116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38896405)
21. Comparison of trueness and repeatability of facial prosthesis design using a 3D morphable model approach, traditional computer-aided design methods, and conventional manual sculpting techniques.
Jablonski RY; Malhotra T; Shaw D; Coward TJ; Shuweihdi F; Bojke C; Pavitt SH; Nattress BR; Keeling AJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38616155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Verification of clinical precision after computer-aided reconstruction in craniomaxillofacial surgery.
Metzger MC; Hohlweg-Majert B; Schön R; Teschner M; Gellrich NC; Schmelzeisen R; Gutwald R
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Oct; 104(4):e1-10. PubMed ID: 17656126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Orbital Reconstruction: Patient-Specific Orbital Floor Reconstruction Using a Mirroring Technique and a Customized Titanium Mesh.
Tarsitano A; Badiali G; Pizzigallo A; Marchetti C
J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Oct; 27(7):1822-1825. PubMed ID: 27438454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Capturing large shape variations of liver using population-based statistical shape models.
Foruzan AH; Chen YW; Hori M; Sato Y; Tomiyama N
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2014 Nov; 9(6):967-77. PubMed ID: 24748207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Virtual reconstruction of midfacial bone defect based on generative adversarial network.
Xiong YT; Zeng W; Xu L; Guo JX; Liu C; Chen JT; Du XY; Tang W
Head Face Med; 2022 Jun; 18(1):19. PubMed ID: 35761334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Quantitative Assessment of Orbital Implant Position--A Proof of Concept.
Schreurs R; Dubois L; Becking AG; Maal TJ
PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0150162. PubMed ID: 26939123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Three dimensional reconstruction of late post traumatic orbital wall defects by customized implants using CAD-CAM, 3D stereolithographic models: A case report.
U V; Mehrotra D; Dichen ; Anand V; Howlader D
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2017; 7(3):212-218. PubMed ID: 29124002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Predictability in orbital reconstruction. A human cadaver study, part III: Implant-oriented navigation for optimized reconstruction.
Dubois L; Essig H; Schreurs R; Jansen J; Maal TJ; Gooris PJ; Becking AG
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Dec; 43(10):2050-6. PubMed ID: 26454321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A Moving Morphable Components Based Shape Reconstruction Framework for Electrical Impedance Tomography.
Liu D; Du J
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2019 Dec; 38(12):2937-2948. PubMed ID: 31135356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Accuracy of Orbital Shape Reconstruction-Comparative Analysis of Errors in Implant Shape Versus Implant Positioning: A Cadaveric Study.
Hardisty M; Wei YT; Hontscharuk R; Ibrahimi A; Antonyshyn O; Edwards G; Mainprize JG; Whyne CM
J Craniofac Surg; 2023 Sep; 34(6):1727-1731. PubMed ID: 37552131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Personalized Reconstruction of Traumatic Orbital Defects Based on Precise Three-Dimensional Orientation and Measurements of the Globe.
Huang L; Lin L; Wang Z; Shi B; Zhu X; Qiu Y; Huang Y; Yu X; Liao Y
J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Jan; 28(1):172-179. PubMed ID: 27893559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A combined active shape and mean appearance model for the reconstruction of segmental bone loss.
Kramer D; Van der Merwe J; Lüthi M
Med Eng Phys; 2022 Dec; 110():103841. PubMed ID: 36031526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Analysis of simulated mandibular reconstruction using a segmental mirroring technique.
Davies JC; Chan HHL; Jozaghi Y; Goldstein DP; Irish JC
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Mar; 47(3):468-472. PubMed ID: 30661926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Synchronized "One-Step" Resection and Cranio-Orbital Reconstruction for Spheno-Orbital Lesions With Custom Made Implant.
Bassi M; Antonelli V; Tomassini A; Maimone G; D'Andrea M; Campobassi A; Gessaroli M; Tosatto L
J Craniofac Surg; 2021 Jul-Aug 01; 32(5):1870-1873. PubMed ID: 33534310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Statistical shape model-based reconstruction of a scaled, patient-specific surface model of the pelvis from a single standard AP x-ray radiograph.
Zheng G
Med Phys; 2010 Apr; 37(4):1424-39. PubMed ID: 20443464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Weighted regularized statistical shape space projection for breast 3D model reconstruction.
Ruiz G; Ramon E; García J; Sukno FM; Ballester MAG
Med Image Anal; 2018 Jul; 47():164-179. PubMed ID: 29753181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Generation of hemipelvis surface geometry based on statistical shape modelling and contralateral mirroring.
Krishna P; Robinson DL; Bucknill A; Lee PVS
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2022 Aug; 21(4):1317-1324. PubMed ID: 35713823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. 'Orbital volume restoration rate after orbital fracture'; a CT-based orbital volume measurement for evaluation of orbital wall reconstructive effect.
Wi JM; Sung KH; Chi M
Eye (Lond); 2017 May; 31(5):713-719. PubMed ID: 28085134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Craniofacial reconstruction with computer-generated HTR patient-matched implants: use in primary bony tumor excision.
Eppley BL
J Craniofac Surg; 2002 Sep; 13(5):650-7. PubMed ID: 12218793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
