These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3888802)
1. [Diagnostic error using ultrasound. Potential risks caused by deficient quality assurance by the manufacturer]. Schwing C Fortschr Med; 1985 Apr; 103(14):82-3. PubMed ID: 3888802 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Quality assurance in ultrasound diagnostic equipment in West Germany. Experiences with current regulations]. Trier HG Ultraschall Med; 1985 Oct; 6(5):255-64. PubMed ID: 3909397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Results of a study of quality control of diagnostic ultrasound equipment]. Kollmann C Ultraschall Med; 1995 Oct; 16(5):206-9. PubMed ID: 8533069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Objective performance testing and quality assurance of medical ultrasound equipment. Thijssen JM; Weijers G; de Korte CL Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 33(3):460-71. PubMed ID: 17275983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The quality assurance of high resolution, real time, ultrasound equipment. Brough P Radiogr Today; 1990 Jan; 56(632):16-7. PubMed ID: 2182047 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Procedures for the implementation of a program for quality control and assurance in ultrasonography equipment]. Lago P; Matthey M; Modena L; Ventimiglia V; Attolini L; Campani R Radiol Med; 1996 Jun; 91(6):781-8. PubMed ID: 8830366 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Quality control in ultrasonography]. Meuwly JY Ther Umsch; 1997 Jan; 54(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 9064797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The accuracy of continued clinical use of goldmann applanation tonometers with known calibration errors. Sandhu SS; Chattopadhyay S; Amariotakis GA; Skarmoutsos F; Birch MK; Ray-Chaudhuri N Ophthalmology; 2009 Jan; 116(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 18801579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of spectral Doppler flow and tissue velocity measurements in ultrasound systems. Walker A; Olsson E; Wranne B; Ringqvist I; Ask P Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Jan; 30(1):127-32. PubMed ID: 14962617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Evaluation of errors of ultrasonic diagnosis based on the analysis of our cases]. Juszczyk Z Pol Tyg Lek; 1985 Jan; 40(3):69-71. PubMed ID: 3885189 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Bavarian insurance group wants to sharpen quality control: sonography in many general practice facing obsolescence]. Schmidt K MMW Fortschr Med; 2005 Oct; 147(41):50-1. PubMed ID: 16270515 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical trials and evaluation of a mobile, robotic tele-ultrasound system. Courreges F; Vieyres P; Istepanian RS; Arbeille P; Bru C J Telemed Telecare; 2005; 11 Suppl 1():46-9. PubMed ID: 16035992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sources of error in ultrasonography. Yäyrynen T; Päivänsalo M Rontgenblatter; 1986 Jun; 39(6):146-50. PubMed ID: 3523726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Medical equipment--errors, causes and risks]. Hofmann B Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1997 Oct; 117(24):3510-3. PubMed ID: 9411911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of ultrasound scanners by acoustic signal injection. Duggan TC; Sik MJ Ultrasound Med Biol; 1983; Suppl 2():179-84. PubMed ID: 6400237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. WFUMB Safety Symposium on Echo-Contrast Agents: exposure from diagnostic ultrasound equipment relating to cavitation risk. Whittingham TA Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 33(2):214-23. PubMed ID: 17241738 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Hygiene in endovaginal gynecologic and obstetrical ultrasound in 2008]. Chalouhi GE; Salomon LJ; Marelle P; Bernard JP; Ville Y J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2009 Feb; 38(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 19081685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]