BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38887001)

  • 1. Incidence of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula in patients undergoing open and minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy: a population-based study.
    Chang JH; Kakati RT; Wehrle C; Naples R; Joyce D; Augustin T; Simon R; Walsh RM; Dahdaleh FS; Spanheimer P; Salti I; Parente A; Naffouje SA
    J Minim Invasive Surg; 2024 Jun; 27(2):95-108. PubMed ID: 38887001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Robotic vs Open Pancreatoduodenectomy on Incidence of Pancreatic Fistula.
    McMillan MT; Zureikat AH; Hogg ME; Kowalsky SJ; Zeh HJ; Sprys MH; Vollmer CM
    JAMA Surg; 2017 Apr; 152(4):327-335. PubMed ID: 28030724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Wrapping double-mattress anastomosis for pancreaticojejunostomy in minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy can significantly reduce postoperative pancreatic fistula rate compared with conventional pancreaticojejunostomy in open surgery: An analysis of a propensity score-matched sample.
    Kiguchi G; Sugioka A; Uchida Y; Yoshikawa J; Nakauchi M; Kojima M; Tanahashi Y; Takahara T; Yasuda A; Suda K; Kato Y; Uyama I
    Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 38():101577. PubMed ID: 33887674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perioperative and oncologic outcome of robot-assisted minimally invasive (hybrid laparoscopic and robotic) pancreatoduodenectomy: based on pancreatic fistula risk score and cancer/staging matched comparison with open pancreatoduodenectomy.
    Kim HS; Kim H; Kwon W; Han Y; Byun Y; Kang JS; Choi YJ; Jang JY
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Apr; 35(4):1675-1681. PubMed ID: 32277354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Is Associated with Decreased Clinically Relevant Pancreatic Fistulas: a Propensity-Matched Analysis.
    Cai J; Ramanathan R; Zenati MS; Al Abbas A; Hogg ME; Zeh HJ; Zureikat AH
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2020 May; 24(5):1111-1118. PubMed ID: 31267434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of Operative Time on Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy.
    Williams MD; Bhama AR; Naffouje S; Kamarajah SK; Becerra AZ; Zhang Y; Pappas SG; Dahdaleh FS
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2023 Jan; 27(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 36357742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robotic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis based on factors predictive of postoperative pancreatic fistula.
    Napoli N; Kauffmann EF; Menonna F; Costa F; Iacopi S; Amorese G; Giorgi S; Baggiani A; Boggi U
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Mar; 32(3):1234-1247. PubMed ID: 28812160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surgical approach to pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: uncomplicated ends justify the means.
    Naffouje SA; Pointer DT; Satyadi MA; Hodul P; Anaya DA; Pimiento J; Malafa M; Kim DW; Fleming JB; Denbo JW
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Jul; 36(7):4912-4922. PubMed ID: 34859301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term Outcomes After Laparoscopic, Robotic, and Open Pancreatoduodenectomy for Distal Cholangiocarcinoma: An International Propensity Score-matched Cohort Study.
    Uijterwijk BA; Lemmers DHL; Bolm L; Luyer M; Koh YX; Mazzola M; Webber L; Kazemier G; Bannone E; Ramaekers M; Ielpo B; Wellner U; Koek S; Giani A; Besselink MG; Abu Hilal M;
    Ann Surg; 2023 Sep; 278(3):e570-e579. PubMed ID: 36730852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Outcomes After Minimally-invasive Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Pan-European Propensity Score Matched Study.
    Klompmaker S; van Hilst J; Wellner UF; Busch OR; Coratti A; D'Hondt M; Dokmak S; Festen S; Kerem M; Khatkov I; Lips DJ; Lombardo C; Luyer M; Manzoni A; Molenaar IQ; Rosso E; Saint-Marc O; Vansteenkiste F; Wittel UA; Bonsing B; Groot Koerkamp B; Abu Hilal M; Fuks D; Poves I; Keck T; Boggi U; Besselink MG;
    Ann Surg; 2020 Feb; 271(2):356-363. PubMed ID: 29864089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of Neoadjuvant Treatment and Minimally Invasive Surgery on Perioperative Outcomes of Pancreatoduodenectomy: an ACS NSQIP Analysis.
    Al Abbas AI; Meier J; Hester CA; Radi I; Yan J; Zhu H; Mansour JC; Porembka MR; Wang SC; Yopp AC; Zeh HJ; Polanco PM
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2023 Dec; 27(12):2823-2842. PubMed ID: 37903972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy reduces incidence of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula in soft pancreas with a smaller than 2 mm pancreatic duct.
    Hong SS; Chong JU; Hwang HK; Lee WJ; Kang CM
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Dec; 35(12):7094-7103. PubMed ID: 33398573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multicenter comparison of totally laparoscopic and totally robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: Propensity score and learning curve-matching analyses.
    Kim H; Choi SH; Jang JY; Choi M; Lee JH; Kang CM
    J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2022 Mar; 29(3):311-321. PubMed ID: 34773395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fistula risk score-adjusted comparison of postoperative pancreatic fistula following laparoscopic vs open pancreatoduodenectomy.
    Lee B; Yoon YS; Kang CM; Choi M; Lee JS; Hwang HK; Cho JY; Lee WJ; Han HS
    J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2021 Dec; 28(12):1089-1097. PubMed ID: 33174394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improved outcomes with minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with dilated pancreatic ducts: a prospective study.
    Cos H; LeCompte MT; Srinivasa S; Zarate Rodriguez J; Woolsey CA; Williams G; Patel S; Khan A; Fields RC; Majella Doyle MB; Chapman WC; Strasberg SM; Hawkins WG; Hammill CW; Sanford DE
    Surg Endosc; 2022 May; 36(5):3100-3109. PubMed ID: 34235587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula: Is Minimally Invasive Surgery Better than Open? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Petrucciani N; Crovetto A; DE Felice F; Pace M; Giulitti D; Yusef M; Nigri G; Valabrega S; Kassir R; D'Angelo F; Debs T; Ramacciato G; Aurello P
    Anticancer Res; 2022 Jul; 42(7):3285-3298. PubMed ID: 35790274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
    Kwon J; Song KB; Park SY; Shin D; Hong S; Park Y; Lee W; Lee JH; Hwang DW; Kim SC
    Cancers (Basel); 2020 Apr; 12(4):. PubMed ID: 32326595
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy decreases the risk of clinically relevant post-operative pancreatic fistula: a propensity score matched NSQIP analysis.
    Vining CC; Kuchta K; Berger Y; Paterakos P; Schuitevoerder D; Roggin KK; Talamonti MS; Hogg ME
    HPB (Oxford); 2021 Mar; 23(3):367-378. PubMed ID: 32811765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perioperative and Oncological Outcomes of Robotic Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Low-Risk Surgical Candidates: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Study.
    Liu Q; Zhao Z; Zhang X; Wang W; Han B; Chen X; Tan X; Xu S; Zhao G; Gao Y; Gan Q; Yuan J; Ma Y; Dong Y; Liu Z; Wang H; Fan F; Liu J; Lau WY; Liu R
    Ann Surg; 2023 Apr; 277(4):e864-e871. PubMed ID: 34417366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The clinical implication of minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for non-pancreatic periampullary cancer: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.
    Uijterwijk BA; Kasai M; Lemmers DHL; Chinnusamy P; van Hilst J; Ielpo B; Wei K; Song KB; Kim SC; Klompmaker S; Jang JY; Herremans KM; Bencini L; Coratti A; Mazzola M; Menon KV; Goh BKP; Qin R; Besselink MG; Abu Hilal M;
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2023 Aug; 408(1):311. PubMed ID: 37581763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.