These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38898880)

  • 1. Identifying Disengaged Responding in Multiple-Choice Items: Extending a Latent Class Item Response Model With Novel Process Data Indicators.
    Welling J; Gnambs T; Carstensen CH
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2024 Apr; 84(2):314-339. PubMed ID: 38898880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A hierarchical latent response model for inferences about examinee engagement in terms of guessing and item-level non-response.
    Ulitzsch E; von Davier M; Pohl S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Nov; 73 Suppl 1():83-112. PubMed ID: 31709521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Multilevel Mixture IRT Framework for Modeling Response Times as Predictors or Indicators of Response Engagement in IRT Models.
    Nagy G; Ulitzsch E
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2022 Oct; 82(5):845-879. PubMed ID: 35989730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modeling Rapid Guessing Behaviors in Computer-Based Testlet Items.
    Jin KY; Hsu CL; Chiu MM; Chen PH
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2023 Jan; 47(1):19-33. PubMed ID: 36425284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The estimation of premorbid intelligence levels in French speakers].
    Mackinnon A; Mulligan R
    Encephale; 2005; 31(1 Pt 1):31-43. PubMed ID: 15971638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Disengaged response behavior when the response button is blocked: Evaluation of a micro-intervention.
    Persic-Beck L; Goldhammer F; Kroehne U
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():954532. PubMed ID: 36405144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the Treatment of Missing Item Responses in Educational Large-Scale Assessment Data: An Illustrative Simulation Study and a Case Study Using PISA 2018 Mathematics Data.
    Robitzsch A
    Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ; 2021 Dec; 11(4):1653-1687. PubMed ID: 34940395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Model-Based Approach to the Disentanglement and Differential Treatment of Engaged and Disengaged Item Omissions.
    Ulitzsch E; Zhang S; Pohl S
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2024; 59(3):599-619. PubMed ID: 38594939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An IRT-Multiple Indicators Multiple Causes (MIMIC) Approach as a Method of Examining Item Response Latency.
    Tsaousis I; Sideridis GD; Al-Sadaawi A
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2177. PubMed ID: 30542303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Explanatory Cognitive Diagnostic Models: Incorporating Latent and Observed Predictors.
    Park YS; Xing K; Lee YS
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2018 Jul; 42(5):376-392. PubMed ID: 30034055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Negative Binomial Models for Visual Fixation Counts on Test Items.
    Man K; Harring JR
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Aug; 79(4):617-635. PubMed ID: 32655176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Polytomous Scoring Approach to Handle Not-Reached Items in Low-Stakes Assessments.
    Gorgun G; Bulut O
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2021 Oct; 81(5):847-871. PubMed ID: 34421122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accounting for careless and insufficient effort responding in large-scale survey data-development, evaluation, and application of a screen-time-based weighting procedure.
    Ulitzsch E; Shin HJ; Lüdtke O
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Feb; 56(2):804-825. PubMed ID: 36867339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Effects of Personalized Nudges on Cognitively Disengaged Student Behavior in Low-Stakes Assessments.
    Arslan B; Finn B
    J Intell; 2023 Oct; 11(11):. PubMed ID: 37998703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Two-Dimensional Multiple-Choice Model Accounting for Omissions.
    Kreitchmann RS; Abad FJ; Ponsoda V
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2540. PubMed ID: 30618961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Longitudinal Exposure-Response Modeling of Multiple Indicators of Alzheimer's Disease Progression.
    Polhamus DG; Dolton MJ; Rogers JA; Honigberg L; Jin JY; Quartino A
    J Prev Alzheimers Dis; 2023; 10(2):212-222. PubMed ID: 36946448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing the prediction performance of item response theory and machine learning methods on item responses for educational assessments.
    Park JY; Dedja K; Pliakos K; Kim J; Joo S; Cornillie F; Vens C; Van den Noortgate W
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Jun; 55(4):2109-2124. PubMed ID: 35819719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Item response theory analysis of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale for Students (UWES-S) using a sample of Japanese university and college students majoring medical science, nursing, and natural science.
    Tsubakita T; Shimazaki K; Ito H; Kawazoe N
    BMC Res Notes; 2017 Oct; 10(1):528. PubMed ID: 29084577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Better assessment of physical function: item improvement is neglected but essential.
    Bruce B; Fries JF; Ambrosini D; Lingala B; Gandek B; Rose M; Ware JE
    Arthritis Res Ther; 2009; 11(6):R191. PubMed ID: 20015354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.