These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38894413)

  • 1. Source Models of the 2016 and 2022 Menyuan Earthquakes and Their Tectonic Implications Revealed by InSAR.
    Bai X; Zhang B; Guo A; Yan Y; Xu H; Bian X; Zhan S; Chen J
    Sensors (Basel); 2024 Jun; 24(11):. PubMed ID: 38894413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tectonic Implication of the 2022
    Yin X; Zhai H; Cai R; Qiu J; Zou X
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Feb; 23(4):. PubMed ID: 36850725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Research on the Surface Deformation, Fault Rupture, and Coseismic Geohazard of the 2022 Luding Mw 6.8 Earthquake.
    Lu Y; Yang Y; Zeng L; Xu W; Song J; Li X
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Dec; 23(24):. PubMed ID: 38139720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Post-seismic deformation mechanism of the July 2015 MW 6.5 Pishan earthquake revealed by Sentinel-1A InSAR observation.
    Wang S; Zhang Y; Wang Y; Jiao J; Ji Z; Han M
    Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):18536. PubMed ID: 33116168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A New Perspective on Fault Geometry and Slip Distribution of the 2009 Dachaidan Mw 6.3 Earthquake from InSAR Observations.
    Liu Y; Xu C; Wen Y; Fok HS
    Sensors (Basel); 2015 Jul; 15(7):16786-803. PubMed ID: 26184210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Coseismic fault-slip distribution of the 2019 Ridgecrest Mw6.4 and Mw7.1 earthquakes.
    Gao Y; Duan H; Zhang Y; Chen J; Jian H; Wu R; Yin W
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jul; 11(1):14188. PubMed ID: 34244533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Coseismic Deformation Field and Fault Slip Distribution Inversion of the 2020 Jiashi
    Zhang X; Li J; Liu X; Li Z; Adil N
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Mar; 23(6):. PubMed ID: 36991757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spatial-temporal evolution of soil gas Rn before two Ms ≥ 5.0 earthquakes in the mid-eastern of the Qilian fault zone (QLF).
    Zhou H; Wan Y; Su H; Li C
    Sci Rep; 2023 Dec; 13(1):21491. PubMed ID: 38057372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shallow fault-zone dilatancy recovery after the 2003 Bam earthquake in Iran.
    Fielding EJ; Lundgren PR; Bürgmann R; Funning GJ
    Nature; 2009 Mar; 458(7234):64-8. PubMed ID: 19262670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Immature characteristics of the East Anatolian Fault Zone from SAR, GNSS and strong motion data of the 2023 Türkiye-Syria earthquake doublet.
    Liu J; Huang C; Zhang G; Shan X; Korzhenkov A; Taymaz T
    Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):10625. PubMed ID: 38724632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimation of recurrence interval of large earthquakes on the central Longmen Shan fault zone based on seismic moment accumulation/release model.
    Ren J; Zhang S
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2013; 2013():458341. PubMed ID: 23878524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An L-band interferometric synthetic aperture radar study on the Ganos section of the north Anatolian fault zone between 2007 and 2011: Evidence for along strike segmentation and creep in a shallow fault patch.
    de Michele M; Ergintav S; Aochi H; Raucoules D
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0185422. PubMed ID: 28961264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Crustal Dynamics and Its Geological Explanation of the Three-Dimensional Co-Seismic Deformation Field for the 2021 Maduo
    Li X; Chen Y; Wang X; Xiong R
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Apr; 23(8):. PubMed ID: 37112137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Near-source high-rate GPS, strong motion and InSAR observations to image the 2015 Lefkada (Greece) Earthquake rupture history.
    Avallone A; Cirella A; Cheloni D; Tolomei C; Theodoulidis N; Piatanesi A; Briole P; Ganas A
    Sci Rep; 2017 Sep; 7(1):10358. PubMed ID: 28871096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Earthquake potential along the northern hayward fault, california.
    Burgmann R; Schmidt D; Nadeau RM; d'Alessio M; Fielding E; Manaker D; McEvilly TV; Murray MH
    Science; 2000 Aug; 289(5482):1178-82. PubMed ID: 10947982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of different factors on coseismic deformation of the 2015 Mw7.8 earthquake in Nepal.
    Wu R; Dong X; Xia B; Wang W; She X; Chu Z
    Sci Rep; 2024 Apr; 14(1):9613. PubMed ID: 38671146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spatial Heterogeneity of b Values in Northeastern Tibetan Plateau and Its Interpretation.
    Hu N; Han P; Wang R; Shi F; Chen L; Li H
    Entropy (Basel); 2024 Feb; 26(3):. PubMed ID: 38539694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Coseismic fault slip inversion of the 2013 Lushan Ms 7.0 earthquake based on the triangular dislocation model.
    Duan H; Chen J; Zhang S; Wu X; Chu Z
    Sci Rep; 2022 Mar; 12(1):3514. PubMed ID: 35241753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Updated concepts of seismic gaps and asperities to assess great earthquake hazard along South America.
    Lay T; Nishenko SP
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Dec; 119(51):e2216843119. PubMed ID: 36512498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Paleoseismic study of the Kamishiro Fault on the northern segment of the Itoigawa-Shizuoka Tectonic Line, Japan.
    Lin A; Sano M; Wang M; Yan B; Bian D; Fueta R; Hosoya T
    J Seismol; 2017; 21(4):683-703. PubMed ID: 28729808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.