These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38893860)

  • 1. Cutting Efficiency of Diamond Grinders on Composite and Zirconia.
    Rosentritt M; Strasser T; Mueller MM; Schmidt MB
    Materials (Basel); 2024 May; 17(11):. PubMed ID: 38893860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro assessment of cutting efficiency and durability of zirconia removal diamond rotary instruments.
    Kim JS; Bae JH; Yun MJ; Huh JB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jun; 117(6):775-783. PubMed ID: 27817828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing the cutting efficiency of different burs on zirconia substrate.
    Peters OA; Du D; Ho MY; Chu R; Moule A
    Aust Endod J; 2019 Dec; 45(3):289-297. PubMed ID: 30983118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bur Choice When Removing Zirconia Restorations.
    Keeling FL; Taft RM; Haney SJ
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Apr; 32(4):347-352. PubMed ID: 35771711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cutting efficiency of different diamond burs after repeated cuts and sterilization cycles in autoclave.
    Gonzaga CC; Falcão Spina DR; de Paiva Bertoli FM; Feres RL; Franco Fernandes AB; da Cunha LF
    Indian J Dent Res; 2019; 30(6):915-919. PubMed ID: 31939371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparative study of the cutting efficiency of diamond rotary instruments with different grit sizes with a low-speed electric handpiece against zirconia specimens.
    van Aswegen A; Jagathpal AJ; Sykes LM; Schoeman H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jan; 131(1):101.e1-101.e8. PubMed ID: 37925249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cutting efficiency of diamond burs operated with electric high-speed dental handpiece on zirconia.
    Nakamura K; Katsuda Y; Ankyu S; Harada A; Tenkumo T; Kanno T; Niwano Y; Egusa H; Milleding P; Örtengren U
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2015 Oct; 123(5):375-380. PubMed ID: 26315542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of cutting rates among single-patient-use and multiple-patient-use diamond burs.
    Pilcher ES; Tietge JD; Draughn RA
    J Prosthodont; 2000 Jun; 9(2):66-70. PubMed ID: 11070132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of diamond rotary instruments marketed for removing zirconia restorations.
    Hunziker S; Thorpe L; Zitzmann NU; Rohr N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 May; 131(5):895-902. PubMed ID: 36153187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy of ceramic repair material on the bond strength of composite resin to zirconia ceramic.
    Kirmali O; Kapdan A; Harorli OT; Barutcugil C; Ozarslan MM
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2015 Jan; 73(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 25373516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of surface treatments on dental zirconia: An analysis of biaxial flexural strength, surface roughness and phase transformation.
    Botelho MG; Dangay S; Shih K; Lam WYH
    J Dent; 2018 Aug; 75():65-73. PubMed ID: 29842902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tooth preparation: a study on the effect of different variables and a comparison between conventional and channeled diamond burs.
    Galindo DF; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Greene TD; Moss ME; Lee HJ; Ben-Hanan U; Graser GN; Barzilay I
    J Prosthodont; 2004 Mar; 13(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 15032891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of finishing instrumentation on the marginal integrity of resin-based composite restorations.
    Maresca C; Pimenta LA; Heymann HO; Ziemiecki TL; Ritter AV
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2010 Apr; 22(2):104-12. PubMed ID: 20433561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Wear of human enamel opposing monolithic zirconia, glass ceramic, and composite resin: an in vitro study.
    Sripetchdanond J; Leevailoj C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1141-50. PubMed ID: 24980740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Changes in the cutting efficiency of different types of dental diamond rotary instrument with repeated cuts and disinfection.
    Bae JH; Yi J; Kim S; Shim JS; Lee KW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jan; 111(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 24231434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Examination of the mechanical properties of zirconia and porcelain blocks after grinding with smooth and coarse diamond burrs].
    Shemer S; Hendler A; Pilo R; Weiss E; Perez-Davidi M
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2014 Apr; 31(2):31-9, 87. PubMed ID: 25252469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing cutting efficiencies of diamond burs using a high-speed electric handpiece.
    Chung EM; Sung EC; Wu B; Caputo AA
    Gen Dent; 2006; 54(4):254-7. PubMed ID: 16903197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative effects of tungsten, diamond burs and laser for residual adhesive removal after orthodontic debonding on flexural strength, surface roughness and phase transformation of high-translucent zirconia: An in vitro study.
    Babaee Hemmati Y; Neshandar Asil H; Falahchai M; Safari N
    Int Orthod; 2022 Sep; 20(3):100665. PubMed ID: 35851494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Comparative Study on Simulated Chairside Grinding and Polishing of Monolithic Zirconia.
    Kheur M; Lakha T; Shaikh S; Kheur S; Qamri B; Zhen LW; Al-Haj Husain N; Özcan M
    Materials (Basel); 2022 Mar; 15(6):. PubMed ID: 35329653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of sectioning rates among carbide and diamond burs using three casting alloys.
    Siegel SC; von Fraunhofer JA
    J Prosthodont; 1999 Dec; 8(4):240-4. PubMed ID: 10895675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.