136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38887641)
1. Predicting micropollutant removal through nanopore-sized membranes using several machine-learning approaches based on feature engineering.
Yogarathinam LT; Abba SI; Usman J; Lawal DU; Aljundi IH
RSC Adv; 2024 Jun; 14(27):19331-19348. PubMed ID: 38887641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predicting Micropollutant Removal by Reverse Osmosis and Nanofiltration Membranes: Is Machine Learning Viable?
Jeong N; Chung TH; Tong T
Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Aug; 55(16):11348-11359. PubMed ID: 34342439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of organic contaminant rejection by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes using interpretable machine learning models.
Zhu T; Zhang Y; Tao C; Chen W; Cheng H
Sci Total Environ; 2023 Jan; 857(Pt 1):159348. PubMed ID: 36228787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modeling micropollutant removal by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes: considerations and challenges.
Castaño Osorio S; Biesheuvel PM; Spruijt E; Dykstra JE; van der Wal A
Water Res; 2022 Oct; 225():119130. PubMed ID: 36240724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Micropollutant rejection by nanofiltration membranes: A mini review dedicated to the critical factors and modelling prediction.
Xu R; Zhang Z; Deng C; Nie C; Wang L; Shi W; Lyu T; Yang Q
Environ Res; 2024 Mar; 244():117935. PubMed ID: 38103781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A review on the occurrence of micropollutants in the aquatic environment and their fate and removal during wastewater treatment.
Luo Y; Guo W; Ngo HH; Nghiem LD; Hai FI; Zhang J; Liang S; Wang XC
Sci Total Environ; 2014 Mar; 473-474():619-41. PubMed ID: 24394371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Key constructed wetland design features for maximized micropollutant removal from treated municipal wastewater: A literature study based on 16 indicator micropollutants.
Wagner TV; Rempe F; Hoek M; Schuman E; Langenhoff A
Water Res; 2023 Oct; 244():120534. PubMed ID: 37659177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Micropollutant removal capacity and stability of aquaporin incorporated biomimetic thin-film composite membranes.
Yılmaz H; Özkan M
Biotechnol Rep (Amst); 2022 Sep; 35():e00745. PubMed ID: 35719851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rejection of emerging organic micropollutants in nanofiltration-reverse osmosis membrane applications.
Xu P; Drewes JE; Bellona C; Amy G; Kim TU; Adam M; Heberer T
Water Environ Res; 2005; 77(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 15765934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Strong improvement of nanofiltration performance on micropollutant removal and reduction of membrane fouling by hydrolyzed-aluminum nanoparticles.
Wang P; Wang F; Jiang H; Zhang Y; Zhao M; Xiong R; Ma J
Water Res; 2020 May; 175():115649. PubMed ID: 32200335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Insight into soft chemometric computational learning for modelling oily-wastewater separation efficiency and permeate flux of polypyrrole-decorated ceramic-polymeric membranes.
Baig U; Usman J; Abba SI; Yogarathinam LT; Waheed A; Bafaqeer A; Aljundi IH
J Chromatogr A; 2024 Jun; 1725():464897. PubMed ID: 38678694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Review on the fate of organic micropollutants in wastewater treatment and water reuse with membranes.
Siegrist H; Joss A
Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(6):1369-76. PubMed ID: 22828319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In Situ Modification of Reverse Osmosis Membrane Elements for Enhanced Removal of Multiple Micropollutants.
Baransi-Karkaby K; Bass M; Freger V
Membranes (Basel); 2019 Feb; 9(2):. PubMed ID: 30781791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of simultaneous retention of micropollutants and laccase on micropollutant degradation in enzymatic membrane bioreactor.
Asif MB; Hai FI; Dhar BR; Ngo HH; Guo W; Jegatheesan V; Price WE; Nghiem LD; Yamamoto K
Bioresour Technol; 2018 Nov; 267():473-480. PubMed ID: 30036848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Removal of emerging organic micropollutants via modified-reverse osmosis/nanofiltration membranes: A review.
Khoo YS; Goh PS; Lau WJ; Ismail AF; Abdullah MS; Mohd Ghazali NH; Yahaya NKEM; Hashim N; Othman AR; Mohammed A; Kerisnan NDA; Mohamed Yusoff MA; Fazlin Hashim NH; Karim J; Abdullah NS
Chemosphere; 2022 Oct; 305():135151. PubMed ID: 35654232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Removal of pharmaceutically active compounds from water sources using nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes: Comparison of removal efficiencies and in-depth analysis of rejection mechanisms.
Matin A; Jillani SMS; Baig U; Ihsanullah I; Alhooshani K
J Environ Manage; 2023 Jul; 338():117682. PubMed ID: 37003228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Removal of steroid micropollutants by polymer-based spherical activated carbon (PBSAC) assisted membrane filtration.
Tagliavini M; Schäfer AI
J Hazard Mater; 2018 Jul; 353():514-521. PubMed ID: 29719277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Super-fine powdered activated carbon (SPAC) for efficient removal of micropollutants from wastewater treatment plant effluent.
Bonvin F; Jost L; Randin L; Bonvin E; Kohn T
Water Res; 2016 Mar; 90():90-99. PubMed ID: 26724443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing predictive performance of supervised machine learning algorithms for a diamond pricing model.
Kigo SN; Omondi EO; Omolo BO
Sci Rep; 2023 Oct; 13(1):17315. PubMed ID: 37828360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Iron-ozone catalytic oxidation reactive filtration of municipal wastewater at field pilot and full-scale with high-efficiency pollutant removal and potential negative CO
Baker MC; McCarthy D; Taslakyan L; Henchion G; Mannion R; Strawn DG; Möller G
Water Environ Res; 2023 May; 95(5):e10876. PubMed ID: 37142261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
