These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3889287)
21. Influence of different retraction techniques on crevicular fluid flow. Wöstmann B; Rehmann P; Balkenhol M Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(3):215-6. PubMed ID: 18548958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Alum solution as an adjunct to gingival retraction. A clinical evaluation. Wilson CA; Tay WM Br Dent J; 1977 Mar; 142(5):155-8. PubMed ID: 320987 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Epinephrine absorption from commercial gingival retraction cords in clinical patients. Kellam SA; Smith JR; Scheffel SJ J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Nov; 68(5):761-5. PubMed ID: 1432796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A clinical comparison of cordless and conventional displacement systems regarding clinical performance and impression quality. Acar Ö; Erkut S; Özçelik TB; Ozdemır E; Akçil M J Prosthet Dent; 2014 May; 111(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 24360008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Gingival tissue inflammatory response following treatment with chemical retraction agents in Beagle dogs. Kopac I; Cvetko E; Pavlica Z; Marion L Pflugers Arch; 2001; 442(6 Suppl 1):R145-6. PubMed ID: 11678316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Determination of plasma catecholamines in dogs after experimental gingival retraction with epinephrine-impregnated cord. Shaw DH; Krejci RF; Todd GL; Reinhardt RA Arch Oral Biol; 1987; 32(3):217-9. PubMed ID: 3310978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Review of the pH of hemostatic agents used in tissue displacement. Woody RD; Miller A; Staffanou RS J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Aug; 70(2):191-2. PubMed ID: 8371184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Evaluation of gingival inflammation related to different retraction agents]. Sun XW; Sun GL; Xiao LJ Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Feb; 26(1):53-5. PubMed ID: 18357884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A multicenter randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing the use of displacement cords, an aluminum chloride paste, and a combination of paste and cords for tissue displacement. Einarsdottir ER; Lang NP; Aspelund T; Pjetursson BE J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jan; 119(1):82-88. PubMed ID: 28478985 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A randomized controlled clinical trial comparing the use of displacement cords and aluminum chloride paste. Bennani V; Aarts JM; Brunton P J Esthet Restor Dent; 2020 Jun; 32(4):410-415. PubMed ID: 32442353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cotton pellets and gingival retraction cords. Clinical notes No. 2. Tyas M Aust Dent J; 1984 Aug; 29(4):279. PubMed ID: 6395843 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]