113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38896864)
1. Three-Dimensional Anthropometric Facial Analysis and Fitting Discrepancies Between Stereophotogrammetry and CT.
Han W; Yan Y; Nemani S; Sun M; Kim BS; Zhang Y; Zhu M; Chai G
Ann Plast Surg; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38896864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [The anthropomorphic proportions of the face: an evaluation of the response to orthodontic surgical treatment of Angle class III].
Savastano C; Craca R
Minerva Stomatol; 1992 Sep; 41(9):373-83. PubMed ID: 1491654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Photo anthropometric variations in Japanese facial features: Establishment of large-sample standard reference data for personal identification using a three-dimensional capture system.
Ogawa Y; Wada B; Taniguchi K; Miyasaka S; Imaizumi K
Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Dec; 257():511.e1-511.e9. PubMed ID: 26341158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of RGB-D camera-based and stereophotogrammetric facial scanners: a comparative study.
Pan F; Liu J; Cen Y; Chen Y; Cai R; Zhao Z; Liao W; Wang J
J Dent; 2022 Dec; 127():104302. PubMed ID: 36152954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of three-dimensional facial imaging captured with smartphone-based photogrammetry application in comparison to stereophotogrammetry system.
Andrews J; Alwafi A; Bichu YM; Pliska BT; Mostafa N; Zou B
Heliyon; 2023 May; 9(5):e15834. PubMed ID: 37180897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of 3-dimensional stereophotogrammetry: Comparison of the 3dMD and Bellus3D facial scanning systems with one another and with direct anthropometry.
Liu J; Zhang C; Cai R; Yao Y; Zhao Z; Liao W
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Dec; 160(6):862-871. PubMed ID: 34814981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy and reliability of 3D stereophotogrammetry: A comparison to direct anthropometry and 2D photogrammetry.
Dindaroğlu F; Kutlu P; Duran GS; Görgülü S; Aslan E
Angle Orthod; 2016 May; 86(3):487-94. PubMed ID: 26267357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability of periocular anthropometry using three-dimensional digital stereophotogrammetry.
Guo Y; Rokohl AC; Schaub F; Hou X; Liu J; Ruan Y; Jia R; Koch KR; Heindl LM
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 257(11):2517-2531. PubMed ID: 31407036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability and validity of measurements of facial swelling with a stereophotogrammetry optical three-dimensional scanner.
van der Meer WJ; Dijkstra PU; Visser A; Vissink A; Ren Y
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 52(10):922-7. PubMed ID: 25219776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability of 3D Stereophotogrammetry for Measuring Postoperative Facial Swelling.
Buitenhuis MB; Klijn RJ; Rosenberg AJWP; Speksnijder CM
J Clin Med; 2022 Nov; 11(23):. PubMed ID: 36498711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Soft and hard tissue changes of hyperdivergent class Ⅱ patients before and after orthodontic extraction treatment].
Mao B; Tian Y; Wang X; Li J; Zhou Y
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2024 Feb; 56(1):111-119. PubMed ID: 38318905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Anthropometric Analysis of the Nigerian Face: Any Conformity to the Neoclassical Canons?
Olusanya AA; Aladelusi TO; Adedokun B
J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Oct; 29(7):1978-1982. PubMed ID: 30106812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Volume Assessment of the Effect of Obturators on Facial Form Following Surgery for Head and Neck Cancer Using Stereophotogrammetry.
Coward TJ; Richards R; Fenlon MR; Scott BJ
J Prosthodont; 2019 Apr; 28(4):379-386. PubMed ID: 30793816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliability of Stereophotogrammetry for Area Measurement in the Periocular Region.
Liu J; Rokohl AC; Guo Y; Li S; Hou X; Fan W; Formuzal M; Lin M; Heindl LM
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2021 Aug; 45(4):1601-1610. PubMed ID: 33452540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In a clinimetric analysis, 3D stereophotogrammetry was found to be reliable and valid for measuring scar volume in clinical research.
Stekelenburg CM; Jaspers ME; Niessen FB; Knol DL; van der Wal MB; de Vet HC; van Zuijlen PP
J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jul; 68(7):782-7. PubMed ID: 25817943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A novel standardized approach for the 3D evaluation of upper eyelid area and volume.
Guo Y; Rokohl AC; Fan W; Theodosiou R; Li X; Lou L; Gao T; Lin M; Yao K; Heindl LM
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2023 Mar; 13(3):1686-1698. PubMed ID: 36915328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can smartphones be used for routine dental clinical application? A validation study for using smartphone-generated 3D facial images.
Singh P; Hsung RT; Ajmera DH; Leung YY; McGrath C; Gu M
J Dent; 2023 Dec; 139():104775. PubMed ID: 37944629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Repeatability Study of Angular and Linear Measurements on Facial Morphology Analysis by Means of Stereophotogrammetry.
Andrade LM; Rodrigues da Silva AMB; Magri LV; Rodrigues da Silva MAM
J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Jun; 28(4):1107-1111. PubMed ID: 28212123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the Accuracy, Reliability, and Reproducibility of Two Different 3D Face-Scanning Systems.
Ye H; Lv L; Liu Y; Liu Y; Zhou Y
Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(3):213-8. PubMed ID: 27148978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the Portable Next-Generation VECTRA H2 3D Imaging System for Measuring Upper Eyelid Area and Volume.
Fan W; Rokohl AC; Maus J; Guo Y; Ju X; Li X; Wawer Matos PA; Heindl LM
Aesthet Surg J; 2023 Sep; 43(10):1114-1123. PubMed ID: 37157856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
