These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Effects of resistance form on attachment strength of resin-retained castings. Wilkes PW; Shillingburg HT; Johnson DL J Okla Dent Assoc; 2000; 90(3):16-20, 22, 24-5. PubMed ID: 11314309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Loss of sound tooth structure when replacing amalgam restorations by adhesive inlays. Moscovich H; Creugers NH; De Kanter RJ; Roeters FJ Oper Dent; 1998; 23(6):327-31. PubMed ID: 9855856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Experimental studies of the proper indication of inlay and crown therapy in lateral tooth areas]. Binus W; Pütz A; Taege F Stomatol DDR; 1990 Apr; 40(4):145-6. PubMed ID: 2270559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of core material and restoration design on strength of endodontically treated bovine teeth: a laboratory study. Hinckfuss S; Wilson PR J Prosthodont; 2008 Aug; 17(6):456-61. PubMed ID: 18544133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A pin amalgam or composite core foundation technique for teeth with minimal coronal structure. Mamoun JS; Cervini E J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Jun; 91(6):599-602. PubMed ID: 15211306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Extension for prevention: is it relevant today? Osborne JW; Summitt JB Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):189-96. PubMed ID: 10388375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Restoration of endodontically treated teeth]. Del Bel Cury AA; da Costa WF Rev Faculdade Odontol Lins; 1990; 3(2):22-7. PubMed ID: 2129566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Preservation-based approaches to restore posterior teeth with amalgam, resin or a combination of materials. Baghdadi ZD Am J Dent; 2002 Feb; 15(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 12074231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Influence of remaining coronal tooth structure location on the fracture resistance of restored endodontically treated anterior teeth. Ng CC; Dumbrigue HB; Al-Bayat MI; Griggs JA; Wakefield CW J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Apr; 95(4):290-6. PubMed ID: 16616126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Fracture resistance of maxillary premolars restored with direct and indirect adhesive techniques. Santos MJ; Bezerra RB J Can Dent Assoc; 2005 Sep; 71(8):585. PubMed ID: 16202199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: fracture resistance and fracture mode. Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Martins LR; Soares CJ J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 18182183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Direct cores for vital teeth--materials and methods used to retain cores in vital teeth. Wilson PH; Fisher NL; Bartlett DW Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2002 Dec; 10(4):157-62. PubMed ID: 12526272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Fracture resistance of teeth directly and indirectly restored with composite resin and indirectly restored with ceramic materials. Dalpino PH; Francischone CE; Ishikiriama A; Franco EB Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):389-94. PubMed ID: 12691276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The influence of a packable resin composite, conventional resin composite and amalgam on molar cuspal stiffness. Molinaro JD; Diefenderfer KE; Strother JM Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):516-24. PubMed ID: 12216572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Pin-retained amalgam. Dawson PE Dent Clin North Am; 1970 Jan; 14(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 5262044 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. How enamel preparations aid in retention of etched resin restorations as compared to pin retain resins. Ayers AJ Ariz Dent J; 1976; 22(3):39-41. PubMed ID: 786221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The composite resin-amalgam window preparation. Nelson JA Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1992 Aug; 4(6):21-6. PubMed ID: 1391930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]