Alignment in Patients Undergoing One- or Two- Level Fusions for Degenerative Pathology: A Multicenter Radiographic Evaluation 6 Months Following Surgery.
    Leveque JA; Drolet CE; Nemani V; Krause KL; Shen J; Rathore A; Baig Y; Louie PK
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Aug; 164():e311-e317. PubMed ID: 35490888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Are there differences in the reoperation rates for operative adjacent-segment disease between ALIF+PS, PLIF+PS, TLIF+PS, and LLIF+PS? An analysis of a cohort of 5291 patients.
    Bains RR; Royse KE; Fennessy J; Norheim EP; Tabaraee E; Harris JE; Kuo CC; Guppy KH
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2024 Jun; 40(6):733-740. PubMed ID: 38457789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Robotic-Assisted Single-Position Prone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes.
    Shafi K; Lovecchio F; Song J; Qureshi S
    JBJS Essent Surg Tech; 2023; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 38357472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with stenosis.
    Cheng X; Zhang K; Sun X; Zhao C; Li H; Ni B; Zhao J
    Spine J; 2017 Aug; 17(8):1127-1133. PubMed ID: 28416439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.