125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38891566)
1. eDNA Metabarcoding Reveals the Species-Area Relationship of Amphibians on the Zhoushan Archipelago.
Li W; Hou X; Zhu Y; Du J; Xu C; Yang J; Li Y
Animals (Basel); 2024 May; 14(11):. PubMed ID: 38891566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validating eDNA measurements of the richness and abundance of anurans at a large scale.
Li W; Hou X; Xu C; Qin M; Wang S; Wei L; Wang Y; Liu X; Li Y
J Anim Ecol; 2021 Jun; 90(6):1466-1479. PubMed ID: 33694188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation and development of eDNA metabarcoding primers for comprehensive assessment of Chinese amphibians.
Wu D; Lee P; Chen H; Yan F; Huang J; He Y; Wu R; Yuan Z
Integr Zool; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38730493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nested distribution of amphibians in the Zhoushan archipelago, China: can selective extinction cause nested subsets of species?
Yiming L; Niemelä J; Dianmo L
Oecologia; 1998 Feb; 113(4):557-564. PubMed ID: 28308036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nearby large islands diminish biodiversity of the focal island by a negative target effect.
Wang D; Zhao Y; Tang S; Liu X; Li W; Han P; Zeng D; Yang Y; Wei G; Kang Y; Si X
J Anim Ecol; 2023 Feb; 92(2):492-502. PubMed ID: 36478128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Do functional and phylogenetic nestedness follow the same mechanisms as taxonomic nestedness? Evidence from amphibians in the largest archipelago of China.
Chen C; Zhan C; Wang Y
J Anim Ecol; 2022 Dec; 91(12):2424-2436. PubMed ID: 36260356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantification of mesocosm fish and amphibian species diversity via environmental DNA metabarcoding.
Evans NT; Olds BP; Renshaw MA; Turner CR; Li Y; Jerde CL; Mahon AR; Pfrender ME; Lamberti GA; Lodge DM
Mol Ecol Resour; 2016 Jan; 16(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 26032773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Monitoring of spatiotemporal occupancy patterns of fish and amphibian species in a lentic aquatic system using environmental DNA.
Brys R; Haegeman A; Halfmaerten D; Neyrinck S; Staelens A; Auwerx J; Ruttink T
Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):3097-3110. PubMed ID: 33222312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Enhancing amphibian biomonitoring through eDNA metabarcoding.
Mu Y; Zhang J; Yang J; Wu J; Zhang Y; Yu H; Zhang X
Mol Ecol Resour; 2024 May; 24(4):e13931. PubMed ID: 38345249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improving herpetological surveys in eastern North America using the environmental DNA method.
Lacoursière-Roussel A; Dubois Y; Normandeau E; Bernatchez L
Genome; 2016 Nov; 59(11):991-1007. PubMed ID: 27788021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Environmental DNA and visual encounter surveys for amphibian biomonitoring in aquatic environments of the Ecuadorian Amazon.
Quilumbaquin W; Carrera-Gonzalez A; Van der Heyden C; Ortega-Andrade HM
PeerJ; 2023; 11():e15455. PubMed ID: 37456876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Next-generation monitoring of aquatic biodiversity using environmental DNA metabarcoding.
Valentini A; Taberlet P; Miaud C; Civade R; Herder J; Thomsen PF; Bellemain E; Besnard A; Coissac E; Boyer F; Gaboriaud C; Jean P; Poulet N; Roset N; Copp GH; Geniez P; Pont D; Argillier C; Baudoin JM; Peroux T; Crivelli AJ; Olivier A; Acqueberge M; Le Brun M; Møller PR; Willerslev E; Dejean T
Mol Ecol; 2016 Feb; 25(4):929-42. PubMed ID: 26479867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of environmental DNA in assessment of fish functional and phylogenetic diversity.
Marques V; Castagné P; Polanco A; Borrero-Pérez GH; Hocdé R; Guérin PÉ; Juhel JB; Velez L; Loiseau N; Letessier TB; Bessudo S; Valentini A; Dejean T; Mouillot D; Pellissier L; Villéger S
Conserv Biol; 2021 Dec; 35(6):1944-1956. PubMed ID: 34224158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. eDNA Metabarcoding Benchmarked towards Conventional Survey Methods in Amphibian Monitoring.
Svenningsen AKN; Pertoldi C; Bruhn D
Animals (Basel); 2022 Mar; 12(6):. PubMed ID: 35327161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of benthic invertebrate diversity and river ecological status along an urbanized gradient using environmental DNA metabarcoding and a traditional survey method.
Ji F; Han D; Yan L; Yan S; Zha J; Shen J
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Feb; 806(Pt 2):150587. PubMed ID: 34582852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Airborne environmental DNA metabarcoding detects more diversity, with less sampling effort, than a traditional plant community survey.
Johnson MD; Fokar M; Cox RD; Barnes MA
BMC Ecol Evol; 2021 Dec; 21(1):218. PubMed ID: 34872490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Integrating eDNA metabarcoding and simultaneous underwater visual surveys to describe complex fish communities in a marine biodiversity hotspot.
Valdivia-Carrillo T; Rocha-Olivares A; Reyes-Bonilla H; Domínguez-Contreras JF; Munguia-Vega A
Mol Ecol Resour; 2021 Jul; 21(5):1558-1574. PubMed ID: 33683812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. eDNA metabarcoding survey reveals fine-scale coral reef community variation across a remote, tropical island ecosystem.
West KM; Stat M; Harvey ES; Skepper CL; DiBattista JD; Richards ZT; Travers MJ; Newman SJ; Bunce M
Mol Ecol; 2020 Mar; 29(6):1069-1086. PubMed ID: 32045076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimating aquatic plant diversity and distribution in rivers from Jingjinji region, China, using environmental DNA metabarcoding and a traditional survey method.
Ji F; Yan L; Yan S; Qin T; Shen J; Zha J
Environ Res; 2021 Aug; 199():111348. PubMed ID: 34029550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using eDNA to survey amphibians: Methods, applications, and challenges.
Sun X; Guo N; Gao J; Xiao N
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2024 Feb; 121(2):456-471. PubMed ID: 37986625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
