These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 38899995)

  • 1. Comparison of surface properties of universal shade and conventional resin-based composites after degradation and repolishing.
    Maesako M; Matsui N; Fujitani M; Garcia-Godoy F; Tsujimoto A
    Am J Dent; 2024 Jun; 37(3):147-153. PubMed ID: 38899995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of polishing on surface roughness, gloss, and color of resin composites.
    Hosoya Y; Shiraishi T; Odatsu T; Nagafuji J; Kotaku M; Miyazaki M; Powers JM
    J Oral Sci; 2011 Sep; 53(3):283-91. PubMed ID: 21959654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of immersion media and repolishing on color stability and superficial morphology of nanofilled composite resin.
    de Oliveira AL; Botta AC; Campos JÁ; Garcia PP
    Microsc Microanal; 2014 Aug; 20(4):1234-9. PubMed ID: 24892306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on surface roughness, gloss and color of resin-based composites.
    Paravina RD; Roeder L; Lu H; Vogel K; Powers JM
    Am J Dent; 2004 Aug; 17(4):262-6. PubMed ID: 15478488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of staining solutions and repolishing on color stability of direct composites.
    Mundim FM; Garcia Lda F; Pires-de-Souza Fde C
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2010; 18(3):249-54. PubMed ID: 20857002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of Surface Roughness of Ceramic and Resin Composite Material Used for Conservative Indirect Restorations, after Repolishing by Intraoral Means.
    Vrochari AD; Petropoulou A; Chronopoulos V; Polydorou O; Massey W; Hellwig E
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Jun; 26(4):296-301. PubMed ID: 26488363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of bleaching and repolishing procedures on coffee and tea stain removal from three anterior composite veneering materials.
    Türkün LS; Türkün M
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2004; 16(5):290-301; discussion 301-2. PubMed ID: 15726798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites after polishing and brushing.
    Senawongse P; Pongprueksa P
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2007; 19(5):265-73; discussion 274-5. PubMed ID: 17877626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of Finishing and Polishing Methods on the Surface Roughness and Surface Free Energy of Bulk-fill Resin Composites.
    Ishii R; Takamizawa T; Tsujimoto A; Suzuki S; Imai A; Barkmeier WW; Latta MA; Miyazaki M
    Oper Dent; 2020; 45(2):E91-E104. PubMed ID: 31738697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of one-step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials.
    Türkün LS; Türkün M
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 15088733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of two polishing pastes on the surface roughness of bis-acryl composite and methacrylate-based resins.
    Sen D; Göller G; Işsever H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):527-32. PubMed ID: 12474004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro comparison of one-step, two-step, and three-step polishing systems on the surface roughness and gloss of different resin composites.
    Lippert VF; Bresciani E; Mota EG; Bittencourt HR; Kramer PF; Spohr AM
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 May; 36(5):785-795. PubMed ID: 38130085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro evaluation of surface roughness of 4 resin composites after the toothbrushing process and methods to recover superficial smoothness.
    dos Santos PH; Pavan S; Consani S; Sobrinho LC; Sinhoreti MA; Filho JN
    Quintessence Int; 2007 May; 38(5):e247-53. PubMed ID: 17568829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surface roughness and gloss of dental materials as a function of force and polishing time in vitro.
    Heintze SD; Forjanic M; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):146-65. PubMed ID: 16084582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of various resin composites.
    Da Costa J; Ferracane J; Paravina RD; Mazur RF; Roeder L
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2007; 19(4):214-24; discussion 225-6. PubMed ID: 17635330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the Repolished Surface Properties of a Resin Composite Employing Structural Coloration Technology.
    Maesako M; Kishimoto T; Tomoda S; Horie T; Yamada M; Iwawaki R; Odagiri Y; Sakuma K; Inoue K; Takeguchi A; Suzuki M; Mitani A; Fujitani M
    Materials (Basel); 2021 Nov; 14(23):. PubMed ID: 34885437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of polishing instruments on the surface texture of resin composites.
    Watanabe T; Miyazaki M; Moore BK
    Quintessence Int; 2006 Jan; 37(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 16429705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of polishing technique on 3-D surface roughness and gloss of dental restorative resin composites.
    Ereifej NS; Oweis YG; Eliades G
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(1):E1-12. PubMed ID: 22917441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Repolishing Resin Composites After Bleaching Treatments: Effects on Color Stability and Smoothness.
    Rodrigues CS; Nora BD; Mallmann A; May LG; Jacques LB
    Oper Dent; 2019; 44(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 29856701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of acidulated phosphate fluoride gel application on surface roughness, gloss and colour of different type resin composites.
    Hosoya Y; Shiraishi T; Puppin-Rontani RM; Powers JM
    J Dent; 2011 Oct; 39(10):700-6. PubMed ID: 21856367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.