143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38895901)
1. Can artificial intelligence-driven cephalometric analysis replace manual tracing? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hendrickx J; Gracea RS; Vanheers M; Winderickx N; Preda F; Shujaat S; Jacobs R
Eur J Orthod; 2024 Aug; 46(4):. PubMed ID: 38895901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automatic cephalometric landmark identification with artificial intelligence: An umbrella review of systematic reviews.
Polizzi A; Leonardi R
J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105056. PubMed ID: 38729291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A knowledge-based algorithm for automatic detection of cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images.
Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Sardana V; Balachandran R; Sardana HK
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2015 Nov; 10(11):1737-52. PubMed ID: 25847662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating the accuracy of automated cephalometric analysis based on artificial intelligence.
Bao H; Zhang K; Yu C; Li H; Cao D; Shu H; Liu L; Yan B
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Apr; 23(1):191. PubMed ID: 37005593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of automated 3D cephalometric landmarks by deep learning algorithms: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Serafin M; Baldini B; Cabitza F; Carrafiello G; Baselli G; Del Fabbro M; Sforza C; Caprioglio A; Tartaglia GM
Radiol Med; 2023 May; 128(5):544-555. PubMed ID: 37093337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of 3D cephalometric measurements based on an automatic knowledge-based landmark detection algorithm.
Gupta A; Kharbanda OP; Sardana V; Balachandran R; Sardana HK
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Jul; 11(7):1297-309. PubMed ID: 26704370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms.
Hariharan A; Diwakar NR; Jayanthi K; Hema HM; Deepukrishna S; Ghaste SR
Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Artificial Intelligence for Detecting Cephalometric Landmarks: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
de Queiroz Tavares Borges Mesquita G; Vieira WA; Vidigal MTC; Travençolo BAN; Beaini TL; Spin-Neto R; Paranhos LR; de Brito Júnior RB
J Digit Imaging; 2023 Jun; 36(3):1158-1179. PubMed ID: 36604364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-dimensional cephalometric analysis in orthodontics: a systematic review.
Pittayapat P; Limchaichana-Bolstad N; Willems G; Jacobs R
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2014 May; 17(2):69-91. PubMed ID: 24373559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative study of cephalometric measurements using 3 imaging modalities.
Wen J; Liu S; Ye X; Xie X; Li J; Li H; Mei L
J Am Dent Assoc; 2017 Dec; 148(12):913-921. PubMed ID: 29042006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automatic Cephalometric Landmark Identification System Based on the Multi-Stage Convolutional Neural Networks with CBCT Combination Images.
Kim MJ; Liu Y; Oh SH; Ahn HW; Kim SH; Nelson G
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jan; 21(2):. PubMed ID: 33445758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of conventional versus cone-beam CT-synthesised lateral cephalograms for cephalometric analysis: A systematic review.
Raj G; Raj M; Saigo L
J Orthod; 2024 Jun; 51(2):160-176. PubMed ID: 37340975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability and reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks using CBCT: a systematic review.
Lisboa Cde O; Masterson D; da Motta AF; Motta AT
J Appl Oral Sci; 2015; 23(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 26018303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computer-aided cephalometric landmark annotation for CBCT data.
Codari M; Caffini M; Tartaglia GM; Sforza C; Baselli G
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Jan; 12(1):113-121. PubMed ID: 27358080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability of different three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks in cone-beam computed tomography : A systematic review.
Sam A; Currie K; Oh H; Flores-Mir C; Lagravére-Vich M
Angle Orthod; 2019 Mar; 89(2):317-332. PubMed ID: 30423256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A new methodology for automatic detection of reference points in 3D cephalometry: A pilot study.
Ed-Dhahraouy M; Riri H; Ezzahmouly M; Bourzgui F; El Moutaoukkil A
Int Orthod; 2018 Jun; 16(2):328-337. PubMed ID: 29628421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A semi-supervised learning approach for automated 3D cephalometric landmark identification using computed tomography.
Yun HS; Hyun CM; Baek SH; Lee SH; Seo JK
PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0275114. PubMed ID: 36170279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Newly defined landmarks for a three-dimensionally based cephalometric analysis: a retrospective cone-beam computed tomography scan review.
Lee M; Kanavakis G; Miner RM
Angle Orthod; 2015 Jan; 85(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 24866835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Deep learning for cephalometric landmark detection: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Schwendicke F; Chaurasia A; Arsiwala L; Lee JH; Elhennawy K; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Demarco F; Krois J
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Jul; 25(7):4299-4309. PubMed ID: 34046742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
