137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38889219)
1. Flow by Any Other Name: A Correlative Assessment of Multimodality Myocardial Flow.
Davies DR; Francois CJ
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2024 Jun; 17(6):e017029. PubMed ID: 38889219
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Absolute Stress Myocardial Blood Flow After Coronary CT Angiography Guides Referral to Invasive Angiography.
Stenström I; Maaniitty T; Uusitalo V; Ukkonen H; Kajander S; Mäki M; Nammas W; Bax JJ; Knuuti J; Saraste A
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Nov; 12(11 Pt 1):2266-2267. PubMed ID: 31542538
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Prognostic Value of Coronary CT Angiography With Selective PET Perfusion Imaging in Coronary Artery Disease.
Maaniitty T; Stenström I; Bax JJ; Uusitalo V; Ukkonen H; Kajander S; Mäki M; Saraste A; Knuuti J
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Nov; 10(11):1361-1370. PubMed ID: 28528146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion imaging identifies reduced flow reserve in microvascular coronary artery disease.
Zorach B; Shaw PW; Bourque J; Kuruvilla S; Balfour PC; Yang Y; Mathew R; Pan J; Gonzalez JA; Taylor AM; Meyer CH; Epstein FH; Kramer CM; Salerno M
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2018 Feb; 20(1):14. PubMed ID: 29471856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fusion of CT coronary angiography and whole-heart dynamic 3D cardiac MR perfusion: building a framework for comprehensive cardiac imaging.
von Spiczak J; Manka R; Gotschy A; Oebel S; Kozerke S; Hamada S; Alkadhi H
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Apr; 34(4):649-660. PubMed ID: 29080955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dynamic perfusion CT: what is normal myocardial blood flow?
Saraste A; Knuuti J
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Mar; 16(3):288-9. PubMed ID: 25378471
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative Assessment of Coronary Microvascular Function: Dynamic Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography, Positron Emission Tomography, Ultrasound, Computed Tomography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Feher A; Sinusas AJ
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Aug; 10(8):. PubMed ID: 28794138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Absolute flow or myocardial flow reserve for the detection of significant coronary artery disease?
Joutsiniemi E; Saraste A; Pietilä M; Mäki M; Kajander S; Ukkonen H; Airaksinen J; Knuuti J
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Jun; 15(6):659-65. PubMed ID: 24408930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Combined Positron Emission Tomography and Magnetic Resonance as Translational Tool in Cardiology.
Schwaiger M
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Mar; 9(3):e004549. PubMed ID: 26926271
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Fused cardiac hybrid imaging with coronary computed tomography angiography and positron emission tomography in patients with complex coronary artery anomalies.
Gräni C; Benz DC; Possner M; Clerc OF; Mikulicic F; Vontobel J; Stehli J; Fuchs TA; Pazhenkottil AP; Gaemperli O; Kaufmann PA; Buechel RR
Congenit Heart Dis; 2017 Jan; 12(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 27539240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Myocardial perfusion imaging with PET.
Driessen RS; Raijmakers PG; Stuijfzand WJ; Knaapen P
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Jul; 33(7):1021-1031. PubMed ID: 28188475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computed Tomographic Perfusion Improves Diagnostic Power of Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography in Women: Analysis of the CORE320 Trial (Coronary Artery Evaluation Using 320-Row Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography and Myocardial Perfusion) According to Gender.
Penagaluri A; Higgins AY; Vavere AL; Miller JM; Arbab-Zadeh A; Betoko A; Steveson C; Zimmermann E; Cox C; Rochitte CE; Dewey M; Kofoed KF; Niinuma H; Di Carli MF; Lima JA; Chen MY
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Nov; 9(11):. PubMed ID: 27811151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relationship between regional myocardial oxygenation and perfusion in patients with coronary artery disease: insights from cardiovascular magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography.
Karamitsos TD; Leccisotti L; Arnold JR; Recio-Mayoral A; Bhamra-Ariza P; Howells RK; Searle N; Robson MD; Rimoldi OE; Camici PG; Neubauer S; Selvanayagam JB
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Jan; 3(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 19920032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Qualitative angiographic and quantitative myocardial perfusion assessment using fluorescent cardiac imaging during graded coronary artery bypass stenosis.
Detter C; Russ D; Kersten JF; Reichenspurner H; Wipper S
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Feb; 34(2):159-167. PubMed ID: 28712068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Additive value of magnetic resonance coronary angiography in a comprehensive cardiac magnetic resonance stress-rest protocol for detection of functionally significant coronary artery disease: a pilot study.
Bettencourt N; Ferreira N; Chiribiri A; Schuster A; Sampaio F; Santos L; Melica B; Rodrigues A; Braga P; Teixeira M; Leite-Moreira A; Silva-Cardoso J; Portugal P; Gama V; Nagel E
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Sep; 6(5):730-8. PubMed ID: 23833284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relative flow reserve derived from quantitative perfusion imaging may not outperform stress myocardial blood flow for identification of hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease.
Stuijfzand WJ; Uusitalo V; Kero T; Danad I; Rijnierse MT; Saraste A; Raijmakers PG; Lammertsma AA; Harms HJ; Heymans MW; Huisman MC; Marques KM; Kajander SA; Pietilä M; Sörensen J; van Royen N; Knuuti J; Knaapen P
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 25596142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Semi-quantitative myocardial perfusion measured by computed tomography in patients with refractory angina: a head-to-head comparison with quantitative rubidium-82 positron emission tomography as reference.
Qayyum AA; Kühl JT; Kjaer A; Hasbak P; Kofoed KF; Kastrup J
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2017 Sep; 37(5):481-488. PubMed ID: 26625937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Underestimation of myocardial blood flow by dynamic perfusion CT: Explanations by two-compartment model analysis and limited temporal sampling of dynamic CT.
Ishida M; Kitagawa K; Ichihara T; Natsume T; Nakayama R; Nagasawa N; Kubooka M; Ito T; Uno M; Goto Y; Nagata M; Sakuma H
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 26851149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Incremental Prognostic Value of Myocardial Blood Flow Quantified With Stress Dynamic Computed Tomography Perfusion Imaging.
Nakamura S; Kitagawa K; Goto Y; Omori T; Kurita T; Yamada A; Takafuji M; Uno M; Dohi K; Sakuma H
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Jul; 12(7 Pt 2):1379-1387. PubMed ID: 30031698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion imaging compared to invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve meta-analysis.
Takx RA; Blomberg BA; El Aidi H; Habets J; de Jong PA; Nagel E; Hoffmann U; Leiner T
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 25596143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
