These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38886301)

  • 21. Spatial attention modulates feature crosstalk in visual word processing.
    Risko EF; Stolz JA; Besner D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):989-98. PubMed ID: 20436195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Disentangling Genuine Semantic Stroop Effects in Reading from Contingency Effects: On the Need for Two Neutral Baselines.
    Lorentz E; McKibben T; Ekstrand C; Gould L; Anton K; Borowsky R
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():386. PubMed ID: 27014177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The time course of the lowercase advantage in visual word recognition: An ERP investigation.
    Vergara-Martínez M; Perea M; Leone-Fernandez B
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Sep; 146():107556. PubMed ID: 32682796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. When are morphemic and semantic priming observed in visual word recognition?
    Macnevin C; Besner D
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2002 Jun; 56(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 12066419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Visual word recognition: Evidence for a serial bottleneck in lexical access.
    White AL; Palmer J; Boynton GM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):2000-2017. PubMed ID: 31832892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. On the categorical nature of the semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm.
    Costa A; Alario FX; Caramazza A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Feb; 12(1):125-31. PubMed ID: 15948287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Different types of semantic interference, same lapses of attention: Evidence from Stroop tasks.
    Scaltritti M; Job R; Sulpizio S
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Jul; 50(5):898-910. PubMed ID: 35040025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. My word! Interference from reading object names implies a role for competition during picture name retrieval.
    Vitkovitch M; Cooper E
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(6):1229-40. PubMed ID: 22390174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. ERP analyses of task effects on semantic processing from words.
    Marí-Beffa P; Valdés B; Cullen DJ; Catena A; Houghton G
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 May; 23(2-3):293-305. PubMed ID: 15820637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Resolving semantic interference during word production requires central attention.
    Kleinman D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Nov; 39(6):1860-77. PubMed ID: 23773184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. What kind of attention modulates the Stroop effect?
    Besner D; Stolz JA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 1999 Mar; 6(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 12199318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. On the interaction between linguistic and pictorial systems in the absence of semantic mediation: evidence from a priming paradigm.
    Smith MC; Meiran N; Besner D
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Mar; 28(2):204-13. PubMed ID: 10790976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Unconsciously controlled processing: the Stroop effect reconsidered.
    Besner D; Stolz JA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 1999 Sep; 6(3):449-55. PubMed ID: 12198783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Word-based grouping affects the prime-task effect on semantic priming.
    Marí-Beffa P; Houghton G; Estévez AF; Fuentes LJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Apr; 26(2):469-79. PubMed ID: 10811157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Specific word transfer as a measure of processing in the word-superiority paradigm.
    Hayman CA; Jacoby LL
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Mar; 17(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 2927310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Incidental memory for colour word associates processed in colour naming and reading aloud tasks: is a blue
    Cortese MJ; Khanna MM; Von Nordheim D
    Memory; 2019 Aug; 27(7):924-930. PubMed ID: 31021306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Predictive pre-activation of orthographic and lexical-semantic representations facilitates visual word recognition.
    Eisenhauer S; Gagl B; Fiebach CJ
    Psychophysiology; 2022 Mar; 59(3):e13970. PubMed ID: 34813664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Visual word recognition: reattending to the role of spatial attention.
    Stolz JA; McCann RS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2000 Aug; 26(4):1320-31. PubMed ID: 10946717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Word processing in the parafoveal region.
    Lee CH; Kim K
    Int J Psychol; 2009 Oct; 44(5):369-77. PubMed ID: 22029615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The locus and nature of semantic congruity in symbolic comparison: evidence from the Stroop effect.
    Shaki S; Algom D
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Jan; 30(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 11958352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.