These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38886301)

  • 1. On the relationship between spatial attention and semantics in the context of a Stroop paradigm.
    Besner D; Young T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38886301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automaticity revisited: when print doesn't activate semantics.
    Labuschagne EM; Besner D
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():117. PubMed ID: 25713553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Semantic information mediates visual attention during spoken word recognition in Chinese: Evidence from the printed-word version of the visual-world paradigm.
    Shen W; Qu Q; Li X
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jul; 78(5):1267-84. PubMed ID: 26993126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. I see/hear what you mean: semantic activation in visual word recognition depends on perceptual attention.
    Connell L; Lynott D
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Apr; 143(2):527-33. PubMed ID: 24099578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The myth of ballistic processing: evidence from Stroop's paradigm.
    Besner D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Jun; 8(2):324-30. PubMed ID: 11495121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Event-related potentials and oscillatory brain responses associated with semantic and Stroop-like interference effects in overt naming.
    Piai V; Roelofs A; van der Meij R
    Brain Res; 2012 Apr; 1450():87-101. PubMed ID: 22424790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attention constraints of semantic activation during visual word recognition.
    Smith MC; Bentin S; Spalek TM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Sep; 27(5):1289-98. PubMed ID: 11550755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attentional constraints on semantic activation: Evidence from Stroop's paradigm.
    White D; Besner D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Sep; 189():4-11. PubMed ID: 27594342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prepotent task-irrelevant semantic information is dampened by domain-specific control mechanisms during visual word recognition.
    Sulpizio S; Job R; Leoni P; Scaltritti M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Mar; 75(3):390-405. PubMed ID: 34165355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automaticity in reading and the Stroop task: testing the limits of involuntary word processing.
    Brown TL; Joneleit K; Robinson CS; Brown CR
    Am J Psychol; 2002; 115(4):515-43. PubMed ID: 12516527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automatic processes in lexical access and spreading activation.
    Friedrich FJ; Henik A; Tzelgov J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Aug; 17(3):792-806. PubMed ID: 1834791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Basic processes in reading: is visual word recognition obligatory?
    Risko EF; Stolz JA; Besner D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Feb; 12(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 15945205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modulating semantic feedback in visual word recognition.
    Smith MC; Besner D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Mar; 8(1):111-7. PubMed ID: 11340855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Components of Stroop-like interference in word reading.
    La Heij W; Happel B; Mulder M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1990 Mar; 73(2):115-29. PubMed ID: 2343768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Coloring only a single letter does not eliminate color-word interference in a vocal-response Stroop task: automaticity revealed.
    Marmurek HH
    J Gen Psychol; 2003 Apr; 130(2):207-24. PubMed ID: 12773021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Social priming of dyslexia and reduction of the Stroop effect: what component of the Stroop effect is actually reduced?
    Augustinova M; Ferrand L
    Cognition; 2014 Mar; 130(3):442-54. PubMed ID: 24387881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Context dependency in Stroop's paradigm: when are words treated as nonlinguistic objects?
    Besner D; Stolz J
    Can J Exp Psychol; 1999 Dec; 53(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 10646208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interactive activation in visual word recognition: constraints imposed by the joint effects of spatial attention and semantics.
    Stolz JA; Stevanovski B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Dec; 30(6):1064-76. PubMed ID: 15584815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Context effects in stroop-like word and picture processing.
    Glaser WR; Glaser MO
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1989 Mar; 118(1):13-42. PubMed ID: 2522504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A horse race of a different color: Stroop interference patterns with transformed words.
    Dunbar K; MacLeod CM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Oct; 10(5):622-39. PubMed ID: 6238123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.